After the elections: should both Boris Johnson AND Keir Starmer lose their jobs?

All in it together: neither Boris Johnson nor Keir Starmer fared well in the local government elections, and both may have broken Covid-19 lockdown laws. So it may be appropriate for both their jobs to be in danger.

There’s no doubt about it: the local elections have been a disaster for the Conservatives – and far from a victory for the Labour Party.

The Tories have lost 490 council seats in England, Wales and Scotland, with blame being placed squarely on the shoulders of Boris Johnson for his Partygate scandal and his failure to keep the cost of living within reasonable levels.

Conservative MPs are certain to be discussing whether Johnson has a future as prime minister over the next few days, before starting to make decisions about it after the new Parliamentary session begins.

They will also discuss the policy direction of Johnson’s government, with Yeovil MP Marcus Fysh quoted by the BBC as saying, “I do think radical change in the policy is required and, if it doesn’t happen, there really isn’t an electoral future for the party, because I think it will get crucified at the next election having bombed the economy.

“And if the team [running the government] is not able to adapt to reality, then the team needs to make way for someone else.”

But Labour – or at least Keir Starmer’s side of it – is in an equally precarious situation after voters gave a lukewarm response to his offer.

His party made some gains in London – and crowed about taking over Westminster, Wandsworth and Barnet councils from the Tories – but lost Harrow council to the Tories, while the mayoralties of Croydon and Tower Hamlets also went to a Tory and to Lutfur Rahman and his Aspire organisation respectively.

Labour gains outside London were hardly worth mentioning. It took the new Cumberland unitary authority, and Southampton – but failed to take authorities where it had been expected to make gains, including Hartlepool, Peterborough, Redditch and Ipswich.

While the Tories have lost support in the south of England, Labour lost more in the north. It seems to have drained from both parties to the Liberal Democrats and the Green Party.

Of all Labour’s net gains – 137 seats, 65 of them were in Wales where the party is led by “continuity Corbyn” First Minister Mark Drakeford. The contrast is made more clear if we compare Labour’s gains with those of the Greens.

In England, Labour gained 52 seats while the Greens gained 60.

In Scotland, Labour won 20 seats with the Greens close behind on 16.

But in Wales, Labour was boosted by 65 seats, while the Greens could only muster up an extra eight.

The message is clear: the voting public doesn’t want Starmer’s tepid Tory policies; we want a genuine alternative to the Conservative nightmare that has engulfed the UK for more than 12 years, and we won’t be told his party of empty suits is the only alternative.

Indeed, as Skwawkbox quoted a left-winger in Harrow: “Despite expelling their best activists, despite purging all the left who wanted to stand despite disenfranchising in a most brutal persistent fashion, [Labour has] shown a talent for catastrophe with all [its] handpicked candidates.”

But you won’t hear that from Starmer himself! He’s living in a fantasy England where Labour is on the crest of a wave: “From the depths in 2019 we are back on track now for the general election, showing what the change that we’ve done, the hard change that we’ve done in the last two years, what a difference it has made.”

He actually claimed the results marked a “massive turning-point for the Labour Party”.

So perhaps it is just as well that he is about to have his attention occupied by a police investigation into whether he broke the law by having a beer in a Labour MP’s office during Covid-19 lockdown.

Durham Police had said it would not re-open an investigation into the incident in April last year, when Starmer was taking part in an online event ahead of a by-election in neighbouring Hartlepool.

But immediately after the local elections took place, the service changed its story, saying it had received “significant new information” but had delayed an announcement until after the vote.

If the finding is that the Labour leader did break the law, he will face calls from Tory MPs demanding that he resign. Sauce for the goose; he has demanded Boris Johnson’s resignation after the prime minister was fined for the same offence, after all. And if Starmer is fined, both leaders will be said to have lied about it.

But there is a significant difference between them: Johnson drew up the rules by which he demanded the rest of us should live, and it was on his behalf that police forces across the UK enforced those rules. He then deliberately broke those rules. And then he lied about having broken them to Parliament, which is an offence for which an MP may be expelled.

Starmer may have merely broken the rules while believing he was following them.

