Isn’t Labour’s new employment policy hypocritical, as Starmer practises ‘fire and rehire’?
How can Keir Starmer seriously propose banning ‘fire and rehire’ policies by employers when he has brought that odious practice to the Labour Party?
This Site reported on July 21 that Starmer has almost bankrupted Labour, making it necessary for the party to axe 90 full-time jobs.
At the same time, Starmer was hiring 30-50 staff on short-term contracts. I stated:
That’s ‘fire and rehire’ because you know some of the axed staff will have been doing the same work that the new employees will be asked to do – and some of these jobs will be occupied by the same people.
The mainstream media has picked up on this, with The Independent reporting on it only a day or so ago.
How tone-deaf, then, for Starmer to send his deputy leader, Angela Rayner, out to promote a policy that condemns ‘fire and rehire’!
Consider this, from the BBC’s article on the new policy:
Labour also says it wants to outlaw “fire and rehire” practices whereby employers dismiss workers and then offer to hire them back under new, often poorer, terms and conditions.
That is exactly what Starmer is doing.
The new policy has other holes that have led critics to claim that it is merely tinkering around the edges of employment law and not revolutionising it at all.
For example, the “real living wage” of £10 per hour has been attacked as not being enough to lift anybody out of dependence on state benefits or – in extreme cases – food banks.
This is simply not good enough.
Under Jeremy Corbyn, Labour devised policies that would have changed the UK from a country that exploits its population for the benefit of a tiny minority – which is what it is now, and don’t you forget it – into a progressive, trailblazing nation that valued all of its citizens.
Our success as a nation would have been valued, not by the number of billionaires we had, but by the absence of poverty.
But Starmer isn’t interested in this.
His plan isn’t revolutionary. It is hypocritical and so is he.
And the truth of that is clear to everybody.
Have YOU donated to my crowdfunding appeal, raising funds to fight false libel claims by TV celebrities who should know better? These court cases cost a lot of money so every penny will help ensure that wealth doesn’t beat justice.
Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
(but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:
Here are four ways to be sure you’re among the first to know what’s going on.
1) Register with us by clicking on ‘Subscribe’ (in the left margin). You can then receive notifications of every new article that is posted here.
2) Follow VP on Twitter @VoxPolitical
3) Like the Facebook page at https://www.facebook.com/VoxPolitical/
Join the Vox Political Facebook page.
4) You could even make Vox Political your homepage at http://voxpoliticalonline.com
And do share with your family and friends – so they don’t miss out!
If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!
Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.
The Livingstone Presumption is now available
in either print or eBook format here:
Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:
The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:
Why can I not make a comment on your web site, unless I make a donation? I cannot even post this message due to the fact I have to pay a crowd fund fee. I really am skint. I know this comment will not go any further due to the fact I haven’t got the dough to make it happen. Mike, you are no better than the people you are calling down.
There is no requirement to make a donation before being permitted to comment, as anybody reading This Site knows perfectly well – including you.
Why are you trying to lie about this?
Who the heck put this monkey in charge of the Laboutmr party.. SIR?? guffuw..