Did the BBC do a backroom deal with the Tories? (Why the BBC shouldn’t host the Brexit debate part 2)
The BBC thought the deal was all sewn up – but it seems the Corporation’s bosses jumped to the wrong conclusion, too soon.
Before you jump to conclusions too, dear reader, be advised that this is not about Theresa May’s Brexit agreement with the EU, but about her challenge to Jeremy Corbyn, to take part in a debate about the deal on television.
Around lunchtime yesterday, the BBC News press team announced that Mrs May had accepted the Corporation’s offer to host the debate, on December 9.
There was just one problem, as Jim Waterson explained:
https://twitter.com/jimwaterson/status/1068123711230935040
As The Canary reports: “Before becoming May’s director of communications in late 2017, Robbie Gibb was head of the BBC‘s Westminster programmes. Now, Gibb is reportedly insisting that the BBChosts the debate “at all costs”.
“Meanwhile, BBC news bulletins (and reporting from elsewhere in the corporate media, such as the Independent) are presenting May’s BBC debate as a challenge to Jeremy Corbyn. But in reality, the Labour leader said he would “relish” a TV debate with May late on 25 November, immediately after she suggested one.”
Here’s the thing:
https://twitter.com/James4Labour/status/1068129130133291013
That’s right. Theresa May issued the challenge, meaning Mr Corbyn should have the right to choose the terms.
And he doesn’t want to debate Mrs May on the BBC.
Can anybody blame him?
Here’s The Canary again: “The difference is that Labour prefers what ITV has tabled: a straight head-to-head debate between the two leaders. And it’s pretty obvious why. Because the BBC‘s format seems to allow for BBC editors to rig the discussion against Corbyn. They will have significant power over the questions and participants involved in the debate”
Not only that: Already we have learned that the BBC apparently hired an actress who runs her own tiny internet church to speak in favour of Mrs May on Newsnight debates. Social media commentators have already linked this behaviour with the debate challenge:
"BBC or ITV?" said the Actress to the Bishop in the mirror.#VicarGate
— TracieWaylingArtASMR (@traciewayling) November 29, 2018
Now it seems the BBC has been discussing the challenge that Mrs May sprang on Mr Corbyn – not-so-spontaneously, it seems – for many weeks.
Why else would the Tories plan TV appearances hosted by the BBC’s David Dimbleby, including a “Question Time style session” and brief the Conservative-supporting Daily Telegraph about it on Monday (November 26)?
Looks like Number 10 were in bilateral discussions with the BBC for weeks. Their leaked grid on the 6th November mentions an interview with Dimbleby, and they briefed into Monday’s Telegraph they’d have a “Question Time style session” if Corbyn refused a debate pic.twitter.com/veA3wAUxc4
— Matt Zarb-Cousin (@mattzarb) November 29, 2018
Commentators are already concluding that the BBC is colluding with the Conservative Party – so much for the Corporation’s claims of impartiality! – to build support for her Brexit deal and run Labour down:
The terminally awful @bbcnews colluding with Tories over the #brexitdebate to make Labour look bad is the last straw for me. Doubt I'll ever trust the BBC again and I'll make sure everyone I know knows it too.
— Tweets by Sue (@marthasydenham) November 29, 2018
Some have resorted to satire:
https://twitter.com/JackDunc1/status/1068172386732843008
While others have aimed sharper barbs:
When May’s deal gets voted down, her media lackeys are going to pin the blame for an impending no deal entirely on Corbyn.
This will only work if the public forgets that Tory disunity has literally created this entire situation.
We must not let the Tories’ false narrative win.
— Evolve Politics (@evolvepolitics) November 29, 2018
Personally, I like this comment, which bypasses the silliness of the BBC and ITV jostling for position and goes straight to the heart of the matter:
Why have a debate on television, which is presumably an attempt to sway people’s opinion one way or the other, only then not to allow the people to decide what the outcome should be? Makes no sense. 🤷🏻♂️
— Gary Lineker (@GaryLineker) November 29, 2018
He’s right.
But then, we’re discussing Brexit – a situation in which the elected leaders of the United Kingdom have vowed to follow the wish of a majority of voters in a referendum, even though they know there is no possible outcome in which the country will be better-off as a result of it.
No part of Brexit makes any sense at all. Why should this be any different?
Visit our JustGiving page to help Vox Political’s Mike Sivier fight anti-Semitism libels in court
Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
(but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:
Here are four ways to be sure you’re among the first to know what’s going on.
1) Register with us by clicking on ‘Subscribe’ (in the left margin). You can then receive notifications of every new article that is posted here.
2) Follow VP on Twitter @VoxPolitical
3) Like the Facebook page at https://www.facebook.com/VoxPolitical/
Join the Vox Political Facebook page.
4) You could even make Vox Political your homepage at http://voxpoliticalonline.com
And do share with your family and friends – so they don’t miss out!
If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!
Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.
The Livingstone Presumption is now available
in either print or eBook format here:
Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:
The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:
This debate should not be allowed anywhere near the biased BBC.
I hope Jeremy Corbyn has the sense not to go anywhere near the BBC “debate”. If it’s anything like the dreadful Question Time programme he will be a lonely voice in a studio with a hand-picked Tory chair, hand-picked Tory panel and a hand-picked Tory audience.
Instead of wasting money on QT the BBC could simply show the Monty Python “argument” sketch on a loop, it comes to much the same thing…
Well, are they prepared to allow Nicola Sturgeon into the debate, then this would help the balance. unfortunately they won’t because Nicola is more than a match for both of them.
Panto for the masses. How about a TV debate on Austerity, Welfare reform, poverty, foodbanks? How can I even care about Brexit when life is reduced to basic survival?
The bbc will have an audience of tory plants.After all isn’t it just one big party political broadcast on their behalf?Question time,Andrew Marr and his bosom buddy Andrew neil are proof of their bias.
I have heard comments that this ‘brexit’ thing was arranged so as to get rid of the welfare state and sell of the NHS. Obviously the Americans are in there somewhere as the Tory ‘believers’ have been colluding since Thatchers day toward that end. Sorry to go off topic.
Seen enough previous victims fall for this BBC scam and their bias goes into their choice of audience and anticipated reactions as well. Truly broken media outlet that should be far more balanced than it currently is. Not a good global advert for british fairplay more an advert for globalist ownership by the Elite.
This debate should take place on channel 4. Then and only then would we get anything like an impartial debate. I wouldn’t trust the BBC to hang washing on the line!!
Why would Corbyn do a debate on BBC a ”Tory propaganda Chanel” – he’s got more sense