Rishi Sunak: worst prime minister on TV since Alec Douglas-Home?
This Writer once saw a TV documentary about the 1964 general election campaign in which Labour’s Harold Wilson, easily the most intelligent person ever to have high office in the UK, walked all over then-Conservative prime minister Alec Douglas Home.
The reason? Home simply wasn’t good in front of a camera and Wilson was. The Tory looked awkward, sounded stiff and presented himself as someone who simply didn’t want to be bothered with people.
It’s possible that my interpretation of his campaign is coloured by the biases of the filmmakers, of course, but given the result of the election I doubt it.
Rishi Sunak looks like he’s going to be worse.
To start with, he doesn’t seem even to understand that he needs to look into a TV camera – or at least face in the right direction – when he’s speaking to the public through it.
He fell at even that simple hurdle when he addressed the GB News People’s Forum on Monday, making his opening remarks with his back to the camera.
And from there it went downhill. There’s a Guardian review in the article below…
Rishi Sunak "doesn’t believe what he’s saying, so why should we? He’s merely going through the motions. Someone should have a word. For his sanity as well as ours. It’s going to be a long eight months. Not all of us are going to get out of it alive."https://t.co/yPCEpWgudk
— GET A GRIP (@docrussjackson) February 13, 2024
… but let’s go straight for the red meat (of Sunak’s jugular?) and watch Peter Stefanovic’s summary of everything that was wrong about Sunak’s TV time:
If like me you’ve had enough of the absolute boll**** Rishi Sunak just fed GB News viewers in his “peoples forum” RT these FACTS widely pic.twitter.com/EgALVDAOCl
— Peter Stefanovic (@PeterStefanovi2) February 12, 2024
I’ve only got one full clip from the show – of when Sunak suggested his parents sent him to a private school because they had great aspirations for their children.
Labour’s Cat McKinnell called him out about it on ‘X’, although her words were clearly electioneering for her own party. Still, if you watch the clip, you can see what she means:
What an insult.
Parents of the 93% of children who attend state schools are also working hard and have great aspirations for their children.
A @UKLabour Government would ensure that every child in every school gets a great education, not just some of them. https://t.co/2VG02dyshN
— Catherine McKinnell (@CatMcKinnell) February 13, 2024
Here’s a more practical-minded response:
The fees at Rishi Sunak's former school are a whopping £49,152 per annum for boarding pupils.
That's before uniform, kit and all the extras parents pay.
The median average salary for full-time workers in the UK is £33,000
"Middle income families" cannot afford these schools https://t.co/KrDYD9aK8t
— Otto English (@Otto_English) February 13, 2024
The verdicts afterward were damning. This one is kind in comparison with most:
It wasn’t a debate, he wasn’t challenged, it wasn’t free speech. The vetted #GBNews audience didn’t ask about Covid fraud, his shares in Moderna, his wife’s fleecing of the taxpayer or how #Infosys profits have risen since he has been PM. Democracy is dead under Sunak. #SunakOut https://t.co/gAkM4teOmW pic.twitter.com/e94WgtXMIL
— Excluded and Forgotten (@AndExcluded) February 13, 2024
The people invited to form the audience and ask the questions had all been chosen by the polling firm Survation which, it seems, had been asked to fill the room with Conservatives.
At least, they were Conservatives going in.
On the way out it was a different story, as we see here:
The audience verdict on Rishi Sunak's GB News forum works well with the Curb Your Enthusiasm theme. pic.twitter.com/1Tm71BDhb4
— The Jase 🐶 🎸 🎥 (@jasemonkey) February 12, 2024
Only half of them came out saying they would still vote Tory.
Perhaps this is the most damning: a satirical poke at Sunak by suggesting his performance could become a segment on Would I Lie To You, with his part taken by legendary panellist Bob Mortimer:
"As Prime Minister I once went to a rigged Q+A session, run by a client journalist outfit, with paid for audience members and came out of it with a lower popularity rating." https://t.co/oP2x0ZqXXY pic.twitter.com/dtyr6m9rm2
— Colin the Dachshund (@DachshundColin) February 12, 2024
We all thought Theresa May was shockingly bad, back in 2017.
Now we know we can look forward to a summer of seeing our prime minister running away, not only from his responsibilities but from TV cameras, the public and – most probably – the reality that he’s going to lose the election and probably his own place in Parliament.
Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
(but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:
Be among the first to know what’s going on! Here are the ways to manage it:
1) Register with us by clicking on ‘Subscribe’ (in the right margin). You can then receive notifications of every new article that is posted here.
2) Follow VP on Twitter @VoxPolitical
3) Like the Facebook page at https://www.facebook.com/VoxPolitical/
Join the Vox Political Facebook page.
4) You could even make Vox Political your homepage at http://voxpoliticalonline.com
5) Join the uPopulus group at https://upopulus.com/groups/vox-political/
6) Join the MeWe page at https://mewe.com/p-front/voxpolitical
7) Feel free to comment!
And do share with your family and friends – so they don’t miss out!
If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!
Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.
Cruel Britannia is available
in either print or eBook format here:
The Livingstone Presumption is available
in either print or eBook format here:
Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:
The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here: