Starmer lied over Corbyn, the EHRC and anti-Semitism. Shouldn’t he quit as Labour leader now?
Alex Nunns used to be Jeremy Corbyn’s speech writer, so it is true that he has a stake in this debate.
But his analysis of Keir Starmer’s role in the decision to suspend Corbyn’s Labour Party membership – a much larger role than the current Labour leader wanted to admit and one that puts him in breach of EHRC recommendations he promised to uphold – is carried out in such a way as to foil all critics.
Keir Starmer took the decision to suspend Jeremy Corbyn. Labour claimed the General Secretary did in a flawed attempt to evade the charge of political interference—the very thing the EHRC condemned. But Keir couldn't resist boasting about his "difficult decision" on the radio. pic.twitter.com/fhkHr40p1u
— Alex Nunns (@alexnunns) November 1, 2020
At first he said general secretary David Evans took the action, but then added “I’m not going to shy away from difficult decisions”, and “we made a very difficult decision”. He shouldn’t have been anywhere near it but clearly he was.
Worse follows:
For example, when Jeremy Corbyn's LOTO was consulted on Ken Livingstone—in order to suspend him (a detail which rather ruins the usual narrative)—that was political interference, according to the EHRC. Remember, Labour has briefed that Starmer was consulted on Corbyn. pic.twitter.com/0amATKX6Pi
— Alex Nunns (@alexnunns) November 1, 2020
The above is self-explanatory. On the day he said he would honour the recommendations of the EHRC report, Starmer contradicted one – and a major one at that.
In its first press statement, Labour didn't say the General Secretary made the decision to suspend Corbyn, but later strongly briefed journalists that he did—perhaps suddenly aware it wasn't supposed to look like a political decision.
— Alex Nunns (@alexnunns) November 1, 2020
It was going to look like a political decision, no matter what. Notice of investigations – let alone suspensions – should only ever be issued after the Labour Party has received a complaint about a party member. Who complained about Corbyn?
As far as anybody can tell, nobody did. And if it was made by the general secretary – whether in consultation with the party leader or not…
So, to convince people there was no political interference in the suspension of Jeremy Corbyn, Labour went out of its way to say it wasn't the Leader who did it, but the General Secretary—which, according to the EHRC, makes no difference. It's still political interference.
— Alex Nunns (@alexnunns) November 1, 2020
Then there’s the issue of whether the Governance and Legal Unit (GLU) – the party employees who investigate complaints against members – is subject to political interference itself.
There was considerable controversy when it was alleged that someone was appointed to the GLU in a political appointment by Jeremy Corbyn – but it seems Starmer has done the same:
Bringing this back to Corbyn, on an all-staff call on Friday—perhaps stung by NEC members having disputed that the General Secretary even has the power to suspend—staff were told he'd consulted Starmer's reported "enforcer." Just can't escape the charge of political interference.
— Alex Nunns (@alexnunns) November 1, 2020
Starmer has gone on to lie – on television – about the statement made by Jeremy Corbyn that led to his suspension:
Jeremy Corbyn didn't deny there's a problem with antisemitism in the Labour Party, didn't say it was "just" exaggerated, and didn't say it was "just" factional. He said "Anyone claiming there is no antisemitism in the Labour Party is wrong." Starmer knows that, of course.
— Alex Nunns (@alexnunns) November 1, 2020
So Starmer lied about Corbyn; he has been misrepresenting what Corbyn said in an attempt to make his words seem worse than they were.
Starmer also lied about the EHRC report; he either participated in or oversaw political interference when the report demanded an end to it, and he appears to have participated in unlawful indirect discrimination against Corbyn.
We already know that the current Labour leadership is lying about anti-Semitism; Angela Rayner’s words in an interview yesterday show that neither she, nor Starmer, nor Evans (it seems) have any interest in whether an allegation of anti-Semitism is accurate. They say if a statement causes “hurt” or “distress”, that is enough. It isn’t. Anybody can say a comment caused them distress and it won’t matter a fig. The only way to judge these allegations is against a set of clear definitions – such as the IHRA definition of anti-Semitism that Labour has adopted and that Corbyn did not break anywhere in his statement.
Otherwise, a high-profile suspension like Corbyn’s may lead to counter-allegations of libel by the Labour Party (as embodied in its general secretary, Evans).
These are big lies, for which Starmer has no defence.
He has deliberately tried to mislead party members and the general public.
In This Writer’s opinion, that makes him unfit to lead the Labour Party.
(If I’m honest, it makes him unfit to be a member of the Labour Party).
He needs to go – now. And if he won’t go willingly, he should be removed. Let’s see a call for a Vote Of ‘No Confidence’ from the membership. Who’ll table it?
Have YOU donated to my crowdfunding appeal, raising funds to fight false libel claims by TV celebrities who should know better? These court cases cost a lot of money so every penny will help ensure that wealth doesn’t beat justice.
Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
(but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:
Here are four ways to be sure you’re among the first to know what’s going on.
1) Register with us by clicking on ‘Subscribe’ (in the left margin). You can then receive notifications of every new article that is posted here.
2) Follow VP on Twitter @VoxPolitical
3) Like the Facebook page at https://www.facebook.com/VoxPolitical/
Join the Vox Political Facebook page.
4) You could even make Vox Political your homepage at http://voxpoliticalonline.com
And do share with your family and friends – so they don’t miss out!
If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!
Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.
The Livingstone Presumption is now available
in either print or eBook format here:
Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:
The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:
Stammer the spammer hay has set the issues of but not he did he not bugger I’m flabbergasted by his lies this man not fit to lock Corbyn s boot he’s just a lackie of the Tories
If Starmer has lied, he is duty-bound to resign as leader.
Don’t think the membership can launch an effective VoNC, i have submitted a motion on nc to my CLP but isn’t just the MPs who can remove Starmer
Again, on Andrew Marr, this person referred to the I.H.R.A. Working Definition as “the international definition.” UNTRUE! Why does nobody challenge these people? “International” refers to the name of the organisation, not the definition, or its standing! I am still in contact with Kenneth Stern.
Have you asked him what he thinks of the latest developments here, in relation to his document? I think his response could be very interesting.