Ultimately, the difference may be irrelevant; Starmer has failed to win convincingly in a midterm election and is therefore unlikely to win a general election, so his party’s “grey suits” may use the so-called “BeerGate” affair as an excuse to remove him.

Either way, it seems clear that neither the Tory nor Labour leader should feel secure in their jobs.

Have YOU donated to my crowdfunding appeal, raising funds to fight false libel claims by TV celebrities who should know better? These court cases cost a lot of money so every penny will help ensure that wealth doesn’t beat justice.

Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:

Donate Button with Credit Cards

Here are four ways to be sure you’re among the first to know what’s going on.

1) Register with us by clicking on ‘Subscribe’ (in the left margin). You can then receive notifications of every new article that is posted here.

2) Follow VP on Twitter @VoxPolitical

3) Like the Facebook page at

Join the Vox Political Facebook page.

4) You could even make Vox Political your homepage at

And do share with your family and friends – so they don’t miss out!

If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!

Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.

The Livingstone Presumption is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:



  1. Martyn Meacham. May 7, 2022 at 2:42 pm - Reply

    Most definitely, both are proven liars and frauds, both are totally weak and useless, and corrupt to the enth degree….Both have no intention of serving Britain or the British people….Starmer is serving the interests of Israel, which makes him a traitor to Britain The tories are serving the interests of Russia, which makes them traitors as well….

  2. Paul May 7, 2022 at 3:15 pm - Reply

    Correction: Ipswich was already a Labour council. Of the 17 seats contested, only 4 were held by Tories and they lost 2 of them (see

    • Mike Sivier May 7, 2022 at 3:24 pm - Reply

      That mistake courtesy of Sky News. Thanks for the correction!

  3. jimsylastra May 7, 2022 at 4:14 pm - Reply

    Johnson should have resigned months ago. Not Starmer.

  4. Glynis Millward May 7, 2022 at 4:35 pm - Reply

    So … who would be LOTO instead of Starmer because wouldn’t internal nominations just lead to the same or similar?

    • Mike Sivier May 8, 2022 at 11:02 am - Reply

      That would be in line with a favourite definition of insanity from a while ago – doing the same thing and expecting a different result.

      One would hope that Labour’s leading lights (if the party still has any) would realise this and modify the party’s direction, no matter who they chose to lead.

  5. Phillip Hurley May 7, 2022 at 4:46 pm - Reply

    Yes they should, you can’t have a law breaker in government , they are all theives

  6. Malc May 7, 2022 at 5:44 pm - Reply

    But who to replace these two supreme duds?
    For the Tories it was a poisoned chalice. May was the only one desperate enough, and for Boris it was blind, mad ambition..Truss is a joke. A runt.
    Look at who sits behind Starmer! More political runts.

  7. Stephen Brophy May 8, 2022 at 8:31 am - Reply

    the usual suspects un the media but especially from the beeb are saying labour didn’t do as well as expected largely down to “long corbyn!” so they are still trying to gaslight the public two years later! shiws how scared they were of socialism they were!!

  8. mohandeer May 8, 2022 at 9:49 am - Reply

    I have only ever voted Labour when Corbyn was leader. Starmer is no different than Toxic Tony who surrounded himself with “yes” men and lost a few million voters by removing any vestige of democracy from what was and still should be a “Democratic Socialist” party.
    Bungling Boris serves only himself and his cronies and the elites/corporates with his abuse of power and our taxes in the way he dealt with Covid.
    BTW, there is a reason why Boris has Russian Oligarch friends like Ledvedev or whatever his name is and it has nothing to do with serving Russia’s interests, that’s why we have the largest concentration of billionaires in the world based in London. The Russian oligarchs fled Russia rather than face Putins purge of them and relieving them of their assets as traitors to the Russian people. How do “informed” Brits think Russia has defied all expectations with respect to the illegal sanctions imposed on them by the US/EU/NATO coalition?. It’s time people understood things like the Paris Treaty and UN Resolutions allowing for The Right To Self Determination – uninformed opinion is akin to ignorance for those who are Russophobic, Sinophobic, Islamaphobic and just generally haters.
    Johnson and Starmer have betrayed this country in more ways than is known and neither must be allowed to continue in their posts.

Leave A Comment