McDonnell says Labour would scrap Universal Credit – and it won’t be a moment too soon
Bravo to John McDonnell for coming out and saying that a Labour government would kill Universal Credit before it could kill any more people than it already has.
The idea of combining the six main state benefits into a single payment may have looked good in theory, but in practice it has been a long, expensive disaster.
The plan to make it entirely computerised had to be shelved after a series of technical problems that pushed the budget through the roof. In the end, the rollout was only achieved by reverting to calculations using pen and paper.
Initial payments were delayed by six weeks for no reason, forcing claimants into starvation and rent arrears. Sensing a scandal, the Tories reluctantly agreed to bring payments forward – by just one week.
And then the Tories cut the budget, making it practically impossible for anybody receiving the benefit to make ends meet.
As it stands, Universal Credit is a deathtrap and Labour is right to call for its end.
The Conservatives have responded by saying that Labour does not have a viable replacement. But they are missing the point, which is this:
Any benefit system that a Labour Party led by Jeremy Corbyn and John McDonnell would install will be better than Universal Credit – because it will not be intended to push claimants off a benefit that is starving them into work that is so poorly-paid they may well be worse-off.
The government’s flagship welfare policy faces being scrapped by Labour because it is “just not sustainable”, the shadow chancellor has said.
John McDonnell said universal credit, which merges six working-age benefits into one payment, “will have to go”.
“I think we’re at that stage now that it’s not sustainable any more. It’s not a system that can work.
“It’s not a system that’s providing the safety net that people expect when they need support.
“I think we are moving to a position now where it is just not sustainable.
“It will have to go.
“I think we are moving towards a conclusion now that you can’t save the thing, it’s got to go.”
Source: Universal credit has to go, says John McDonnell – BBC News
Visit our JustGiving page to help Vox Political’s Mike Sivier fight anti-Semitism libels in court
Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
(but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:
Here are four ways to be sure you’re among the first to know what’s going on.
1) Register with us by clicking on ‘Subscribe’ (in the left margin). You can then receive notifications of every new article that is posted here.
2) Follow VP on Twitter @VoxPolitical
3) Like the Facebook page at https://www.facebook.com/VoxPolitical/
Join the Vox Political Facebook page.
4) You could even make Vox Political your homepage at http://voxpoliticalonline.com
And do share with your family and friends – so they don’t miss out!
If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!
Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.
The Livingstone Presumption is now available
in either print or eBook format here:
Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:
The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:
now we talking uc is a stick to beat the peasants with nothing more
That will be a potential vote winner however some visibility on Labours replacement ideas would be helpful. Having a fair and just system would be a vast improvement on the current crock of Nazi style contracted out assessments.
It would be an improvement just to revert to the “legacy benefits” while something else is being figured out. Especially if sanctions were taken out of the equasion.
Longer term, I think a meaningful reform would have to involve abolishing the DWP in its current form with a serious effort made to prevent the current employees simply transferring to its replacement.
Agreed.