Her Florence speech on Brexit has made Theresa May an irrelevance
The best way to understand the stupidity of Theresa May’s speech on Brexit would be if an interviewer approached Jeremy Corbyn and asked how it feels for him to be the de facto leader of the Conservative government.
That is what Mrs May has done; she has admitted that she has no ideas of her own, so she has adopted Mr Corbyn’s and kicked the Brexit can another two years down the line. Perhaps she hopes she will have been removed from 10 Downing Street by then.
Her speech, touted as providing clarity on the UK’s desires for Brexit, turned out to be waffle. And it has disgusted commentators on all sides.
Here’s an example. She said the result of the EU referendum showed the people of the UK “want more direct control of decisions that affect their daily lives; and that means those decisions being made in Britain by people directly accountable to them. The strength of feeling that the British people have about this need for control and the direct accountability of their politicians is one reason why, throughout its membership, the United Kingdom has never totally felt at home being in the European Union.”
According to whom? This Writer does not recall being asked about that – how about you? From the indignation on the social media, I would imagine not:
How DARE the PM say that we have NEVER felt part of Europe !
That is SO insulting !#florencespeech— Clare Hepworth OBE (@Hepworthclare) September 22, 2017
Not in my name. From someone who studied geography at Oxford. The UK is part of Europe. Shame about the education. https://t.co/4EhfJt6fCR
— Rosemary Lucas (@LucasRosemary) September 22, 2017
https://twitter.com/deewtee/status/911247430070521856
Millions of us, especially the young, will resent May saying that we never felt part of the EU. How dare she say that! #florencespeech
— Briefcase Michael (@BriefcaseMike) September 22, 2017
“The eyes of the world are on us,” she said – but did any of the European dignitaries she invited to Florence actually turn up?
https://twitter.com/AJobTracker/status/911277080930856960
“I said that the United Kingdom would seek to secure a new, deep and special partnership with the European Union,” she told us. The response was predictable:
Strong and Stable didn’t work as a slogan so now the PM is trying Deep and Special. I think she may need a bit more than just a new slogan.
— Bill Esterson (@Bill_Esterson) September 22, 2017
This should have made alarm bells chime in many people’s heads: “To make this partnership work, because disagreements inevitably arise, we will need a strong and appropriate dispute resolution mechanism.” What, like the ‘Investor-State Dispute Settlement’ system that became the main reason the EU-US Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership treaty was scuppered? No, thank you. We don’t need any agreements that put corporations about law-making governments!
Here’s the part where she adopted Labour’s policy on a transitional period, although she tried to claim ownership of the idea and put a time limit of two years on it. She said a “period of implementation would be in our mutual interest. That is why I am proposing that there should be such a period after the UK leaves the EU… During the implementation period access to one another’s markets should continue on current terms and Britain also should continue to take part in existing security measures. The framework for this strictly time-limited period, which can be agreed under Article 50, would be the existing structure of EU rules and regulations.”
PM didn't need to go to Florence to accept that Labour is right about Brexit transitional arrangements. Not much else in the speech.
— Keir Starmer (@Keir_Starmer) September 22, 2017
https://twitter.com/xugla/status/911275298364301313
https://twitter.com/joncstone/status/911229080808382465
May adopts Labour's policy: to stay in the single market and customs union on transitional basis. Jeremy Corbyn is the prime minister
— Matt Zarb-Cousin (@mattzarb) September 22, 2017
And she caved in to the EU on the question of the UK’s payments to that organisation. They will continue, even – in part – after we have left the bloc altogether: “The UK will honour commitments we have made during the period of our membership. And as we move forwards, we will also want to continue working together in ways that promote the long-term economic development of our continent. This includes continuing to take part in those specific policies and programmes which are greatly to the UK and the EU’s joint advantage, such as those that promote science, education and culture – and those that promote our mutual security… We would want to make an ongoing contribution to cover our fair share of the costs involved.”
Boom. "UK will honour commitments we have made" – #FlorenceSpeech
This was key language EU wanted. Word for word.
— Peter Foster (@pmdfoster) September 22, 2017
So, Brexit now means – paying what we pay now, abiding by same EU rules & allowing in as many EU migrants for 2 years after we Leave in '19?
— Nick Robinson (@bbcnickrobinson) September 22, 2017
So, Theresa wants us to pay to be in the club without any clout whatsoever. Only she could let down the 52% & the 48% in one go. Impressive.
— Rachael Swindon (@Rachael_Swindon) September 22, 2017
We don't have to pay anything. No deal is better than a bad deal. They need us more than we need them. Other countries will follow us out…
— James O'Brien (@mrjamesob) September 22, 2017
The commitment to go on paying caused worry in certain quarters – because we know who will foot the bill in the end:
In case you hadn't worked it out, the UK's sick and disabled will end up paying the price of the £18bn #Brexit bill.#florencespeech
— Nick (@Mylegalforum) September 22, 2017
The speech won the disapproval of – well, practically everybody:
To be fair, Theresa May has managed to unite both Leavers and Remainers, just as she promised.
We all think she's clueless.— Tom Pride (@ThomasPride) September 22, 2017
https://twitter.com/WildTimothy/status/911230804197543937
Theresa May's #florencespeech was uninspiring, dull, flat, without detail and very unlikely to convince anyone we are on to something good.
— Nick (@Mylegalforum) September 22, 2017
There was plenty of speculation on the input of Mrs May’s deeply-divided Conservative cabinet:
Can't believe Cabinet spent hours on May's #FlorenceSpeech. Unless they were simply removing concrete detail. In which case they succeeded.
