Toxic Theresa May’s “hostile environment” is the worst scandal of recent years. She must resign or be removed
Theresa May must go. She can resign, or she can be forced out – I don’t mind which – but she cannot be allowed to stay.
The appointment of Sajid Javid – a BAME minister who Mrs May doesn’t like, let’s not forget (she demoted him when she became PM) – seems to be a token gesture: “Let’s put a second-generation migrant, son-of-a-Pakistani-bus-driver in as Home Secretary and everybody will think we’ve changed – so we won’t have to.”
And – bearing in mind it’s more than a week since the Windrush scandal broke – nothing has changed so far. Let’s consider what that means, with a summary of Mrs May’s attacks on immigrants – both legal and otherwise – courtesy of Dylan Strain on Twitter:
It was Theresa who in 2010 raised the price of APPLYING for indefinite leave to remain to £849. By 2015 the fee was £1,500 and today it's £2,389 – not for a family, but for every member of it.
(Thread of Theresa May's wrong doing below) #WindrushScandalhttps://t.co/9k3DKYBSNx— Dylan George (@DylanStrain) April 28, 2018
'It was Theresa who, in 2012, declared an intention "to create here in Britain a really hostile environment for illegal migration". She set up a task force known as the Hostile Environment Working Group to force other parts of the state could do UKBA's job'
— Dylan George (@DylanStrain) April 28, 2018
It was Theresa who, that same year, sent out 'Go Home' vans. It was Theresa's department that produced advice for people deported to Jamaica advising them to put on an accent and "try to be Jamaican".
— Dylan George (@DylanStrain) April 28, 2018
It was Theresa who has been asked, for years, by refugee and migrant charities to close the loophole. Whose department was laid siege to by community law projects acting for those who could not afford lawyers. Who still doesn't know if the people she ignored are here or there.
— Dylan George (@DylanStrain) April 28, 2018
It was Theresa who was PM when Black History Month launched a petition demanding an immigration amnesty for the Windrush migrants in October, and which despite passing 170,000 signatures is still being "considered' for Parliamentary debate.
— Dylan George (@DylanStrain) April 28, 2018
It was Theresa who three days ago refused to meet the Commonwealth leaders when they were all in London, and caved in only after the Daily Mail declared it a scandal.
— Dylan George (@DylanStrain) April 28, 2018
The fact the people who have suffered as a result of Theresa May's "really hostile environment" are browner, poorer and less able to be heard renders her claims of being a champion of social justice utterly laughable.
— Dylan George (@DylanStrain) April 28, 2018
'Theresa May might not be a racist – but she's presided over the most racist, disgraceful abomination in recent British history. She allowed it to grow to such massive proportions that it's now a stain upon our national character.'
— Dylan George (@DylanStrain) April 28, 2018
'But it'll probably be Amber Rudd's fault, because she voted Remain and won't get in a car with Boris Johnson.'
— Dylan George (@DylanStrain) April 28, 2018
Not only did Mrs May allow this “abomination” to grow to such proportions that it is now a “stain on our national character” – she rewarded those who were responsible for it:
Interesting: Three years ago 2014/15 head of “Immigration Enforcement” Home office agency created by May to increase deportations and that was charged with delivering on internal numerical targets received a bonus of between £5k and £10k, according to Home Office Annual Report: pic.twitter.com/Y08cKItjo3
— Faisal Islam (@faisalislam) April 30, 2018
When Mrs May became unelected prime minister (remember: she became Conservative leader because her opponent stood down, and at last year’s general election she lost her party’s Parliamentary majority), she appointed Amber Rudd as Home Secretary. At the 2016 Tory conference Ms Rudd gave an address that led to her being reported to the police on a charge of making racist hate speech.
Ms Rudd wrote a letter to Mrs May in January 2017, promising to increase deportations of people the Conservative government has decided should no longer be allowed to live in the UK by 10 per cent. I cannot, in good conscience, say that this policy was directed at illegal immigrants – as the Conservatives are rather desperately trying to assert – because it has become clear that people with every right to remain in this country were targeted from the moment Mrs May became Home Secretary, never mind Ms Rudd.
So to clarify, Amber Rudd was running out of illegal immigrants to kick out of the UK in order to meet her quotas, she then had a light bulb moment and thought 🤔 let’s go after Legal POC residents, lock em up in detention centres, no one will notice and Theresa May agreed.
— Natalie Rowe (@RealNatalieRowe) April 30, 2018
(I’m not sure Natalie Rowe’s suggestion is accurate; we don’t know that this was the intention. But it is certainly what happened, and we may deduce that legal residents were targeted in order to meet the increased targets being demanded by Ms Rudd and Mrs May.)
Last week, Ms Rudd lied to a Parliamentary committee, claiming that there were no deportation targets. Then she lied to the Commons themselves, saying she had not known the targets existed – despite having set them in January last year. When her letter discussing these targets with Mrs May became public, she had no choice other than to resign.
Rudd lied.
May knew Rudd lied.
May did nothing.
May failed in her duty as PM to preserve the fundamental standards required in a democracy.
May must go.— Tom London (@TomLondon6) May 1, 2018
Instead of going, Mrs May is trying to draw a line under the matter. But the fact exists that she did receive a letter from Amber Rudd discussing deportation targets.
James O’Brien discussed the implications on his LBC show:
So – as Rachael Maskell argued in Parliament, it seems Amber Rudd was the scapegoat – just one more of Mrs May’s subordinates who was sacked for carrying out her policies:
Is Amber Rudd the Prime Ministers scapegoat for the Windrush crisis? Full clip here: https://t.co/iT82RTjlGo pic.twitter.com/UmGuKBtkYJ
— 💙Rachael Maskell MP (@RachaelMaskell) May 1, 2018
Mrs May herself has confirmed that she knew the Home Office had targets for the removal of illegal immigrants. Note the word “illegal”. She said: “When I was home secretary, yes, there were targets in terms of removing people from the country, who were here illegally.”
But she didn’t lift a finger when it became clear that people with every right to be in the UK were also being deported – and, as Dylan Strain has pointed out in his Twitter thread (above), she has known for years.
So the argument that Mrs May is in the clear because she may not have heard Amber Rudd misleading a committee, or may not have bothered about it because Ms Rudd corrected what she said the following morning, simply doesn’t add up. Ms Rudd’s correction was also a lie and Mrs May knew it, because she knew all about the targets. But she still allowed her MPs to make public displays of support for Ms Rudd, despite knowing that they were based on false information.
It implies an intention to mislead the public, from which Mrs May cannot slither away.
We should tackle the use of “illegal immigration” by Conservative MPs.
Every single Tory MP brings up "illegal immigration" immediately they're questioned about Windrush. They've agreed on it as the party line.
Isn't it a disgrace our media's letting them get away with it and even parroting it?— Tweets by Sue (@marthasydenham) April 30, 2018
It is, indeed, a disgrace. The prime minister of the UK has known for years that legal citizens of the UK were being targeted by her “hostile environment” policy, that she and her party are still claiming was aimed at “illegal immigration”. If she had done anything at all to stop legal citizens being targeted, then they might be justified in using this excuse. She did not, so they are not.
Now we have a new Home Secretary, Sajid Javid – just another human shield for Mrs May, as Owen Jones explains:
Theresa May has replaced one human shield with another. She is responsible for the Windrush scandal – and she must resign over it. https://t.co/rqlp9f7lcb
— Owen Jones (@OwenJones84) April 30, 2018
And the “hostile environment” policy goes on – renamed the “compliant environment” by Mr Javid. Those two words mask a multitude of sinister – no, call them what they are: downright evil – meanings, as David Lammy explained:
The hostile environment is not about illegal immigration. It is about creating a hostile environment for anyone who looks like they could be an immigrant. An unjust law is no law at all. 230 years after the abolitionists I stand in Parliament and ask Am I Not A Man And A Brother? pic.twitter.com/Jvt62miJMk
— David Lammy (@DavidLammy) April 30, 2018
These crimes against UK citizens are still happening, with the blessing of Theresa May’s government – and will continue happening as long as she is prime minister.
