The Tories have lied about income inequality – they’ve only been counting around half the cash of the richest

[Image: Daily Mirror.]

It turns out the Tories have been lying about the gap between what the richest people earn and the pittances they allow to the poor.

They haven’t been including major contributors to the fortunes of the rich, like capital gains and inheritances, in their calculations.

The chancellor and the prime minister might not always see eye to eye, but on this at least they are in unison: income inequality is at its lowest since the mid-1980s.

The Conservatives are uncomfortable with the idea that they are the party of the 1%, so evidence to the contrary is mighty useful.

Look at the official data, the prime minister and the chancellor would say if challenged. It is not us saying that income inequality is at its lowest for three decades, it is the Office for National Statistics. Point proven.

Except that it isn’t. The government has two ways of calculating income inequality, and Hammond and May are using the one that best supports their argument. The ONS measure does indeed show inequality at a 30-year low but only because it doesn’t take account of what’s happening to the incomes of the top 1%.

An alternative measure provided by the Department for Work and Pensions, which takes more account of what is going on at the very top of the income distribution comes up with a different conclusion: inequality is not at a 30-year-low. At best it is flat, but it appears to be gently rising. Disraeli’s famous dictum about there being lies, damned lies and statistics springs to mind.

The discrepancy is the subject of a new report from the Resolution Foundation, a thinktank that focuses on the living standards of those on middle incomes and below. Research by the foundation’s Adam Corlett shows that both the ONS and DWP are failing fully to take account of the incomes of the very rich. Neither, for example, takes account of inheritance or capital gains, both of which are relevant when it comes to how income is distributed. But while neither are perfect, the ONS approach is particularly bad at capturing what is happening at the top.

“In the case of the top 0.1%, often only around half of income is captured. An attempt is made to correct this in Households Below Average Income (the DWP measure) using tax data from HMRC. No such attempt is currently made in the ONS’s ETB and so this data greatly underestimates the scale of top incomes. This has a large effect on inequality trends too, as the share of income going to the top has increased.”

Source: Income inequality is getting wider. If the stats count what counts | Inequality | The Guardian

Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:

Donate Button with Credit Cards

Here are four ways to be sure you’re among the first to know what’s going on.

1) Register with us by clicking on ‘Subscribe’ (in the left margin). You can then receive notifications of every new article that is posted here.

2) Follow VP on Twitter @VoxPolitical

3) Like the Facebook page at

Join the Vox Political Facebook page.

4) You could even make Vox Political your homepage at

And do share with your family and friends – so they don’t miss out!

If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!

Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.

The Livingstone Presumption is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:


5 thoughts on “The Tories have lied about income inequality – they’ve only been counting around half the cash of the richest

  1. Uriah

    There are no words in the English language that express my disdain, disgust, and hatred of the tories other than perhaps a certain anglo saxon C word said with feeling and venom out loud several hundred times.

  2. Neilth

    Please cease and desist from using the word ‘earn’ in relation to top persons remuneration. It is unlikely that any of them ‘earn’ what they take or have awarded themselves.

    Continuing to use ‘earn’ implies that their efforts merit such disproportionate amounts and devalues those who actually earn what they’re paid as well as doing a disservice to the English language which has a plethora of words to describe the thievery perpetrated by these economic pirates

    1. Mike Sivier Post author

      I tend to agree with this sentiment.
      What word would readers prefer me to use? Bear in mind that it must be one that is suitable for the general public to read.

Comments are closed.