Bravo Simon Stevens, for saying what needed to be said (and making an important point about money)

Simon Stevens: He’s in charge of the NHS but Jeremy Hunt won’t give him enough money to do it properly.

Sue Jones has said this, so I don’t have to.

It is mischievous of Simon Stevens to refer to the £350 million a week that the Vote Leave campaign suggested was being paid to the EU and would be better spent on the NHS.

The UK never paid £350 million a week to the EU, so it is impossible for that amount of money to be ploughed into the NHS instead.

Furthermore, the money that is being paid to the EU – around £260 million or thereabouts – by rights would have to be split between policies the UK would have to take over as a nation from the EU.

It seems unlikely that a Tory government would put money into copying everything the EU did here, so some money will be left over.

But it won’t be £350 million a year.

Simon Stevens, the chief executive of NHS England has launched a scathing attack on government spending in an extraordinary conference speech, outlining that the NHS has a significant funding problem’.  He says the health service should get the cash boost it was promised during the EU referendum.

Speaking at the NHS Providers conference in Birmingham, Stevens said failure to increase funding would add at least one million people to NHS waiting lists by 2021.

He warned that cancer care and mental health services could deteriorate, and the waiting list for hospital operations hit 5m, because ministers are giving the services billions less than it needs.

In an impassioned speech, Stevens urged the prime minsiter to give the NHS in England at least £4bn more in 2018-19 – eight times more than currently proposed – in the budget Philip Hammond will deliver on 22 November. Stevens fired the controversial claims used by Vote Leave – that the NHS could benefit by £350m a week – back at the government, to put forward the strong case for more funding, in a major speech.

With waiting times worsening, he said trust in politics would be damaged if the NHS did not get more funding. He said that while the budget had apparently grown modestly in recent years, those rises would “nose-dive” in the next few years.  Stevens also expressed concerns that some elective treatments may have to be “retrenched or rationed”.

Source: Bravo Simon Stevens, for saying what needed to be said – Politics and Insights

Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:

Donate Button with Credit Cards

Here are four ways to be sure you’re among the first to know what’s going on.

1) Register with us by clicking on ‘Subscribe’ (in the left margin). You can then receive notifications of every new article that is posted here.

2) Follow VP on Twitter @VoxPolitical

3) Like the Facebook page at

Join the Vox Political Facebook page.

4) You could even make Vox Political your homepage at

And do share with your family and friends – so they don’t miss out!

If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!

Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.

The Livingstone Presumption is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:


8 thoughts on “Bravo Simon Stevens, for saying what needed to be said (and making an important point about money)

  1. rotzeichen

    Could it be that Simon Stevens smells the scent of panic in the government as the fight to stay afloat, and a general election in the offing.

    Simon Stevens of course is the architect of the NHS’s demise, he has rushed through all the changes to turn it into an off shore American health system, ripe for American companies to walk in and take them over when the crash comes.

    He could if he really meant it have said this years ago, instead with a change of government he wouldn’t want to take the blame for destroying the NHS – perhaps he thinks this might put the spotlight on a corrupt government that he happily worked with and in the full knowledge of its objectives.

  2. carolyn

    I wonder if he sees the writing on the wall and is keeping his options open re: the very real possibility of a change of government ?

  3. Roland Laycock

    Well well, so will these people be brought to book for telling lies NO, no wonder people don’t trust politicians and the media, its time thing changed and we had democracy

  4. Geoff Dunbar

    I’m afraid that I wouldn’t trust Simon Stevens with the NHS. Anything he says needs to be viewed with the utmost caution. NHS England is basically a ‘privatising monpoly’. His former employer, United health, is operating in the UK, with privileged ‘lead framework membership’. His connection to Davos, where he contributed to the reports on which the extremely damaging STPs are based – along with the creeping privatisation he is over seeing – make him an extremely dangerous figure.

  5. Barry Davies

    Indeed the £350 million a week net contribution is less than we actually pay, but as we are still paying it Stevens displayed his ignorance by asking where it is , answer going precisely where remainers voted for it to go out of the nation never to return.

    1. Mike Sivier Post author

      We actually pay much, much LESS than £350 million per week. This has been public knowledge for YEARS.
      My impression was that Mr Stevens was seeking an assurance that the promise would be honoured, and asking where that assurance was.

Comments are closed.