Mrs May has inflicted the policy on the country and has lied repeatedly and bare-facedly in order to keep it going. It is intolerable. She must not be allowed to get away with it. We must demand her resignation – or removal.
Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
(but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:
Here are four ways to be sure you’re among the first to know what’s going on.
1) Register with us by clicking on ‘Subscribe’ (in the left margin). You can then receive notifications of every new article that is posted here.
2) Follow VP on Twitter @VoxPolitical
3) Like the Facebook page at https://www.facebook.com/VoxPolitical/
Join the Vox Political Facebook page.
4) You could even make Vox Political your homepage at http://voxpoliticalonline.com
And do share with your family and friends – so they don’t miss out!
If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!
Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.
The Livingstone Presumption is now available
in either print or eBook format here:
Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:
The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:
This is great work, Mike. Thanks, and well done. :-)
Just for once May is correct, there should be a hostile environment for illegal migrants, they have no right to be here, and no matter how many bumbling idiots labour have trying to pretend they have the right to remain it remains illegal means they should not be here.
The problem is that her policy doesn’t just target illegal immigrants – it targets UK citizens.
Have you not understood that?
Labour has never tried to pretend that illegal immigrants have a right to remain in the UK.
Please at least try to understand the facts of this matter.
DFTT – they get a bonus when you bite!
I just hope that May isn’t let off the hook on this one. The pressure on her to resign should continue unabated.
Much as I agree with your sentiments about May, I can’t help the feeling of “better the devil you know”. If she resigns, who do you suppose would take over? I suspect they would have no different opinion on immigration and would be considerably worse on most other issues. Maybe better to keep her stumbling along incompetently to ensure the Tories are ousted in the next GE. A lot of harm will have been done by then, mind, whoever leads the pack.
If Theresa May goes, there’s no guarantee the DUP will want to keep propping up the Tories. Anyone coming in might not want to honour any deal.
” … stumbling along incompetently … ” – she’s been doing this on behalf of the country for far too many years. In case you hadn’t noticed (5 UN reports of disability treaty violations) this government is consciously murdering vulnerable disabled people.
Whilst the government sends arms and expertise to kill Sudanese cholera-infected children, brides, wedding guests and other civilians, do you suggest we suffer a few more x thousand deaths to ensure a political advantage in the next election?
Who are you? a (s)tory shill, or what?
Please support my petition against the Bedroom Tax – ‘long overdue injustice! Thnx
https://you.38degrees.org.uk/petitions/stop-the-bedroom-tax-3
No personal attacks, please!
‘Apologies for any ad hominem, Mike – ‘ just getting a little personally emotive about mass murder.
Although, I’m sure the Sudanese victims might take their personal attacks, far more personally, don’t you think, Mike?
Sure – but you can make that point without attacking another person on This Site. It’s as I always say – play the ball, not the other person.
It can never be acceptable to the electorate that unacceptable behavior by very senior ministers is permitted to go unchecked. That would be appeasement and we know where that can lead. No! It’s time to wake up! The ‘distinctions’ between so-called ‘democracy’ and ‘dictatorship’ are being blurred before our eyes on a daily basis now despite the existence of hard evidence to prove that the ‘Prime-Minister’ has actively and covertly supported ‘breaches of the Ministerial Code’ by very senior ministers with ‘international standing’ under her direct control. In countering this unscrupulous and merciless behavior we need feel no mercy ourselves: we are dealing with a cancerous growth deeply embedded within our political system and if there is one last thing worth saving within that creaking, rotting structure it has to be that vestige of INTEGRITY! Everything else might have to go! Perhaps we should be working to Performance Targets too!