Labour’s ‘institutional’ problem isn’t racism – it’s right-wing, authoritarian MPs
This is deliberate needling by Chuka Umunna. He’s trying to provoke an aggressive reaction from among the membership of the Labour Party – as he was with his dehumanising tactic of calling us all “dogs”.
Well, every dog has its day, and ours is coming.
Here’s Mr Umunna’s latest outrageous claim:
Labour's @ChukaUmunna tells @RidgeOnSunday that the party is "institutionally racist" #Ridge pic.twitter.com/tinua9xhFI
— Politics Hub with Sophy Ridge (@SkyPoliticsHub) September 9, 2018
Notice that Sophy Ridge asked a leading question, allowing Mr Umunna to wax lyrical on this theme. He immediately goes off-course and crashes. He claims that the Labour Party has met the Macpherson report’s definition of “institutional racism” – but fails to elaborate on what it is.
Allow me to fill in the blanks. According to the report by Sir William Macpherson to the Stephen Lawrence inquiry, “institutional racism” is “the collective failure of an organisation to provide an appropriate and professional service to people because of their colour, culture or ethnic origin”. And it does not apply to the Labour Party at all.
Labour, as an organisation, has always provided an appropriate and professional service. Where party members have been found to have been exhibiting racist behaviour, it has not been in their capacity as members or officers of the party – it did not reflect Labour’s policies or procedures. And we know that the vast majority of accusations that have been levelled at Labour members have been false. Right?
Mr Umunna, a supporter of Labour Friends of Israel – an organisation that has now been proven to have been supporting the interests of the Israeli government in UK Parliamentary affairs (right?) – went on to say that Labour had failed to address “the racism known as anti-Semitism”. But Labour has been addressing it since 2016; it is the intervention of MPs like Mr Umunna (whose questioning of Ken Livingstone over anti-Semitism that year clearly showed he had already decided on the senior Labour member’s guilt) that induces the public wrongly to believe otherwise.
He demands that Labour should have adopted the IHRA definition of anti-Semitism, rather than its own code of conduct, failing to mention the fact that the IHRA document is vague, allows critics of the Israeli government to be falsely labelled anti-Semitic (because he’s involved with Labour Friends of Israel?), and was intended to be a tool to help investigations – not as evidence, or indeed proof, of claims against any party member his gang would like to accuse.
The dishonesty in his next comment is staggering. He claims that, if Labour had adopted the IHRA working definition, the party could have moved on to discuss the big political issues of the moment. This is not true. He knows – and we know (right?) that the accusations of anti-Semitism will not stop while Jeremy Corbyn is leader of the Labour Party. The Israeli government does not want a supporter of peace between its country and Palestine in line to be the next Prime Minister of a country as influential as the UK still remains, and that is why these claims continue. One was made the very morning after Labour adopted the IHRA definition, if I recall correctly.
His claim that there are still outstanding complaints is false, as you can see from this tweet by NEC member Claudia Webbe:
I’m Chair of Disputes for Labour’s NEC, I’ve spent the last series of weeks ensuring we are up to speed & ensuring all current Dispute Panel cases are dealt with, this is now complete. I am now working on revisions to our disciplinary procedures to better ensure fairness & speed
— Claudia Webbe MP (@ClaudiaWebbe) September 9, 2018
That being said, This Writer has been facing action under Labour’s disputes procedure since May 2017 and at the time of writing I am yet to be given details of the date and location of the first hearing at which I will be allowed to give evidence, which indicates that the process up to now has indeed left much to be desired – especially as I am utterly innocent of the charge against me, including all its particulars.
I am currently crowdfunding to carry out legal action against all my accusers and you should be able to find information on how you can help me, at the end of this article.
I cannot discuss the claim that Labour has not told MPs about threats of violence to them. I do know of a claim that a supporter of Joan Ryan MP threatened to kill a youth member who intervened when he tried to pressure a female vote-counter and then tried to assault the same young man on a second occasion. The Metropolitan Police has said it was ‘assessing’ the complaint.
Labour organisations, MPs and officers have made their opposition to Mr Umunna’s claims clear:
BAME Labour condemns the assertion that Labour is institutionally racist. Our party has a proud history fighting racism that continues today under @JeremyCorbyn and these remarks undermine our task of challenging the real rise in racism today.
— BAME Labour (@LabourBAME) September 9, 2018
For anyone to say @UKLabour is institutionally racist is just not right. I wouldn’t be a part of it otherwise. We’ve a rich & proud history in #Labour of constantly standing up against discrimination (even when others were/are trying to stoke hatred) & long may that continue.
— Tanmanjeet Singh Dhesi MP (@TanDhesi) September 9, 2018
I have literally spent all of life fighting racism. And today is a sad day @UKLabour is NOT institutionally racist. If it was I would go. @ChukaUmunna & Trevor Phillips interventions are disappointing. Windrush, hostile environment that's a clear example of a racist institution.
— Dawn Butler MP✊🏾💙 (@DawnButlerBrent) September 9, 2018
The mention of Trevor Phillips refers to a former chair of the Equalities and Human Rights Commission who has claimed that Labour “is led by anti-Semites and racists, who basically want to essentially eliminate anyone who disagrees with them” – in a staggering reversal of the facts. It is right-wingers like Mr Umunna (and, one must conclude, Mr Phillips) who want to eliminate anyone who disagrees with them. I make no comment about whether they are racist in any way.
Absolutely agree Dawn. https://t.co/GDYFhA7ekO
— Angela Rayner 🌹 (@AngelaRayner) September 9, 2018
The Labour Party, which I’ve been a proud member of for 40 yrs, is not institutionally racist. To suggest it is shows no understanding of either the work or the history of our party
— Jennie Formby (@Jennieformby1) September 9, 2018
Surely he should go through a disciplinary procedure. Labour is too soft on those on the right of the party.
— Andrew Walker 💚🥀 (@howdyandy) September 9, 2018
This is true. Many have questioned why Labour right-wingers seem able to come out with any old claptrap and go unpunished for it, while rank-and-file members such as myself can be suspended – and indeed expelled, as happened to Marc Wadsworth – on the basis of similar claptrap, sometimes uttered by other Labour MPs (Ruth Smeeth in the case of Mr Wadsworth).
Chuka Umunna says that @UKLabour is ‘institutionally racist’ and has likened party members to ‘dogs’. If the party Whip is not withdrawn from him now it will make a mockery of the disciplinary procedures used against ordinary members. https://t.co/fcP2B8cZDe
— Neil Clark (@NeilClark66) September 9, 2018
So, what can we say about this? Let’s start with Clive Lewis’s excellent comments to BBC News:
I wouldn’t bother with #Marr personally. Just watch this from @labourlewis as it is probably the best thing you’ll see today. Clive actually gets it. https://t.co/NKXJMkCUwt
— Rachael Swindon (@Rachael_Swindon) September 9, 2018
He makes a strong point: Labour members have exercised their democratic right to express their dissatisfaction with the behaviour of the right-wing MPs (like Joan Ryan, in the case under discussion) and to demand better.
Incredible how many so-called moderates are jumping to the defence of an MP with a history of disgraceful conduct, casually defending someone who made malicious complaints about a party member's 'antisemitism' which was found to be UNTRUE. That tells us all we need to know.
— Revolution Breeze (@SueJonesSays) September 9, 2018
The current Labour leadership understands that this is democracy – but the MPs under the spotlight – including Mr Umunna – don’t. The reason for this is explored very thoroughly in a Twitter thread by Ben Goren:
2/ It reveals a view of party politics that is naturally top down, paternalistic, and ultimately antithetical to democracy. This should not be a surprise since this is the quintessential characterisation of how the party operated as NuLabor™.
— Ben Goren (@BanGaoRen) September 9, 2018
4/ Those who dissented from 'on message' were derided, ignored, sidelined, and ostracised. Those who 'paid tribute' to the 'Emperor' were rewarded with front bench positions. The party ditched democracy for internal feudalism for the expediency of getting into power.
— Ben Goren (@BanGaoRen) September 9, 2018
6/ Conversely, the idea that grass roots members, CLPs, or conference should have or exercise power to challenge the authority of the leadership or these parachute MPs was regarded by them as at best arcane, at worst an insult. Democracy was 'mob rule' & should be limited.
— Ben Goren (@BanGaoRen) September 9, 2018
8/ As a result the membership imploded and, over time, so did the voter base. As it became clear the party had lost touch with both its socialist roots and had essentially eviscerated internal democracy, public engagement and participation with it dissolved. This was ignored.
— Ben Goren (@BanGaoRen) September 9, 2018
10/ They regard Corbyn's approach as a form of weakness. For them the leader doesn't listen to the party, he LEADS the party. Like children, they are comfortable with a strong paternal figure setting out the boundaries of behaviour. Without firm boundaries enforced: chaos.
— Ben Goren (@BanGaoRen) September 9, 2018
12/ "What if the King starts listening to the peons who love him & not his Court?" Also incomprehensible is the idea that the base might come to a unified informed conclusion against a Court that knows what's best for them. It must be the work of HQ. Hence, 'call off the dogs'.
— Ben Goren (@BanGaoRen) September 9, 2018
14/ Many are naturally terrified by the move to radically improve internal party democracy, more power and influence to the public, less for the Court. If @UKLabour introduces open selection or mandatory re-selection, there may be 150 'primary' challengers for their seats.
— Ben Goren (@BanGaoRen) September 9, 2018
16/ Jeremy Corbyn does not need to, and indeed cannot, 'call off the dogs'. He never set them on their quarry in the first place. Like a bleeding fish thrashing in the water, sharks are attracted to dying prey. The courtiers are so used to thinking of the members as passive …
— Ben Goren (@BanGaoRen) September 9, 2018
18/ As for the courtiers, after baying for Corbyn's blood, carrying out one failed coup after another, smearing him and the membership incessantly, briefing against the party to the press, they should expect no sympathy and Corbyn should do nothing to save them at the reckoning.
— Ben Goren (@BanGaoRen) September 9, 2018
So these people – Mr Umunna, Ms Ryan, Mr Phillips, Ms Smeeth, and the others not mentioned above – believe that Labour should be ruled from the centre, with the wider membership only allowed to service the needs of the privileged few in the PLP, NEC and other positions of power. That is why they believe Jeremy Corbyn can “call off the dogs”, as Mr Umunna unappealingly (indeed, unacceptably) described it.
But Mr Corbyn cannot. He did not set these “dogs” loose. And the right-wingers only have themselves to blame for their current predicament.
Indeed, their accusations may be considered victim-blaming of the lowest kind. Consider:
https://twitter.com/graham_budden/status/1038462848899395584
I don't remember Chuka Umunna calling for the attack dogs to be called off when the right-wing dominated NEC disciplinary people were instantly expelling thousands of ordinary Labour members for "crimes" like once retweeting Caroline Lucas or liking the Foo Fighters too much 🤔
— Another Angry Voice (@Angry_Voice) September 8, 2018
What next? Well…
Chuka Umunna can disagree with Labour’s direction if he wants. But party members are not dogs. The constant dehumanising narrative used against hundreds of thousands of decent Labour members – who just want a better world – as a thuggish rabble has to stop.
— Owen Jones (@OwenJones84) September 8, 2018
Yes it does. But we cannot descend to their level because we know that they have an advantage – a set of privileges – that the rest of us do not: They can say what they want with impunity but if we put one word out of line, they’ll use it as a stick and beat us with it. Like dogs.
https://twitter.com/ToryFibs/status/1038445403841220608
Cry-bully tactics:
When they call us "dog", "cultist", or the other slurs they use, they're just trying to get a rise out of us so that someone replies with insults
Then they can cherry-pick that insult and pretend it's representative of everyone on the left
Don't fall for it
— Another Angry Voice (@Angry_Voice) September 8, 2018
This is a debate that requires the ultimate in restraint from those of us who are in the right. We must be polite. We must be accurate. We must be forensic.
And when the other side changes its tactics, we must adapt. For instance:
Amazing eh?
A couple of CLP “no confidence” votes against Tory enabling #Labour MPs who’ve constantly attacked Corbyn & there's suddenly appeals for “unity” from other enabler’s who have yet to face their own constituency “no confidence” votes! https://t.co/rTlienDwS4— John Clarke (@JohnClarke1960) September 8, 2018
Back in 2016, during the so-called “Chicken Coup” that led to the second leadership election that Jeremy Corbyn won, Ms Eagle accused supporters of the Labour leader of vandalising the window of her constituency office. This was a lie. The broken window led to a staircase and not the office, and a police investigation showed no evidence that supporters of Mr Corbyn were responsible.
Now she is adopting a conciliatory tone. But note that she is trying to take the lead. We can unite to take on the Tories – if we follow her lead and that of her group within the Labour Party.
No, thank you, Angela. You had your chance and you attacked us.
You know what sickens me most about Labour's hard right… People are literally dying under this govt. But they spend ALL their time attacking Corbyn. Then when we say we have had enough, they throw their hands in the air and say, can we all get on with fighting the Tories!
— Chelley Ryan #EnoughIsEnough (@chelleryn99) September 8, 2018
If you hear someone attacking Jeremy Corbyn’s Labour leadership, using accusations of anti-Semitism against him and the membership at large, or claiming that the members are somehow traitors for using the party’s own mechanisms to stop them… these are the people to oppose.
Politely.
But firmly.
Visit our JustGiving page to help Vox Political’s Mike Sivier fight anti-Semitism libels in court
Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
(but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:
Here are four ways to be sure you’re among the first to know what’s going on.
1) Register with us by clicking on ‘Subscribe’ (in the left margin). You can then receive notifications of every new article that is posted here.
2) Follow VP on Twitter @VoxPolitical
3) Like the Facebook page at https://www.facebook.com/VoxPolitical/
Join the Vox Political Facebook page.
4) You could even make Vox Political your homepage at http://voxpoliticalonline.com
And do share with your family and friends – so they don’t miss out!
If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!
Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.
The Livingstone Presumption is now available
in either print or eBook format here:
Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:
The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:
Umunna is just an elitist who thinks we should all just do as people like him tell us.
Proscribe Progress. It’s the only way, top down, to deal with them. (Ironically too.)
Truly, the lion has stirred from his slumbers!
Something does need to be done about the Blairite right-wing MPs. They seem immune to disciplinary action.
Members will never forget the disgraceful actions of the chicken coup and the NEC under Mcnicol – democracy left the party completely in 2016. I saw and heard loyal Labour members – people who had been members for longer than Umunna has lived on this earth – reduced to tears by the actions of the party and these MPs. It was a complete and utter disgrace and will not be forgotten – the underhand and downright disgusting ways they employed, in order to harass and interrogate ordinary, decent folk. Trawling through their social media in order to find anything they could to sling at them, so that they could then disqualify their votes. These people were meant to be ‘on the same side’ as us!
These MPs, together with the right-wing rags they often run to with their op-eds against the party, are STILL managing to subject Corbyn to such abusive and bullying behaviour – yet again trawling through his social media for years back, to try to find any juicy tidbit they can throw back at him. They call us dogs, or trots, stalinists and communists. Or else they call us ‘Corbynistas’ or ‘cult’. Every single one a term of abuse, chucked at us by so-called Labour MPs.
And yet still we are leading in the polls. Certainly our lead would be in double figures if they actually toed the party line, and fought with us against the tories, but it shows how desperately people want to get this government out, that they refuse to cower to the right wing rags and believe all the crap.
They have gotten away with bullying, harassing and verbally assaulting grassroots members for far too long. Something needs to be done to discipline them, from within the party. I am so heartened to see CLPs finally taking the onus on themselves, and saying to their MPs (as Clive Smith so eloquently put it) that ‘enough is enough. Get behind the leader, and behind the party, and behind the members, and start fighting the tories’. Something we always advocated they do when they were so busy slurring and smearing the leader for years.
Let them try to form another party, and I eagerly await seeing how far it gets them. We’ve had enough of them spilling their vitriol all over us, the members, just so that they can continue to lap up the spoils on the gravy train. That’s why none of these spineless right-wingers will actually resign – because they don’t want to lose the salary, and the perks, the expenses claims, the jollies, everything which comes with being a Labour MP.
Very well said Vanda.
If Chukka is so concerned about racism, why isn’t he leading a campaign against the Tories in favour of the Windrush victims that have been so vilely treated.
The answer of course is obvious, he isn’t concerned about racism at all.
We really do need to take action against these right wing MPs that are deliberately bringing the party into disrepute, and will not stop until they achieve their real agenda.