‘Voting irregularities’ at the MP of the Year awards? What’s going on?
The MP of the Year Awards have apparently fallen into trouble yet again.
The award scheme, run by the Patchwork Foundation, has been under a shadow since Chris Williamson was disqualified last year – because his Labour Party membership had been suspended.
At the time, the organisation stated: “Our MP of the Year Awards seek to celebrate and recognise those MPs that uphold the ethos and values of the Foundation; to champion underrepresented, minority or disadvantaged communities in the UK.
“MPs under investigation or suspension would not be included. As such, Chris Williamson’s nomination could not be taken forward this year, as he is currently suspended from the Labour Party.”
This year, Jeremy Corbyn was nominated and – wonder of wonders! – his Labour Party membership has been suspended.
So – wonder of wonders! – suddenly the Patchwork Foundation is apparently saying there are “irregularities in the voting count” and it will only release the choice of the judges’ panel instead.
I think James Foster may have drawn the correct conclusion:
“Due to irregularities in the voting count we will postpone this year’s public vote and instead release the results for the judge’s panel only.”
What they mean is: @JeremyCorbyn got too many and they didn’t like it.
We see you, @UKPatchwork. https://t.co/tTK0sFuCTb
— James Foster (@JamesEFoster) November 15, 2020
He’s not the only one:
It seems “voting irregularities” means too many people voted for the *wrong* candidate(s) – see NEC and MP of the Year
(Managed “democracy”)
— Tom London (@TomLondon6) November 15, 2020
So this MP of the Year thing from Patchwork got pulled due to unusual voting irregularities?
Trumptastic.
I think that means @jeremycorbyn was miles ahead and they didn’t fancy giving it the gong to a man who has been wrongfully suspended from the Labour Party.
— Rachael Swindon (@Rachael_Swindon) November 15, 2020
This Site has contacted Patchwork for a comment.
If there is interference in the public vote – to remove the most popular candidate because he is considered undesirable in some way, and for a second year running – then these awards have fallen into disrepute and should be discontinued.
Have YOU donated to my crowdfunding appeal, raising funds to fight false libel claims by TV celebrities who should know better? These court cases cost a lot of money so every penny will help ensure that wealth doesn’t beat justice.
Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
(but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:
Here are four ways to be sure you’re among the first to know what’s going on.
1) Register with us by clicking on ‘Subscribe’ (in the left margin). You can then receive notifications of every new article that is posted here.
2) Follow VP on Twitter @VoxPolitical
3) Like the Facebook page at https://www.facebook.com/VoxPolitical/
Join the Vox Political Facebook page.
4) You could even make Vox Political your homepage at http://voxpoliticalonline.com
And do share with your family and friends – so they don’t miss out!
If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!
Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.
The Livingstone Presumption is now available
in either print or eBook format here:
Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:
The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:
Oh Jeremy Corbyn but they don’t like the truth