Disabled benefit claimant sends in the bailiffs after suing Atos for negligence
More people need to do this.
A benefit claimant whose partner recorded her Personal Independence Payment assessment interview successfully sued Atos for negligence and failure of its duty of care after her payments were stopped.
She then sent in the bailiffs to enforce the country court’s ruling after the outsourcing giant refused to pay up.
The claimant, known as Rebecca, had to spend two years fighting to get her PIP reinstated after it was wrongly stopped on the basis of false information provided by the assessor.
Rebecca has epilepsy and a resulting heart condition, anxiety, depression and memory problems but her entitlement to the enhanced daily living component of PIP, along with her claim to the benefit itself, was removed by the Department for Work and Pensions on the basis of the assessment.
Eventually she was able to put her case before an appeal panel who listened to the recording of the assessment, compared it with the assessor’s account of the interview, and promptly restored her entitlement to PIP – and to the enhanced rate of the daily living component – until 2023.
Rebecca was so angry at the way she had been treated by Atos and the DWP that she decided to take the assessment firm to court, suing for “mental distress, anxiety and hardship”.
Atos did not bother to defend the claim, which resulted in an award of £2,500 for Rebecca, in compensation and damages.
Perhaps the firm simply thought it could shrug away her attempts to claim the money?
Not so. When Atos failed to pay, she sent the bailiffs in to its London offices, creating a further cost of £2,000.
This is a huge victory – not just financially but morally – for benefit claimants whose claims have been cancelled under false pretences, based on inaccurate assessment reports.
It happened because the assessment was recorded – something that the DWP has resisted for years. Now we know why: it stops that government department from wrongly knocking people off its books. This is a strong indication that every benefit claimant should record their interview.
Atos may wish to consider that the award against it was enlarged because of the length of time it took Rebecca to win her case.
I don’t have the full details but I’m willing to bet this was due to the “mandatory reassessment” malarkey imposed by the DWP, which means claimants have to wait – with no cash to live on – while officers of the department consider whether the decision to cut their benefit was right.
Usually they decide it was, and it is only then that claimants can appeal to a tribunal. Most appeals are won by the claimant.
This Writer would therefore urge anybody who has recorded their assessment, lost benefits, and had to appeal to get them back, to follow Rebecca’s example: don’t just take the money – take legal action!
Once Atos and the DWP have lost a few more cases, they might actually give up and agree that their system is unfair and has to change.
Source: Claimant Successfully Sues Atos And Sends In The Bailiffs When They Don’t Pay Up | Same Difference
Have YOU donated to my crowdfunding appeal, raising funds to fight false libel claims by TV celebrities who should know better? These court cases cost a lot of money so every penny will help ensure that wealth doesn’t beat justice.
Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
(but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:
Here are four ways to be sure you’re among the first to know what’s going on.
1) Register with us by clicking on ‘Subscribe’ (in the left margin). You can then receive notifications of every new article that is posted here.
2) Follow VP on Twitter @VoxPolitical
3) Like the Facebook page at https://www.facebook.com/VoxPolitical/
Join the Vox Political Facebook page.
4) You could even make Vox Political your homepage at http://voxpoliticalonline.com
And do share with your family and friends – so they don’t miss out!
If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!
Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.
The Livingstone Presumption is now available
in either print or eBook format here:
Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:
The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:
I’d rather doubt it they making far to much monies from government contracts but many more need to roar at how they are assessed by these very highly trained Hcp. Iv always said carry a portable recorder in pocket or bag recording goes a long way and it shows how these chalitans get away with it they tell you not to but don’t tell just do it
How could she afford to sue? or was it through the small claims court? Even so this must have been pretty stressful. Disabled people cannot afford to fight for justice, and the Tories had well designed plan to stop us- cut legal aid.
Good!!! Well done that woman!!! Bastards need to be held to account. Have experienced the ‘process’ and won – lying conniving scum to put it nicely, but didn’t think to go any further than the tribunal. If or rather when the next time aries I will consider following the same route – Well done ‘Rebecca’ setting an example standing up for your rights and then some!
Corporatization of our public services including education, health and prison services as well as many others provided by local authorities including Housing Association housing, have become the Tory answer to the socialist principle of democratically managed public services.
The public probably do not care…..as long as the services work to their benefit and the Tory’s sell corporatization as being more efficient…….
Corporatization seems to be a Trojan horse that undermines public accountability of public service.
CiCs, Trusts and Associations with the freedom to have over paid CEOs and Directors should be condemned by Labour. Can the Labour executive please give clear guidelines for an alterative?
Yeap they understand the colour of money, wonder if this was filmed for can’t pay we take it away, that would be the only time as a debt collector that would make that job enjoyable
Now THAT would be worth watching!