Would the Salisbury poisoning have happened if the Tories hadn’t scrapped the regiment dealing with chemical attacks?

Contaminated: Investigators examine the park bench in Salisbury where Sergei Skripal and his daughter Yulia were found after they were poisoned – an incident that may not have happened, had the Conservatives not disbanded the military regiment that handled such attacks.

Labour created a military regiment dedicated to fighting threats such as the use of nerve agents to harm UK citizens in the 1990s – but the Conservatives cut it as part of their Austerity measures in 2011.

It was one of many, many cuts that the Tories inflicted on the country, weakening our ability to combat not only terror attacks but also attacks from foreign aggressors.

It seems clear that the poisoning of Sergei Skripal might hot have happened, had the Tories not “neglected and underfunded” – the Tories’ own words! – specialist military expertise to deal with the threat.

Today’s (March 13) BBC Daily Politics show featured a vox pop in which a majority of the people of Bexleyheath said Austerity has not been worth it.

As I write this, Philip Hammond is desperately trying to get us all to believe the opposite.

Would Sergei Skripal say Austerity was worth it? Would his daughter Yulia? How about DS Nick Bailey, who was also poisoned by the nerve agent in Salisbury?

How about the 120,000 people who died because of Tory health and social care cuts?

How about the countless (literally – the Tories refuse to count them) sick and disabled people who died because of Tory benefit changes?

Mr Hammond is desperately trying to convince us of a lie that the Tories are responsible enough to run the UK for the benefit of everbody.

In fact they are genocidal to the vulnerable, and have deliberately devastated our national defences against foreign aggressors. They are a menace that must be eliminated.

Defence chiefs are urgently reviewing how to upgrade the military’s ability to protect against chemical, biological and radiation attacks following the Salisbury poisoning.

The use of a military-grade nerve agent in an attempted assassination on the streets of Britain, as well as the brazen use of poison gas in Syria, has increased fears about the use of the weapons by states and terrorist groups.

Whitehall sources said it was now accepting specialist military expertise to deal with the threat had been neglected and underfunded after the 2010 cost-cutting defence review.

Source: The military’s chemical, biological and radiation expertise ‘could be boosted’ in wake of the Salisbury poisoning

Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:

Donate Button with Credit Cards

Here are four ways to be sure you’re among the first to know what’s going on.

1) Register with us by clicking on ‘Subscribe’ (in the left margin). You can then receive notifications of every new article that is posted here.

2) Follow VP on Twitter @VoxPolitical

3) Like the Facebook page at https://www.facebook.com/VoxPolitical/

Join the Vox Political Facebook page.

4) You could even make Vox Political your homepage at http://voxpoliticalonline.com

And do share with your family and friends – so they don’t miss out!

If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!

Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.

The Livingstone Presumption is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:


7 thoughts on “Would the Salisbury poisoning have happened if the Tories hadn’t scrapped the regiment dealing with chemical attacks?

  1. Barry

    It wasn’t scrapped it is in Salisbury working today, the senior officer was being interviewed

  2. aunty1960

    Probably not if someone wants to squirt an atomiser of deadly chemical agent you are dead no chance and if someone jabs a hypodermic syringe in the back of your leg hidden in a rolled up umbrella handle you are stuffed

    But intelligence has been cut cut cut and HORROR OF HORRORS British intelligence and gathering has been turned over to private coporations which have access and see the data first


    Very intriguing though

  3. aunty1960

    But they some activists, bloggers journalists investigators and scientists have ended up dead too

    Dont drink tea or eat sushi with strangers

  4. Stu

    I’m actually getting confused by this whole issue.
    Porton Down Chemical Weapons Research Facility is only a few miles up the road – can our Government assure us that all of it’s stock is intact?

  5. Florence

    One has to ask – given the total destruction of Russian CW labs and stocks under international supervision many years ago, and the prevailing international (USA) political sabre rattling, why would Russia use a weapon designed for WMD application for an assassination of an MI5 agent in the UK?

    None of it makes sense, apart from the physical proximity of Salisbury to Porton Down.

Comments are closed.