Did Mrs May try to manipulate Parliament by sharing Syria intelligence with those who support airstrikes?
Theresa May has been accused of a grave abuse of her position, after it was claimed that her national security adviser gave Labour MPs intelligence and security briefings on Syria, on the basis of their support for air strikes.
If the allegation is true, it means that people who were not cleared to receive this information were provided with it – implying a possible breach of the UK’s national security.
The allegation has been made by Scottish Nationalist Party MP Stewart McDonald:
“Intelligence and security briefings on Syria have been used by the Government to manipulate Labour MPs, the Commons has heard.
“The SNP’s Stewart McDonald (Glasgow South) claimed he was informed by several sources that the Government has been “selectively offering” briefings by the Prime Minister’s national security adviser.
“He added they appear to have been offered to Labour MPs who are “sympathetic” to the Government’s position.
“Mr McDonald, raising a point of order in the House of Commons, said: “It’s been brought to my attention by several sources that the Government has been selectively offering intelligence and security briefings by the Prime Minister’s national security adviser on the current situation in Syria and the UK military response to it.
“”These briefings appear to have been offered to members of the Labour opposition not on the basis of privy counsellor status but on the basis of those Opposition members who are sympathetic to the Government’s position.
“”That leads to concerns that the Government is using intelligence briefings to manipulate Parliament and to bolster its own case for its behaviour on the Opposition benches – not on security terms, but on politics.””
Mr McDonald repeated his claim on Twitter:
Several sources have told me that the Prime Minister’s National Security Adviser has given Labour MPs intelligence & security briefings on Syria, not on the basis that they are Privy Councillors – and therefore security cleared – but instead to those who support air strikes. https://t.co/d51QBf9Wea
— Stewart McDonald MP (@StewartMcDonald) April 17, 2018
This is a deeply serious matter. I will be taking this issue up with the government to ensure we get to the bottom of the issue.
— Stewart McDonald MP (@StewartMcDonald) April 17, 2018
He received a predictable reaction:
If true, this is a scandal. https://t.co/bHqYNM0nPb
— Rachael Swindon (@Rachael_Swindon) April 17, 2018
But Commons Speaker John Bercow merely told the MP that it was for the government to decide with whom it shares intelligence material.
The corruption implicit in the allegation cannot be overlooked, though – especially as it may be placed alongside other recent Tory tactics.
For example:
"If you don't support immediate military intervention you are responsible for any deaths that occur!"
Imagine if this argument applied to inaction on austerity, the refugee crisis, global inequality, lack of access to clean water etc etc.
— Something Something ~Fiscal Rules~ 🇵🇸 (@LamentablyAwake) April 17, 2018
Then there’s the response to people like Mr McDonald, who dare to question the narrative:
Hello children, you live in a country which is a world policeman. No one gave the UK this job. The UK took it and it means your country bombs places where it wants to have influence or wants to help the USA have power. If you ask why, some MPs will say you’re helping tyrants.
— Michael Rosen 💙💙🎓🎓 (@MichaelRosenYes) April 16, 2018
Such a response is no doubt on its way to former First Sea Lord, Lord West (if it hasn’t reached him already), after he told BBC News he does not believe the claim that Syrian President Bashar al Assad ordered the alleged chemical weapons attack on Douma that triggered Mrs May’s decision to take part in air strikes on alleged (again) chemical weapons installations.
We have already heard that these alleged installations were nothing of the sort, and that the evidence from Douma was of people being treated for dust inhalation rather than a chemical weapons attack. Now this:
⭕ Lord West tells @BBCNews: “It doesn’t ring true [that Assad carried out this chemical attack]. We know that in the past some of the Islamic groups have used chemicals and of course there would be huge benefit for them in labelling an attack as coming from Assad.” #SyriaDebate pic.twitter.com/T08gDkJVSw
— Rob (@robn1980) April 17, 2018
He went on to say he would have advised Assad’s opponents to stage a chemical attack – which is very nearly what Russia warned was planned, days before the alleged attack in Douma (although the Russians said a fake attack was to take place):
⭕ Quite literally a bombshell from Lord West on @BBCNews as he admits that he would advise those fighting Assad to stage a chemical attack for strategical purposes: “I would say wait until there’s another attack by Assad’s forces and we must set off some chlorine.” #SyriaDebate pic.twitter.com/RSKkAEJCgE
— Rob (@robn1980) April 17, 2018
And he downplayed the validity of the reports from Douma which were used to justify the air strikes:
⭕ Lord West: “The reports that have come from #Douma are from the White Helmets who are not neutral, and the World Health Organisation doctors who are embedded with the groups fighting Assad. They are not neutral.” #SyriaDebate pic.twitter.com/U8puKvRv6C
— Rob (@robn1980) April 17, 2018
And there is one more inconsistency – raised via another current news story. That is Theresa May’s utter failure of compassion for human beings of foreign origin (or indeed, UK residents).
The Windrush scandal has shown that Mrs May does not care about the suffering of other human beings; in fact, she does everything she can to cause it.
So I tend to agree with Tom, below:
Given her disgusting track record at the Home Office the idea that Theresa May gives the faintest damn about the suffering of other human beings is ridiculous, which makes her stated justification of the Syria airstrikes (humanitarian concern) completely & utterly unbelievable.
— Another Angry Voice (@Angry_Voice) April 17, 2018
If you agree as well, then it seems Mrs May has been trying to deceive the citizens of the United Kingdom with a fraud so huge that, if proved, she should be taken out of Parliament and thrown in the deepest, darkest prison cell we have – permanently.
So let’s get on with proving it.
Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
(but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:
Here are four ways to be sure you’re among the first to know what’s going on.
1) Register with us by clicking on ‘Subscribe’ (in the left margin). You can then receive notifications of every new article that is posted here.
2) Follow VP on Twitter @VoxPolitical
3) Like the Facebook page at https://www.facebook.com/VoxPolitical/
Join the Vox Political Facebook page.
4) You could even make Vox Political your homepage at http://voxpoliticalonline.com
And do share with your family and friends – so they don’t miss out!
If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!
Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.
The Livingstone Presumption is now available
in either print or eBook format here:
Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:
The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:
The whole issue of war against Syria stinks of corruption, hypocrisy and dishonesty.
I think the only way ‘the International Gurning Champion and her cabinet of clowns’ are ever likely to ‘reshape’ the Middle East is by resigning en-masse and making one last memorable trip to that area together with their camp followers. Then, as collective penance for their interminable list of crimes against humanity and morality they can hurl themselves ‘as-one’ (without chutes of course) from a suitable, slow moving transport circling around 18000′. Only this way can they ever hope to make a big ‘impact’ and leave a lasting ‘impression’! The MSM would have a ‘field’ day!!!