The man who barred applications for membership of Labour for – among other things – “sharing inappropriate content” such as tweeting their love of the Foo Fighters has resigned as general secretary of the party.

According to the Labour Party’s official press release, Mr McNichol “decided to stand down as General Secretary of the Labour Party to pursue new projects on behalf of the party and wider Labour movement”.

Other sources suggest he was told to sling his hook by Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn, possibly as early as Tuesday, with Mr McNichol allowed to put his affairs in order and tender his resignation in order to save face.

The decision for him to go – no matter who made it – has been welcomed by, shall we say, a certain sector of the Labour membership. I refer to those who were denied membership in 2016, for a period just long enough to ensure they could not vote for Mr Corbyn in that year’s leadership election. The reasons were specious – in some cases they were ridiculous – and all the rejection letters were signed by Mr McNichol.

Rachael Swindon’s tweet refers to the case of Catherine Starr, whose application was rejected because of this tweet:

I don’t think the objectionable part was the swear word; I’m sure I’ve seen tweets by Labour MPs containing profanities, albeit perhaps not so extreme. And the message had nothing to do with the Labour Party or politics. Labour does have rules requiring members to hold themselves to a certain standard – installed after multiple allegations of anti-Semitism against members – but it seems extreme to apply those rules in this case.

That’s why some people are posting material like the following:

But let us be fair; Mr McNichol has his supporters too.

Of course, his detractors were swift to point out the logical errors here:

And while Mr McNichol may have been Gen Sec during a huge membership expansion, he wasn’t responsible for it. In fact, as we’ve seen, he tried very hard to restrict the membership boost created by Jeremy Corbyn’s election as leader in 2015.

The media will, of course, try to spin this as further evidence of the supposed “hard-left” takeover of the Labour Party. Apparently the return of democracy to at least one of the country’s main political parties is not to be welcomed.

At the end of the day, it seems this is the reason Mr McNichol had to go:

But who will replace him? HuffPost‘s Paul Waugh has a few ideas – although it seems his fact-checking skills aren’t what they ought to be:

At the end of the day, the least that can be said is, this is the end of an era for the Labour Party, with the departure of this controversial figure.

But, of course, it’s possible that commentators like This Writer have got it all wrong. What do you think?

Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:

Donate Button with Credit Cards

Here are four ways to be sure you’re among the first to know what’s going on.

1) Register with us by clicking on ‘Subscribe’ (in the left margin). You can then receive notifications of every new article that is posted here.

2) Follow VP on Twitter @VoxPolitical

3) Like the Facebook page at

Join the Vox Political Facebook page.

4) You could even make Vox Political your homepage at

And do share with your family and friends – so they don’t miss out!

If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!

Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.

The Livingstone Presumption is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here: