Keir Starmer is RIGHT about the Rwanda policy – for the wrong reasons
Take a look at the following – both the X post by Robert Jenrick and the interview clip on which it is based:
Q:Would you scrap the Rwanda policy even if it works?
Starmer: Yes.
Proof, if it were needed, that Labour don’t even want to stop the boats.
They are ideologically opposed to border controls. Their solution is to force British communities to tolerate this flagrant criminality. https://t.co/bsOZenlhin
— Robert Jenrick (@RobertJenrick) October 8, 2023
Jenrick’s claims are clearly false. Keir Starmer saying he doesn’t want to ship people who have migrated to the UK illegally off to Rwanda doesn’t mean he doesn’t want to stop the boats bringing them here in the first place.
Nor does it mean Starmer’s party (it isn’t Labour any more in anything but name) is ideologically opposed to border controls. We know that the last Labour government under Tony Blair and Gordon Brown had better controls than the Tories who have been in power since 2010.
That system was scrapped – some say in order to create a crisis and a bogeyman for the public to fear.
Starmer is right to imply that the Rwanda policy will not stop the criminal gangs who prey on refugees and asylum-seekers. There is no evidence to say that it will; in fact, figures show that after the policy was approved, the number of people arriving in the UK increased.
But he is wrong to say the ambition is to stop those gangs from plying their trade.
The ambition must always be to stop refugees and asylum-seekers wanting to leave their own country in the first place.
Negotiation is a good start – and it’s worth noting that the Tories are working on more agreements by which they would be able to return people to the countries from which they come to the UK.
But the negotiations need to be with the migrants’ countries of origin – to stop their governments creating the conditions that uproot these people in the first place. It’s not rocket science and This Writer has made the point time and time again in the past.
A good leverage point would be all the weapons export licences the UK government grants to these places. If they don’t improve the quality of life in their countries, the UK could refuse to export weapons to them.
Or is that far too sensible for Mr Starmer or any other politician?
Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
(but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:
Be among the first to know what’s going on! Here are the ways to manage it:
1) Register with us by clicking on ‘Subscribe’ (in the right margin). You can then receive notifications of every new article that is posted here.
2) Follow VP on Twitter @VoxPolitical
3) Like the Facebook page at https://www.facebook.com/VoxPolitical/
Join the Vox Political Facebook page.
4) You could even make Vox Political your homepage at http://voxpoliticalonline.com
5) Join the uPopulus group at https://upopulus.com/groups/vox-political/
6) Join the MeWe page at https://mewe.com/p-front/voxpolitical
7) Feel free to comment!
And do share with your family and friends – so they don’t miss out!
If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!
Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.
The Livingstone Presumption is now available
in either print or eBook format here:
Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:
The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:
Starmer and the fascist tories know that refusing export licences to countries engaged in war would cause the weapons industry boys to hysterically cry ‘wah what about our profits -we can never have too much money!’
Keir Starmer is correct in his stance on the Rwanda policy, but his motivations for supporting it may not align with the best interests of the situation.