It’s war: Trump drags the UK into air strikes on Syrian ‘chemical weapons’ targets
Here it is, then:
BREAKING: Pres. Trump orders strikes on Syrian targets following last week's suspected chemical weapons attack in Douma, Syria. pic.twitter.com/lTNEvJvyf9
— ABC News Politics (@ABCPolitics) April 14, 2018
You heard him – Donald Trump has dragged France and the United Kingdom into pointless air strikes against targets in Syria that are believed to manufacture chemical weapons.
Footage from #Damascus shows air defence missiles being launched. Location not specified. #SyriaStrikes pic.twitter.com/EqTUYBeNq0
— Riam Dalati (@Dalatrm) April 14, 2018
There was no vote in the US Congress, just as there has been no vote in the UK’s Parliament. These strikes have no democratic legitimacy at all.
And the British public don’t want them:
With an attack on Syria looking imminent, YouGov reveals only 22% of Brits would support missile attacks on the Syrian military – almost twice as many (43%) are opposed https://t.co/Fsa01RCi4t pic.twitter.com/Yy9QxSSBR1
— YouGov (@YouGov) April 12, 2018
Public opinion on the social media is – well, see for yourself:
My tip is not to bomb Syria but instead spending that money building council houses for all the homeless people in this country. #NotInMyNameTheresaMay pic.twitter.com/PM9va7uIcv
— Shlomo (@hapoelorient) April 12, 2018
It's always important to to remember that all those politicians who are calling for deadly retaliation against Syria know that when the war escalates; it won't be their children put in harms way when we need to put boots on the ground. #Syriawar
— John Smith (son of Harry Leslie Smith) (@Harryslaststand) April 12, 2018
#NotInMyNameTheresaMay pic.twitter.com/VmgKBEIvKu
— UnityNewsUK 🕊 Palestine Affiliated Media (@UnityNewsIndie) April 12, 2018
https://twitter.com/Angry_Voice/status/984435857749938176
How on earth can @theresa_may justify skipping Parliament to go to war, on the say so of grotesquely inept fools like Johnson & Grayling? The most serious decision a PM can make is taking a country to war, but doing that without Parliament agreeing is job ending. #NoWarToriesOut
— Rachael Swindon (@Rachael_Swindon) April 12, 2018
I was 12 when Iraq kicked off. I knew it was a mistake then. I know action in Syria is a mistake now.
My enemy is not Syria. My enemy is the Tory government. #NotInMyNameTheresaMay
— mike 🚩🇵🇸🔻 (@__mike91) April 11, 2018
https://twitter.com/TheMendozaWoman/status/984726487621361664
We can fund another war in the Middle East but we can’t afford to feed some of the most vulnerable schoolchildren in the country.#NotInMyNameTheresaMay
— Hasan Patel 🌹 (@CorbynistaTeen) April 11, 2018
Israel is mowing down unarmed protesters & journalists in Palestine. Saudi Arabia is bombing & starving the people of Yemen. The UK government keep selling weapons to Israel & Saudi Arabia. But suddenly the British political establishment want to bomb Syria to save Arab lives? 🤔
— Another Angry Voice (@Angry_Voice) April 12, 2018
Jeremy Corbyn has been the voice of reason in this – as with so many other issues lately. He demanded that Parliament should have a chance to debate any proposed military action – especially as it risks a huge escalation of conflict in the Middle East:
https://twitter.com/gaurangmorjaria/status/984392719832420353
It is vital that parliament has the chance to debate and decide in advance on any government proposals to support a new US-led military intervention in Syria, which risks a dangerous escalation of the conflict.
— Jeremy Corbyn (@jeremycorbyn) April 12, 2018
But Theresa May was determined – absolutely adamant – that this was a chance to show her utter weakness.
I know she thinks it will be a display of strength, but Mr Corbyn had it right when he said she was sitting by the phone, “waiting for instructions” to do whatever Donald Trump told her.
Because the way to show a violent, brutal despot who uses military force whenever he wants how democracy works is to use military force whenever you want. pic.twitter.com/oS4R1uVNus
— David Schneider (@davidschneider) April 12, 2018
Here’s her statement. She is trying to look like a statesperson – speaking slowly and seriously:
The Prime Minister @theresa_may has made a statement on Syria: https://t.co/bBfYyowUIo pic.twitter.com/QlTeFXmOkt
— UK Prime Minister (@10DowningStreet) April 14, 2018
But she just looks like she’s patronising us – talking down, treating us all like children.
Mrs May’s Cabinet backed her plan to support action in Syria on Friday (April 13). And look at this:
Clear effort to link it to Salisbury attack. No.10: "further example of the erosion of international law in relation to the use of chemical weapons".
— Ian Dunt (@IanDunt) April 12, 2018
So the plan has been to link Russia into the Syrian chemical attack, using the dubious connection of a chemical attack here in the UK, to which Russia has not been successfully linked?
That is miserably weak.
It comes after Syrian President Bashar al-Assad invited UN chemical weapons inspectors – the now-ubiquitous Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons – to investigate the attack that triggered the current hostilities, in Douma. They were due to arrive today (April 14).
Russia has warned that western military strikes would risk triggering a much larger war.
Is this what Trump, May and possibly even Macron want?
Interestingly, the French president spoke with Russian president Vladimir Putin only yesterday. Both agreed to aid the OPCW inspectors in Syria wherever possible, and to ensure their foreign and defence ministers stayed in close contact, to prevent the situation from escalating.
France’s contribution to the air strikes must seem a betrayal. How will that affect the wider international situation?
UPDATE 3.10am: According to the US military, all planned airstrikes have been carried out and no further action is currently being contemplated.
The bad news is that the United States did not notify Russia of its attacks.
Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
(but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:
Here are four ways to be sure you’re among the first to know what’s going on.
1) Register with us by clicking on ‘Subscribe’ (in the left margin). You can then receive notifications of every new article that is posted here.
2) Follow VP on Twitter @VoxPolitical
3) Like the Facebook page at https://www.facebook.com/VoxPolitical/
Join the Vox Political Facebook page.
4) You could even make Vox Political your homepage at http://voxpoliticalonline.com
And do share with your family and friends – so they don’t miss out!
If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!
Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.
The Livingstone Presumption is now available
in either print or eBook format here:
Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:
The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:
this lot in power need to be taken through traitors gate
Well it’s very nice of them to help Isis out don’t you think how dare Trump make war he’s got no right to drag the Uk into this he should do it for him self May never asked either who does she think she is no do Trumps bidding wrong so very wrong
Why did the USA, England and France want to drop bombs on the very places the Chemical weapons inspectors would want to visit today?
It seems to me that the Tory government didn’t have to be “dragged” into yet another regime changing war. They have been thirsting for war for years now. These people are dangerous and need to be removed ASAP.
chemical weapons my ass this was a setup from the start and Democracy as gone it the UK
What these people come to the UK and kill people blame Mrs may it will come
Both Drumpf and May want their “Falklands Moments” but unlike last time when we faced down Argentina this will be going against Russia. Drumpf would relish the prospect of WW3 to feed his enormous ego.
Under international law, military strikes by the United States of America and its allies against the Syrian Arab Republic, unless conducted in self-defence or with United Nations Security Council approval, are illegal and constitute acts of aggression.
Curiously on the front page of the Telegraph it says that May was going to consult Parliament before spending the estimated £4m on this childish, vanity folly
I have written my letter to the ‘Trump Lackey’ and her gang of moronic, millionaire warmongers demanding resignations for their cack-handed, cunning manipulation, bare-faced contempt, willful defiance of the last vestiges of ‘democracy’ and gargantuan incompetence: I trust that millions of other like-minded, civilized UK residents will do the same!