Jewish man suspended from membership of Labour Party – for anti-Semitism

Glyn Secker, secretary of Jewish Voices for Labour, has had his Labour Party membership suspended on allegations of anti-Semitism that have not been clarified.

If you’re surprised, don’t be. Several Labour members of Jewish origin have been suspended after others accused them of anti-Semitism.

It seems certain people have an axe to grind against those who have a different concept of their own religious and/or ethnic identity.

The latest incident involves Glyn Secker, secretary of Jewish Voices for Labour, and relates to allegations that he made anti-Semitic comments on social media.

Oh, really? Well, if he’s supposed to have made them on Twitter, it seems his accusers took a long time about it because he hasn’t posted there since mid-2016.

A cursory examination of his Facebook page doesn’t turn up anything that could be said to be overtly anti-Semitic, although there is a large amount of criticism aimed at the state of Israel. That’s not anti-Semitic, though – even the flawed IHRA definition of anti-Semitism admits that.

So This Writer tends to the opinion that the suspension has to do with claims that Mr Secker has made anti-Semitic comments at events in which he has been asked to speak – although I’ll happily stand corrected, should any solid allegations ever actually come to public attention.

One such event was a rally in Grosvenor Square, London, on January 6. Euan Philipps – one of the more rabid anti-Semitism accusers – claimed in one of his HuffPost articles that Mr Secker was “filmed making antisemitic slurs” at the event.

But an account of the speech, here, while also claiming anti-Semitism on Mr Secker’s part, appears to show only criticism of Israel.

Even the allegation that the Board of Secretaries of British Jews has hosted the EDL at demonstrations – not the first time many of us have seen that claim, I’m sure – is a political criticism, not an anti-Semitic slur. Although, certainly, saying a thing doesn’t make it true.

The evidence – or lack of it – therefore tends to corroborate the JVL claim, below, that the allegations are unsubstantiated.

And the connected claim also rings true – that the use of such nebulous claims to punish Labour Party members without knowledge of charges, on the word of those who oppose their politics, does more to bring Labour into disrepute than anything else.

I wonder why this suspension has happened now. Is it because the chairman of the Jewish Labour Movement is currently under investigation over financial irregularities in that organisation? Such claims – if substantiated – would certainly put both Jeremy Newmark and the JLM into disrepute.

Is it because Iain McNicol has resigned as Labour’s general secretary? Many believe Mr McNicol was a strong ally of the section of Labour’s Jewish constituency that likes to accuse others.

Those suggestions must certainly be food for thought.

As a victim of false allegations of anti-Semitism, I can certainly agree with JVL’s closing sentiments. Anti-Semitism is monstrous – but false allegations of anti-Semitism are monstrous too.

The call for the charges against Mr Secker to be dropped is naive, though. There is absolutely no substance to the claims about me, but it seems I may face expulsion from the Labour Party on the basis of those fabrications.

Labour’s disputes procedure is a mockery, with members likely to be expelled without ever knowing the exact charges against them or the identity of their accusers.

It’s ridiculous – as some commentators have noted.

Greg Hadfield, for example, tweeted: “Why target Jewish members, for “anti-semitism”? While you’re at it, why not also target black members, for racism; or also target women members, for misogyny; or even target any/all members, for socialism? Does any of this make any sense at all?

Ah, but then Mr Hadfield has been accused of anti-Semitism as well, hasn’t he?

Here’s a thought: False allegations of anti-Semitism must qualify as uncomradely behaviour – which is also an offence according to Labour Party rules.

How many of those who’ve falsely accused their comrades have faced that allegation as a result? I’m betting the answer is none.

In an extraordinary development, JVL Secretary Glyn Secker, longtime Jewish activist, Executive Committee member and Director of Jews for Justice for Palestinians and captain of the Jewish Boat to Gaza in 2009, has been suspended from membership of the Labour Party.

Here are the charges: “Allegations that you may have been involved in a breach of Labour Party rules have been brought to the attention of national officers of the Party. These allegations relate to comments made on social media that may be in (sic) anti Semitic and therefore in breach of Labour Party rules.” They can’t even get the grammar right!

No accuser is known, the charge is appallingly vague, no evidence produced. But so seriously does the Head of Disputes, Sam Mathews, take the matter that Glyn cannot attend any party meeting including Annual Conference (that’s in September, six months away – Mathews clearly doesn’t think this will be resolved in a hurry!). And he has the gall to say: “In view of the urgency to protect the Party’s reputation in the present situation…”

Nothing is doing more to bring the Party into disrepute than the shocking use of unsubstantiated allegations to punish active members of the left without  knowledge of charges, on the merest say-so of those who oppose their political stance, and in defiance of the recommendations of the Chakrabarti Report which was adopted a year-and-a-half ago by the NEC – but on which no action has been taken towards its effective implementation.

