Liz Truss’s National Insurance ‘cut’ will help high earners massively – you get 63p per month

Last Updated: September 20, 2022By Tags: , , , ,

Yes – it’s another con from the Con Party.

Here’s the gist:

Now have some details:

Have YOU donated to my crowdfunding appeal, raising funds to fight false libel claims by TV celebrities who should know better? These court cases cost a lot of money so every penny will help ensure that wealth doesn’t beat justice.

https://www.crowdjustice.com/case/mike-sivier-libel-fight/


Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
(
but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:

Donate Button with Credit Cards

Here are four ways to be sure you’re among the first to know what’s going on.

1) Register with us by clicking on ‘Subscribe’ (in the left margin). You can then receive notifications of every new article that is posted here.

2) Follow VP on Twitter @VoxPolitical

3) Like the Facebook page at https://www.facebook.com/VoxPolitical/

Join the Vox Political Facebook page.

4) You could even make Vox Political your homepage at http://voxpoliticalonline.com

And do share with your family and friends – so they don’t miss out!

If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!

Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.


The Livingstone Presumption is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:

SWAHTprint SWAHTeBook

3 Comments

  1. Phillip Hurley September 21, 2022 at 7:25 am - Reply

    Typical of the rich torys

  2. Peter Martin September 21, 2022 at 11:35 am - Reply

    The poorest people in the UK probably don’t pay NI in any case so they’ll get nothing.

    Having said this I was against raising NI in the first place so it would be inconsistent to oppose removing the increase now.

    Anyone making these kinds of arguments will need to be able to show that they were in agreement with Rishi Sunak earlier in the year when he imposed the NI increase. I suspect they, including yourselves, won’t be able to do that.

    • Mike Sivier September 21, 2022 at 11:51 am - Reply

      The argument is that Truss is lying about (or too stupid to understand) what the cut will achieve.

      It is therefore entirely consistent to have opposed the rise when it was announced a year ago, and to point out that Truss is wrong now.

Leave A Comment