If sexual misconduct claims are true, Brendan Cox may have done his wife’s memory serious harm

Brendan Cox [Image from Twitter].

Brendan Cox, widower of the murdered Labour MP Jo, has stepped down as a trustee of the charity set up in her name after sexual misconduct allegations were levelled against him.

They relate to his behaviour at the charity Save the Children in 2015, and his words suggest that he accepts there may be some truth to them.

He tweeted:

The thing is, if he took responsibility for his actions, he would have been better-advised to have considered their likely effect – not now, but in the immediate aftermath of his wife’s death.

It is inappropriate for a person who is responsible for sexual misconduct to take a prominent role in an organisation where he is seen to assume the moral high ground.

It would have been better for him to step back and allow another relative to take the lead. Nobody would have blamed a grieving husband for doing so.

Now, he has opened up both himself and the Jo Cox Foundation to possible accusations from those who have an opportunity to score political points from today’s revelation.

Personally, I don’t doubt that the charity is blameless – there is nothing false about it and there is no reason to believe that Mr Cox acted wrongly as a trustee.

Another important question is whether anybody at the Jo Cox Foundation was aware of the claims against him. I have experience of this sort of situation.

Readers of This Site will be aware that I have been accused of anti-Semitism and Holocaust denial by certain national newspapers.

The accusations are false – but they could do reputational damage to a charity with which I am involved.

So I made sure I alerted other members of the organisation to the fact at the earliest opportunity. As a result, I have their unanimous support, and that is extremely welcome.

If Mr Cox didn’t make the Foundation aware that allegations against him could cause reputational damage, then that’s another mark against him.

We are left with a situation in which Mr Cox’s alleged behaviour – and his failure to be open about it to his fellow trustees – may cause serious harm to the Jo Cox Foundation and its work.

I certainly hope that can be avoided – but I know that political opportunists, especially those of the far right, have absolutely no conscience in such matters.

Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:

Donate Button with Credit Cards

Here are four ways to be sure you’re among the first to know what’s going on.

1) Register with us by clicking on ‘Subscribe’ (in the left margin). You can then receive notifications of every new article that is posted here.

2) Follow VP on Twitter @VoxPolitical

3) Like the Facebook page at https://www.facebook.com/VoxPolitical/

Join the Vox Political Facebook page.

4) You could even make Vox Political your homepage at http://voxpoliticalonline.com

And do share with your family and friends – so they don’t miss out!

If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!

Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.

The Livingstone Presumption is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:


2 thoughts on “If sexual misconduct claims are true, Brendan Cox may have done his wife’s memory serious harm

  1. jeffrey davies

    while power riches and women effectively corrupt those at the top charities aint that anymore but a pawn of government

  2. hugosmum70

    what did he do? pinch some woman’s backside while drunk?thats been going on since time immemorial and no one tried to make cash out of it.honestly. some of these allegations are so minimal. its carrying abuse too far……….. i dont deny there’s a limit as to whats decent and what isn’t but touching a woman’s leg? yes a woman might object but its hardly grounds for an expensive court case. i think there’s a witch hunt going on these days. to find as many men as possible that are famous in the celebrity world and politics who touched a woman in some slightly inappropriate way and make mountains out of molehills. the worlds gone money mad.

Comments are closed.