This is an absurd, politically-motivated attack on our Secretary and our organisation. We call on our supporters to move motions of censure in their branches and CLPs. To use allegations of antisemitism in this way is an abuse of power, and a degrading of the seriousness of actual antisemitism and other forms of racism. While antisemitism is monstrous – and, like all forms of racism, should be vigorously dealt with – false accusations of antisemitism are monstrous too. We call for the immediate lifting of these charges.

Source: A JVL Statement on the suspension of its Secretary Glyn Secker from the Labour Party – for “antisemitism”!!! • Jewish Voice for Labour

Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:

Donate Button with Credit Cards

Here are four ways to be sure you’re among the first to know what’s going on.

1) Register with us by clicking on ‘Subscribe’ (in the left margin). You can then receive notifications of every new article that is posted here.

2) Follow VP on Twitter @VoxPolitical

3) Like the Facebook page at

Join the Vox Political Facebook page.

4) You could even make Vox Political your homepage at

And do share with your family and friends – so they don’t miss out!

If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!

Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.

The Livingstone Presumption is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:


14 thoughts on “Jewish man suspended from membership of Labour Party – for anti-Semitism

  1. jaguarjon

    So hard-line has the official position become in Israeli affairs that it’s possible to say that the strength of Jeremy Corbyn’s Labour is regarded as a threat to Israeli ‘policy’ regarding the Palestinians. They know a Labour Government would insist on justice for Palestine and mean it.
    Israel is therefore running an operation to cause as much turmoil as possible in Labour’s ranks to diminish the Party in voters’eyes. It uses up time and energy in a pointless internecine conflict and refutation of bogus smears and counter-smears.
    The organisations which police Britain’s current supine attitude to Israel aren’t exactly famous for their principles or morality. They are dirty propaganda agitators.
    We must expect much more of the same and worse in the times to come. Buckle up, it’s going to get rough.

  2. Chris O’Donovan

    Can you suggest a model motion
    Who should we censure: the NEC or the Disputes Committee/ or Sam Matthews?

  3. MadManagement

    I think there are some real loonies in the PLP over the Jewish issue. That’s OK. That’s life. But why, in the name of God, are they taken seriously and the real victims punished. It is like a knee jerk reaction to any criticism that has Israel or Jewish in it.
    Please grow up.

  4. john thatcher

    Maybe this is JLM and their “useful idiots” demonstrating they still have power in spite of the removal of their favourite go-fer McNicol.

    1. Mike Sivier Post author

      He hasn’t gone yet. Maybe it’s a last-gasp attempt to exercise that power.

  5. Martin Odoni

    As I wrote last month; at the moment, false accusations of anti-Semitism are becoming MORE monstrous than anti-Semitism itself, partly because they’re very difficult to combat.

  6. Jim Denham

    I don’t know enough to comment one way or the other on the specific case of Glyn Secker (though I’d accept that his suspension does indeed seem unfair in terms of lack of due process and excessive in terms of anything he’s done or said that could reasonably be considered anti-Semitic).

    However, the article’s predication – that people of “Jewish origin” cannot possibly be guilty of anti-Semitism, is plainly wrong. Think of Gilad Atzmon, for one. Many of Norman Finkelstein’s pronouncements come very, very close to the edge – and IMHO cross that edge. IMHO the same goes for Greenstein – who also throws in misogyny just to add to the toxic mix produced by his abuse.

    1. Mike Sivier Post author

      It’s an interesting debate. The accusers say only Jews can judge whether someone is anti-Semitic or not – and then go on to accuse Jews. Surely those they accuse are perfectly capable of judging for themselves?

      It seems to me that a great many participants in this debate are trying to face in two directions at the same time.

      1. Mike Sivier Post author

        I don’t have to. Mr Secker has been reinstated – apparently after Labour found no evidence against him.
        It seems the accusations were malicious.
        I await the naming of the accuser and the announcement of an investigation into his or her behaviour.

      2. rotzeichen

        Jim Denham, back on the topic of anti-Semitism, he regularly attacked attacked Corbyn supporters on Shiraz Socialist, I have no doubt he will respond to this comment.

        Tony Greenstein a person he mentions; regulary writes an anti Zionist blog and anyone can google what he says, I would recommend people judge Tony on what he writes himself, not what people like Jim Denham tell us about him.

Comments are closed.