— Simon Barrow (@simonbarrow) September 22, 2017
Have cabinet Brexiteers backed May's Brexit vision coz they assume it will flop & we're heading for no-deal exit? https://t.co/RSkegecBMq
— Robert Peston (@Peston) September 22, 2017
And there was plenty of nit-picking among the less-clear parts of the speech (which, let’s be honest, was most of it):
May: "We continue to think no deal is better than a bad deal". OK where's the scenario planning for no deal. What's Italian for bullshit?
— Paul Mason (@paulmasonnews) September 22, 2017
Theresa May: "The British people voted for Brexit."
No. 27% of the population voted for Brexit and she wasn't one of them. #florencespeech— James Melville 🚜 (@JamesMelville) September 22, 2017
3 things NOT in Theresa May's speech: agreeing divorce bill, EU citizens' rights, how to solve Ireland(s). #NoProgress #Fluff
— People's NHS (@Peoples__NHS) September 22, 2017
Dear Theresa May,
Stop saying "control our borders" -we utterly control our borders. FoM is about rights of residence etc
— Mike Galsworthy (@mikegalsworthy) September 22, 2017
https://twitter.com/James4Labour/status/911226320306294785
I mind enormously that May speaks about the "British electorate" as if we were – or are – in agreement about Brexit. #florencespeech
— Dr Stella Duffy (@stellduffy) September 22, 2017
Theresa May couldn't name a single specific concession we've secured from the EU during negotiations. #florencespeech
— John Hyde (@JohnHyde1982) September 22, 2017
#bbcnews #Newsnight #TheresaMay produces flamboyant smokescreen in #FlorenceSpeech avoiding many key #brexit issueshttps://t.co/KwTcdzdH20
— Richard Corbett (@RichardGCorbett) September 22, 2017
Representatives of the EU were utterly non-plussed:
The @MichelBarnier response: "We look forward to UK's negotiators explaining concrete implications of May's speech" https://t.co/ycoZ1ghxcu
— Guardian politics (@GdnPolitics) September 22, 2017
But the most telling reaction has to be the response of the financial markets – here signified by trading on the Pound. Look what happened to Sterling during the speech:
When @theresa_may opens her mouth on the world stage, this is what happens. Oh my. #florencespeech pic.twitter.com/4gyg0xEowz
— Rachael Swindon (@Rachael_Swindon) September 22, 2017
Last word has to go to Labour’s Jeremy Corbyn – the man whose position Mrs May seems to have stolen wholesale. For him, it was hard to tell whether the biggest disappointment of the speech was the fact that it stated only things he had already explained, or the fact that none of the exotic location could be seen while it was being delivered by our robotic prime minister:
After @Theresa_May's #FlorenceSpeech, and 15 months since the EU referendum, the Tories are still no clearer about their plan for Brexit. pic.twitter.com/7ilFafOtzZ
— Jeremy Corbyn (@jeremycorbyn) September 22, 2017
Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
(but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:
Here are four ways to be sure you’re among the first to know what’s going on.
1) Register with us by clicking on ‘Subscribe’ (in the left margin). You can then receive notifications of every new article that is posted here.
2) Follow VP on Twitter @VoxPolitical
3) Like the Facebook page at https://www.facebook.com/VoxPolitical/
Join the Vox Political Facebook page.
4) You could even make Vox Political your homepage at http://voxpoliticalonline.com
And do share with your family and friends – so they don’t miss out!
If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!
Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.
The Livingstone Presumption is now available
in either print or eBook format here:
Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:
The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:
May’s script writers and Special Advisers write her bland, detail-free words, she speaks them with no comprehension of what they mean, and no comprehension of the irony that what she does is often the exact opposite of what the words mean, e.g. behind her on the wall in Florence: “Shared Future”…which she is trying to get out of! All her words, like “Strong and Stable” are just like Chapter Titles in a book, but apart from the titles all the pages are blank.
May’s Book of Chapter Titles.
She’s on another power grab aiming to secure her leadership position until Brexit is completed. She’s gambled that the Tories would not try to remove her for another 2 years while she is in the middle of negotiations. Nice one Tess.
Theresa May speaks only for a hard-line, extremely unpleasant, right wing cabal of the nasty Tory Party, who are totally incapable of working as partners alongside people from other nations. Neither I nor any of my family have never felt in any way “uncomfortable” with the EU. We have, however, felt distinctly uncomfortable with Tory governments.
direct accountability of our politicians, let’s look at some shining examples shall we!!!
1 the dwp/wca assessment process- coroner’s report, misconduct in public office, still making mistakes what happened- nothing
2. universal credit- a mess-still being rolled out despite causing issues
3. sanctions to the most vunerable
4 high levels of suicides- recognised that suicide is a issue and still carrying on with the high suicide assessment process.
5 reports against fitness to work assessors- complaints process- are they struck of/retrained, do they carry on as usual after a complaint- yes- so nothing is done
6.Millions spent on riot control vehicles for london to learn they cannot use them, what happens- Nothing – we needed high rise fire tenders
7 tory incompetence- growing by the day
Whilst I agree on May’s irrelevance and incompetence, it’s a bit rich coming from Labour when Corbyn got all his ideas from Nicola Sturgeon
This is ineptitude of the highest order! Did nobody, in either House, foresee this, when the Referendum Bill was voted on? Why did NOBODY plan for a £eave vote? Theresa May has WASTED so much time. What if she isn’t granted a transitional period? What plan has been made for that scenario? Why trigger Article 50 with no plan in place? That WAS her fault! What do she and her cronies think is going to happen? Aye, we want the best deal possible (whatever that transpired to be) but this is a negotiation. She said that she was keeping her cards close to her chest; so close, it would seem, that they have fallen down her top and been lost in the street! The country voted to leave the E.U. not this shambles (Jacob Rees-Mogg). This situation is unbelievable and painful to witness. Is there anybody who has a clue who can do something?