Rabid Starmerites need a reality check. Here it is
This is bitterly amusing.
After my article yesterday, Critics of Labour are being wrongly labelled ‘Tory enablers’. Let’s put the record straight, I found a response from a prolific pro-Starmer commenter in the ‘Trash’ file of the comment system (which clearly has a well-developed sense of taste).
It asked, “Which of the policies that were announced and/or confirmed at this years party conference are either Tory or Fascist.” As if that would settle the matter.
Do you like the wording – the attempt to restrict me to policies from the party conference? I did.
Of course it was setting up a false argument because none of those policies matter one whit.
Keir Starmer lied his way into the Labour Party leadership and he has been lying ever since.
He was elected on 10 pledges that he has since abandoned in their entirety and I have absolutely no doubt that he will also abandon any policy he has announced since then – whether at the party conference or not – as soon as they become inconvenient to him.
Here’s a tweet, in response to a similar Starmerite, if anybody needs clarification of this point:
Just a quick shout out, Keir Starmer literally won the leadership claiming to be a completely different person with a completely different set of objectives and values. pic.twitter.com/kK1xuN8kL1
— Daniel Grigg (@Daniel_Grigg) November 25, 2021
Starmer’s words mean nothing at all. Those of us who criticise him aren’t paying any attention to his empty words – because we are watching what he is actually doing.
This evidence reveals that he has spent the whole of his time as leader conducting a protracted persecution of his own party members – particularly left-wing Jews, making this an anti-Semitic attack as well – with false accusations of anti-Semitism that carry absolutely no weight in the real world – at the behest of his apparent masters at the Israeli Embassy.
It shows that he has supported Boris Johnson’s Conservative government when it has inflicted dazzlingly stupid and genocidal policies on us, such as almost every measure to do with Covid-19 that has been inflicted on us.
It shows that he can’t win elections because people see him as a pale blue Tory. The two mentioned by Howard Beckett, below, are just the latest in a long line:
Under Corbyn we won these seats. Under Starmer we just lost them. pic.twitter.com/GjMdzNWgOC
— Howard Beckett (@BeckettUnite) November 26, 2021
And it shows that he mistreats even his own MPs:
Has Keir Starmer ever said a positive or kindly word about Zarah Sultana? @UKLabour
— Daniel Grigg (@Daniel_Grigg) November 25, 2021
Keir Starmer has never offered a word of solidarity to Zarah Sultana. Not after she broke down in tears in Parliament describing the Islamophobia she’s faced. Not after she was told to “go back to your country” whilst on bereavement leave. Never. Why? https://t.co/bPM8SG7xpT
— Alex Nunns (@alexnunns) November 25, 2021
Because he’s a sexist, a racist and an Islamophobe, that’s why.
I’ve discussed Starmer’s treatment of Ms Sultana in a previous article as follows:
Now, that race hate and intolerance are making themselves clear within the ranks of the Parliamentary Labour Party, as it seems Starmer is planning to deselect four sitting MPs – for the crime of being black:
It seems the claim is that some in local party groups are stirring up unrest on the basis that some of the named black women were selected as supporters of Jeremy Corbyn, rather than as representatives of the people in the constituencies.
Among those facing deselection is Zarah Sultana, who is widely accepted to have been one of the most effective MPs in a Labour Party that has been rendered toothless by Starmer’s leadership:
She recently highlighted the racist abuse she receives from members of the public, posting on Twitter an email she received on her return from bereavement leave after the death of her grandmother:
What has Starmer done to support his MP in the face of this racism?
Nothing.
I’ll say it again:
He has done nothing.
He supports genocidal racists and he undermines people of colour in his own organisation – while pretending to be pious for the cameras.
What a verminous, racist hypocrite.
My words are supported by the evidence from Ms Sultana herself. She has given an interview to LabourList that is searing in comparison with that website’s usual deference to Starmer:
“You expect support and solidarity from people in your party.
“I haven’t had a single word of solidarity from the current leadership,” she says. “Angela Rayner, Nick Thomas-Symonds, Louise Haigh, Kim Leadbeater, all of those guys got in touch – and I didn’t get anything from the leadership at all.” In fact, she adds: “I’ve never spoken to Keir.” Asking questions at parliamentary party meetings is the closest they have had to a conversation, the Labour MP says.
Sultana believes that, as a young Muslim woman, she is treated differently not only by those who send abusive emails and letters, but also by her colleagues. “I learnt this lesson very early on,” she says. Sultana points out that her maiden speech referring to “40 years of Thatcherism” caused uproar, yet nobody blinked an eye when Lisa Nandy talked about “40 years of economic decline” during the leadership election and said “the consensus that Thatcher built lasted all the way through the New Labour years”. Sultana was told that senior MPs were advising other 2019 newcomers: “you don’t want to do what Zarah did with her maiden speech”.
Only a handful of Labour MPs have been reported as being particularly under threat of deselection, yet two of this small number are Muslim women. “To me, if we’re just talking about optics – and it shouldn’t just be about the optics, it should be about the people who are affected – that just doesn’t look very good,” Sultana observes. Asked about the chances of her being triggered, she says: “I have no sense that I’m more under threat than anyone else… I’m really hopeful that I will have [members’] support.”
“The people providing those quotes [for articles about her potential deselection] were citing things like Prevent, and they were citing things like Palestine… as though it’s not a normal concern to have,” she says. “I was really shocked because someone’s obviously given a green light to this.”
Yes indeed – and the buck stops with Keir Starmer.
So, judging Starmer by his actions, we see that he himself is a Tory supporter/enabler – that demonstrates the Tory aspect of his behaviour.
And for the fascism, look no further than the sexism, racism, Islamophobia, anti-Semitism and persecution that has characterised his attitude towards his own party members.
Have YOU donated to my crowdfunding appeal, raising funds to fight false libel claims by TV celebrities who should know better? These court cases cost a lot of money so every penny will help ensure that wealth doesn’t beat justice.
Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
(but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:
Here are four ways to be sure you’re among the first to know what’s going on.
1) Register with us by clicking on ‘Subscribe’ (in the left margin). You can then receive notifications of every new article that is posted here.
2) Follow VP on Twitter @VoxPolitical
3) Like the Facebook page at https://www.facebook.com/VoxPolitical/
Join the Vox Political Facebook page.
4) You could even make Vox Political your homepage at http://voxpoliticalonline.com
And do share with your family and friends – so they don’t miss out!
If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!
Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.
The Livingstone Presumption is now available
in either print or eBook format here:
Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:
The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:
I suppose I should feel honoured that you’ve dedicated a whole article to one of my comments but the fact remains that everything that I said in my comment is accurate. You are more than welcome to try and prove otherwise.
If you are going to expend a whole article having a go at something I’ve written then the very least I would expect is that you would have the courtesy to publish my comment in full rather than your own selective misinterpretations.
ps – Given the very high threshold introduced by Keir it seems unlikely that any of these ladies will be ‘triggered’ (one of them is currently a shadow minister) but if they are it will be by a process that is entirely in the hands of their CLPs and local members. Its called democracy.
https://labourlist.org/2021/11/are-taiwo-owatemi-and-zarah-sultana-under-threat-of-deselection/
Ha ha! That’s very funny. Democracy in the Labour Party. Oh dear, oh dear.
Haven’t you realised that practically every news article about Labour these days is about how the leadership has been BYPASSING party democracy whenever Starmer and his cronies feel like it? If not, you need to take a good, hard look around yourself.
Oh dear, Steve, don’t get delusions of grandeur! I published the only part of your comment that was worth mentioning because the rest – as I point out in the article – isn’t worth mentioning. Here today, gone tomorrow like all of Starmer’s other promises. I never suggested that your list – which was the everything else you had to say – wasn’t accurate. It simply doesn’t matter. So of course I have no interest in trying to prove an argument I haven’t made.
Why are you trying to suggest that I said something I didn’t?