Tories panic as MPs are to debate their contempt of Parliament TODAY
Never mind anything else you’ve heard about the government’s legal advice on its Brexit deal; this is the real reason the Tories are facing contempt of Parliament proceedings:
Geoffrey Cox's voice continues to be preposterous
— Ian Dunt (@IanDunt) December 3, 2018
You know it’s true.
And the things that voice said when he appeared in the Commons to justify refusing to provide the full legal advice present a summary of the legal advice to MPs were preposterous too.
Without wishing to be discourteous – it's like a *car crash* audition for
Rumpole of the Bailey. https://t.co/FmPsUa7Xsp— Clare Hepworth OBE (@Hepworthclare) December 3, 2018
Nobody was convinced by his performance (apart from, perhaps, Kenneth Clarke. Perhaps he had been smoking one fat cigar too many, or listening to one jazz piece too loud, before entering the Commons chamber). Here’s the issue:
Nobody should confuse a very long statement from Cox, with Parliament getting what it unanimously agreed to on a binding motion, namely, the full and final legal advice from the Attorney General to the Cabinet.
— Labour Whips (@labourwhips) December 3, 2018
If the Government did not want to publish the full and final legal advice they should have whipped their MPs to vote against the binding motion. They didn’t because they knew they would lose. Time to publish.
— Labour Whips (@labourwhips) December 3, 2018
The problem for the Tory government was that, when the Humble Address motion was made on November 13, there was no way it could have won a vote, and losing would have been taken as a sign that Parliament had lost confidence in the Conservatives’ ability to rule. The choice to accept the motion was the lesser of the evils on offer.
But then the government tried to back out of the commitment it had accepted – to provide, in full, the legal advice that supported Theresa May’s Brexit deal. This simple act indicates that there is something to hide, no matter what Mr Cox may say:
https://twitter.com/James4Labour/status/1069643160857600002
But, if the legal advice is bad, they have duty to reveal it. We're talking about the future of 65 million men, women and children. That's a lot of lives at risk. This is not an Eton game. This is f***ing serious. https://t.co/2LaoTaPjqn
— Marcus Chown (@marcuschown) December 3, 2018
It is the suggestion that the Tories are hiding the facts that has led Commons Speaker John Bercow to schedule a debate on contempt of Parliament proceedings, to happen today – December 4 – before the start of a five-day debate on the Brexit deal.
He did this after representatives of every Opposition party in the Commons, including the DUP, wrote to him demanding that the government be held in contempt:
https://twitter.com/ToryFibs/status/1069654974186033153
NEW: Labour, SNP, Lib Dems, DUP, Plaid and Greens writing joint letter to Speaker calling for contempt of Parliament proceedings over Brexit legal advice pic.twitter.com/B0vpuQGKDP
— Nick Eardley (@nickeardleybbc) December 3, 2018
Despite Cox’s theatrical efforts, opposition parties – including government’s alleged partner Northern Ireland’s DUP – ask Speaker to allow motion which would see government ruled in contempt for failing to publish FULL legal advice on @theresa_may’s Brexit plan pic.twitter.com/jQc9hoFFup
— Robert Peston (@Peston) December 3, 2018
Some have suggested that the DUP may have an ulterior motive for taking part in this:
If Labour table a "no confidence" vote in Theresa May's Tory govt, it'll be All-Their-Christmasses-At-Once time for the DUP. They'll be able to demand whatever they want. Gold plated bathrooms. Holidays in the Caribbean. Dinosaur-free natural history museums. All with YOUR money.
— Marcus Chown (@marcuschown) December 3, 2018
But it is possible for that party to profit either way, as a future government – of any colour – may still have to rely on DUP votes to get its Brexit plans passed.
The result? As stated: A debate on a motion to find ministers in contempt of Parliament due to their failure to comply with the Humble Address passed on November 13.
No penalty is spelt out in the motion because it is intended to act as a final warning – but Labour spokespeople have said that if it is passed and the government still fails to comply with the Humble Address then the party would seek further sanctions.
These may include the suspension of Mr Cox.
But it is also likely that David Lidington, Mrs May’s de facto lieutenant, may also be held in contempt and suspended from the Commons.
And how have the Tories responded?
They’ve responded with abject panic, at first flooding the Commons chamber late into Monday evening to filibuster a debate on Scotland’s foreign policy footprint, in order to give their party’s whips time to submit their own amendment to the contempt motion.
But that amendment turned out to be a limp attempt to kick the matter down the road – referring it to the Commons privileges committee. This is unlikely to win the support of Opposition MPs and the DUP, all of whom have scented metaphorical blood.
One MP who appears to have made up his mind already is Shadow Chancellor John McDonnell. Read his words, watch the video clip of Shadow Solicitor-General Nick Thomas-Symonds, and ask yourself whether you think you deserve better from the government – considering the enormity of what’s at stake here.
The contempt the Tories have shown Parliament and the people of this country demonstrates that they are not fit for the office they hold. https://t.co/PJgsEE8x5s
— John McDonnell MP (@johnmcdonnellMP) December 3, 2018
I certainly do.
The duppies might have woken up to the fact that getting bed with tory is a bad move, however they backed a lot of tory policies, something that won’t be forgotten when they get out of there beds asking for votes, they must have been having a bad dream when they invited boris the clown to there conference, he could have sold them a boiler!!!
Yeah have been watching it live on BBC Parliament . . lots of wiffle waffle going on.. Kenneth Clarke . . . zzzzz