Esther McVey says she has been falsely connected with a campaigning company. Why is she trying to shoot the messenger?
We always knew the Work and Pensions secretary, Esther McVey, was a bully – this proves it graphically.
Alex Tiffin is an independent journalist who runs the Universal Credit Sufferer blog.
On the morning of November 3, he tweeted an extraordinary announcement about Ms McVey, following research at Companies House.
The Company Director is Williams Throw who owns this account; @ThowWilliam.
The Company lists itself as an IT Consultancy despite being a political lobbying and campaign group.
It's a registered Ltd company and most recent accounts show a share valuation of £20 million.
— Alex Tiffin (@RespectIsVital) November 3, 2018
WATCH @evolvepolitics today for the full details dropping.
— Alex Tiffin (@RespectIsVital) November 3, 2018
UPDATE
Esther McVey has denied knowledge of this adding she has contacted Companies House to rectify.
It is important to note, that McVey as the named Company Secretary will been receiving HMRC correspondence related to this company since March 2018. So she's also missed it
— Alex Tiffin (@RespectIsVital) November 3, 2018
As well as failing to declare her links to shady political fundraising organisation Loyal Scots, Esther McVey may also have broken the law by failing to file legally required documents for the company, of which she is Secretary. She could be prosecuted for this. pic.twitter.com/cgAlJVesQw
— The Prole Star (@TheProleStar) November 3, 2018
So Ms McVey is named at Companies House as the secretary of Loyal Scots Company Ltd, a political campaign funding group worth £20 million. She has not notified the House of Commons of this financial interest. As secretary, she should be receiving correspondence to the company from HM Revenue and Customs, and may have broken the law by failing to file legally-required documents.
Note that Mr Tiffin did not write the story – it was written up by Tom D. Rogers and published on Evolve Politics rather than Universal Credit Sufferer.
Ms McVey, however, seems to have taken against him:
The pits in journalism -not checking the facts
I have no knowledge or connection to this company but they appear to have used my name. I have now contacted Companies House.
Alex Tiffin@evolvepolitics
issued me an email at 8.46am to respond by 6pm Mon but hasn’t abided by this https://t.co/bIhfeU2OQm— Esther McVey (@EstherMcVey1) November 3, 2018
The problem is: Mr Tiffin very obviously did check the facts. And he didn’t write the story that caused her to complain, so she can’t use the deadline on his email against him.
While it seems she has got the message and – if the information at Companies House really is false – is taking steps to rectify the matter, why is she trying to shoot the messenger?
Mr Tiffin made many of these points in his response to Ms McVey:
I originally tweeted this at 3.41am, PRIOR to my email to you. I was going to write an article on Monday.
In the end I didn't even write the article, check the byline.
It was in the public interest so a decision was taken by the editors to publish today
Factually it's correct https://t.co/1Thxqt14bK
— Alex Tiffin (@RespectIsVital) November 3, 2018
He added, later:
McVey has denied knowledge of this. That's fine.
What she won't answer is,
; how she & her staff missed the multiple letters HMRC will have been sending to her constituency office since March.Most people don't ignore HMRC. Seems poor administration at best… https://t.co/Ct5urbDHs5
— Alex Tiffin (@RespectIsVital) November 4, 2018
The question about the correspondence sent to Tatton Conservative Club is pertinent. It is inconceivable that an organisation like the Conservative Party would not forward mail to one of its MPs, so one questions what happened to it.
What happened next is deeply sinister.
It seems social media users who support Ms McVey dogpiled Mr Tiffin – verbally responded to his tweets on this subject with abuse in an attempt to intimidate him:
As expected, the Tory trolls are coming after me hard regarding me uncovering Esther McVey's dodgy company links.
Funny when it's all publicly available information that can be verified.
Glorious.
— Alex Tiffin (@RespectIsVital) November 3, 2018
Why would they do that? If he really has uncovered a case of identity theft, then he has done her a favour by exposing it.
If there was nothing in it, then Ms McVey’s behaviour is unaccountable. She is behaving like a woman with something to hide. Why else would anybody attack a person who has revealed the fraudulent use of their name?
Here are four ways to be sure you’re among the first to know what’s going on.
1) Register with us by clicking on ‘Subscribe’ (in the left margin). You can then receive notifications of every new article that is posted here.
2) Follow VP on Twitter @VoxPolitical
3) Like the Facebook page at https://www.facebook.com/VoxPolitical/
Join the Vox Political Facebook page.
4) You could even make Vox Political your homepage at http://voxpoliticalonline.com
And do share with your family and friends – so they don’t miss out!
If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!
Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.
The Livingstone Presumption is now available
in either print or eBook format here:
Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:
The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:
oh dear another at it it seems but this government are trading each day under the fraud banner were they uncharge of a company they would be done for fraud yet being mps ministers they get away with it ouch
Why does it say Denmark when as we all should know wilmslow is in Cheshire?
That’s a very good question. All correspondence would have gone to the right address because of the street number and postcode, so it doesn’t matter in real terms – but it’s certainly a curiosity.
both@ScotsCompany and@ThowWilliam. have protected tweets? hmm fishy
Yet other Tory fraudster.
If she gets her name removed we should be looking very carefully at who the replacement is and if there is any relationship to her….