Organisations that have offered unreserved support for the murder of dozens of people – and the indiscriminate injury of thousands more – have taken a verbal pummelling from the general public.
Taking the brunt of the backlash has been the Board of Deputies of British Jews, whose hasty announcement claiming that Hamas held the responsibility for the Israeli Defence Force’s decision to gun down defenceless people – some of whom were more than 300m from the fence they claimed to be protecting – has rightly been targeted for vitriol.
This report is from Jewish News:
Hundreds of British Jews have signed an angry open letter criticising the Board of Deputies’ leadership for its one-sided reaction to the violence in Gaza, with Liberal Judaism even questioning the Board’s credibility.
Within six hours of it being posted online, more than 530 had signed the letter from British Jewish group Yachad, saying the Board had “deeply misrepresented” their views on the killing of scores of protesters.
Signatories including Labour’s National Executive Committee member Rhea Wolfson and Jewish Labour Movement vice-chair Sarah Sackman said: “The Jewish community has a wide variety of perspectives and opinions when it comes to Israel, and it is incumbent upon the Board to represent that.”
The letter then called on the Board “to immediately reassess the procedures used to issue this ill-conceived and un-nuanced statement and to put in place a plan that will ensure that future statements will truly represent the community”.
Likewise, Liberal Judaism said “we deeply regret that Israel has not shown the necessary restraint” and that “the Board’s credibility as the voice of British Jewry depends wholly on its willingness to listen to, hear from and reflect the values of all sections of the community”.
A Board of Deputies spokesperson responded to the letter, saying: “We treasure the diversity of views in our community and are mindful of it. We made our statement based on the facts we were hearing. While every death is a tragedy, we hope that the public admissions today from Hamas and Islamic Jihad that nearly every single one of those killed at the border has been from one of their movements will give critics of Israel, and indeed critics of the Board of Deputies, pause for thought. These revelations demonstrate the challenge that Israel faces in defending its civilian towns and communities close to the Gaza/Israel border, and why Israel needs to be given support and some benefit of the doubt at this time.”
Jewish groups including Jewdas joined a Downing Street rally against Israel’s actions on Tuesday night, while on Wednesday night others held a ‘Kaddish for Gaza’ in Parliament Square.
Here’s the announcement itself:
— Board of Deputies of British Jews (@BoardofDeputies) May 15, 2018
It said: “No state could allow its borders to be breached by those who openly wish harm to its civilians. Israel is defending its people from repeated violent attempts at mass invasion.
“The responsibility for the violence lies with Hamas, a terrorist organisation with the explicit stated aim of murdering Israeli civilians and the ultimate destruction of the State of Israel.
“Hamas is cynical in the use of its population – including children – to join known terrorists in violent attempts to break through the border and kill Israeli citizens.”
Here’s one Jew’s response:
Why not just say “how dare Palestinians in Gaza attack Israeli bullets with their faces and bodies”? The Board of Deputies purports to represent British Jews but it sure as hell doesn’t represent me here. https://t.co/581wVYLJT9
— David Schneider (@davidschneider) May 15, 2018
How about this, pointing out that an eight-month-old baby was killed with IDF tear gas?
— Revolution Breeze (@suejonessays) May 16, 2018
Even Andrew Neil, anchoring the BBC’s Daily Politics on Wednesday, had harsh words for Israeli government apologist Stephen Crabb:
This is what the Board of Deputies – and others – are defending.
So it is no wonder someone came up with the bright idea of presenting an alternative view:
— The Bored of Deputies of British Jews (@BoredJews) May 15, 2018
Elsewhere, the discussion has been marked by propaganda and hearsay. Consider:
And YES, the blockade is TOTALLY OK. We supply the, food, water, electricity – but want to block arms from being transfered into Gaza. Would you do it if you were in oue placem against terror organizaton such as #Hamas?!
— guy zachs (@zaxmarketing) May 16, 2018
We would not have created a situation in which an organisation such as Hamas could flourish because we would not imprison an entire race of people in what is effectively an open-air prison camp, simply because they don’t belong to the same race as us.
As for the supply of food, water and electricity: We would not deprive hospitals of power in order to harm patients, we would not ensure the water was of such poor quality and so rarely available that it wasn’t worth having, and we would not shoot farmers in order to prevent food production by people within the ghetto – because we would not create that ghetto in the first place.
And what about this tweet from Tory Nick Boles, which provoked an angry response from Labour’s Chris Williamson:
I am absolutely disgusted, shocked and appalled by this tweet from a Tory MP who initially criticised the massacre of Palestinians by the Israeli Defence Force yesterday, but now says they had "an absolute right" to do so. pic.twitter.com/Fa72fIIh1a
— Chris Williamson (@DerbyChrisW) May 16, 2018
At least 14 of the deaths were International Journalists. At least 4 were small children.
— Timewalk Project (@Timewalkproject) May 16, 2018
Israelis say they grow up to be terrorists.
— Andy McDee #FreeJulianAssange (@mcdee_andy) May 16, 2018
Including the baby? What a load of fascist crap. It reminds me of the reasons that the Nazis used for exterminating entire villages because members of the resistance were suspected of being nearby.
— Geoff Rose – Former Labour Party member (@GeoffRose1946) May 16, 2018
And here we are, back with comparisons between the Israeli government and the Nazis – and the lobbyists who like to lob fake accusations of anti-Semitism cannot do anything about them, because they are accurate.
So the side of reason is winning the argument, right?
In that case…
Why is the Duke of Cambridge – Prince William – determined to continue with a planned visit to Israel that will amount to an endorsement of that country’s murder of innocent people?
This issue becomes more complicated by the second.
Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
(but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:
Here are four ways to be sure you’re among the first to know what’s going on.
1) Register with us by clicking on ‘Subscribe’ (in the left margin). You can then receive notifications of every new article that is posted here.
2) Follow VP on Twitter @VoxPolitical
3) Like the Facebook page at https://www.facebook.com/VoxPolitical/
Join the Vox Political Facebook page.
4) You could even make Vox Political your homepage at http://voxpoliticalonline.com
And do share with your family and friends – so they don’t miss out!
If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!
Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.
The Livingstone Presumption is now available
in either print or eBook format here:
Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:
The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here: