Lying DWP facing court action over failure to improve safeguarding after claimant deaths
The one organisation in the UK that regularly gets away with forcing innocent people to their deaths may soon have to account for its behaviour in Parliament – and in a court of law.
Sadly the Parliamentary action is unlikely to make any difference at all; MPs have called for accountability far too many times and all Department for Work and Pensions does is utter meaningless promises to improve its procedures. Then it ignores those promises in order to continue persecuting vulnerable benefit claimants.
The current pressure from the Commons Work and Pensions committee follows last week’s adjournment debate on the deaths of claimants including Errol Graham, who starved to death after the DWP cut of his benefits for no good reason.
Committee chairman Stephen Timms has announced that he will question ministers on their department’s refusal to protect people like Mr Graham and the thousands of others who have died as a result of the cruelty imposed on them by the DWP, on the orders of the Tory government.
He said despite scores of internal inquiries into claimant deaths – many of them as a result of suicide – officials were unable to show that they had done anything at all to improve the safeguarding of vulnerable claimants.
“The idea that people are taking their own life as a result of DWP actions is so awful,” Timms said. “It is unacceptable for the DWP to keep obfuscating. It cannot avoid the subject any longer. This is clearly something serious and it needs to engage and resolve it.”
Mr Timms mentioned the National Audit Office (NAO) report showing that, despite reviewing at least 69 suicides that could have been linked to benefit denials over the last six years, the DWP had not acted on any of the recommendations of those reviews.
The figures in the report did not include cases like that of Mr Graham, in which suicide was not the formal cause of death.
Sadly, the Commons committee is all-too-likely to be fobbed off with the usual protestations from DWP ministers – that they are doing something. They – and/or their forerunners – have made such claims before and got away with it.
We may hope that Mr Graham’s family have more luck with their court action against the Department.
They are claiming that the DWP acted against the law by failing to take all reasonable steps to check on the health of a claimant they knew to be highly vulnerable before removing his only source of income.
Family members are also arguing that secretive investigations and reviews being conducted by the DWP into benefit-related deaths are unlawful and must be reformed.
There is also the question of a promise made by a DWP representative at Mr Graham’s inquest, in order to prevent the coroner from writing a ‘Prevention of Future Deaths’ report, which would have required the DWP to formally explain what steps it was taking to improve its safeguarding policy.
The DWP’s chief psychologist, David Carew, told coroner Elizabeth Didcock that a safeguarding review would report in the autumn of 2019. He said it would urgently consider measures to protect highly vulnerable claimants at risk of having their benefits cut off, including changing safeguarding guidance to staff.
But no such report has been made. There was no review team, no formal commission to publish a review, and staff have received no changes to their guidance.
In short, it seems Mr Carew misled Her Majesty’s Coroner; he lied.
We may hope that a judge will give appropriate weight to all this information.
There are calls for an independent inquiry, with some MPs suggesting that this may restore confidence in the DWP.
This Writer disagrees. As the Labour Party stated in its election manifesto last year, there is no way to restore confidence in a government department that has deceived MPs, the courts and the public in order to ensure a steady stream of benefit-related deaths.
Have YOU donated to my crowdfunding appeal, raising funds to fight false libel claims by TV celebrities who should know better? These court cases cost a lot of money so every penny will help ensure that wealth doesn’t beat justice.
Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
(but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:
Here are four ways to be sure you’re among the first to know what’s going on.
1) Register with us by clicking on ‘Subscribe’ (in the left margin). You can then receive notifications of every new article that is posted here.
2) Follow VP on Twitter @VoxPolitical
3) Like the Facebook page at https://www.facebook.com/VoxPolitical/
Join the Vox Political Facebook page.
4) You could even make Vox Political your homepage at http://voxpoliticalonline.com
And do share with your family and friends – so they don’t miss out!
If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!
Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.
The Livingstone Presumption is now available
in either print or eBook format here:
Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:
The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:
Dr David Carew has ‘form.’ Back in 2013 he was investigated for using some dodgy psychometric tests that were unfit for purpose:
‘The Guardian has learned that the Health and Care Professions Council (HCPC), the regulator for psychologists, dietitians and other health workers, is investigating a complaint against the chief psychologist at the DWP, Dr David Carew, for allegedly permitting the psychometric tests to be trialled in jobcentres.
The credibility of the 48-question character test has already came under fire from US-based psychologists who said they had refused the UK government permission to use it as it had failed to be properly validated.’
So this character is still hanging around for his paycheck then?
The DWP is a shambles, unfit for purpose and should be shut down, all those culpable going right back to IDS should be investigated and prosecuted, including those in charge who also carry some responsibility; David Cameron, George Osborne, Lord Freud, Iain Duncan Smith, Theresa May, Esther McVey, Amber Rudd, Therese Coffey, Boris Johnson, and probably several others, all deserve to be thrown in jail.
Yet since 2010 the MPs have been told dayly about dwp and the contractors working for them talks in the side rooms of the house of I’ll repute have talked about dwp ESA DLA pip benefits but nothing prevails it seems aktion T4 rolling along with out much of a ado culling the stock through benefits denial carries on regardless