Commons Speaker should resign after hypocrisy over Diane Abbott
Prime Minister’s Questions this week (Wednesday, March 13, 2024) was unsurprisingly dominated by one issue: the racist comments by the Conservative Party’s biggest donor – Frank Hester – against a black, female member of Parliament who is currently under suspension from the Labour Party – Diane Abbott.
Questioner after questioner was called to discuss Hester’s transgression with Rishi Sunak, with one notable exception – Diane Abbott.
According to Sky News, she stood up no fewer than 46 times:
Diane Abbott has criticised the Speaker after he failed to call on her during today's Prime Minister's Questions, despite standing up 46 times. https://t.co/fxUUioyVWW pic.twitter.com/U80wgNtJ6P
— Sky News (@SkyNews) March 13, 2024
Watch this compilation video, which shows Ms Abbott – in an eye-catching red coat at the back of the Opposition benches – standing in the hope of catching Speaker Lyndsay Hoyle’s attention, so that she could take part in the discussion of her own safety… and being ignored, every time. I include Colin Patton’s remark so you can read it:
Speaker's excuse for overriding an SNP day was his concern for MPs safety.
Yet he doesn't allow Diane Abbott to question the PM who is saying an apology from a man who called for her to be shot should be accepted. Not the PM's right to accept any apology it's up to Diane Abbott.— Colin Patton (@colinpatton10) March 13, 2024
Did Hoyle and the others staining the House of Commons think nobody would notice this extreme – and extended – act of disrespect to a woman who has already suffered enough disrespect over this issue – and more disrespect, simply because she is a black, female MP, than everybody else in the building put together?
If they did, they were wrong:
Perhaps I am a daft old bat, but this photo has literally brought me to tears.
The endless abuse that poor woman suffers, played out in front of her by a Speaker of the HoC that won't even recognise her right to be able to address it.
I curse on all their houses! Awful, awful… https://t.co/laFnTKTDVF— CrémantCommunarde #BeAPeacemonger ☮️ (@0Calamity) March 13, 2024
Curious as to why no one made a Point of Order during #PMQs when it became obvious that @HackneyAbbott wasn’t going to be called, despite the fact that half of it was about her. Even if it disrupted proceedings & highlighted the issue, surely it would have been worth it? 🤔 pic.twitter.com/Qdze0geu9e
— Ben Sellers (@MrBenSellers) March 13, 2024
I was sat next to Diane at PMQs today.
She had questions asked for her, mostly by men — who may not have let her know that they planned to do so — as per the rules.
Then she herself was not called.
Fundamentally wrong that she was denied a chance to even speak for herself.
— Apsana Begum MP (@ApsanaBegumMP) March 13, 2024
What we just witnessed during PMQs was coordinated antiblackness in the workplace. Not an oversight.
— UK's No1 Race Baiter (@UnknownMe82) March 13, 2024
What a shame that Ms Abbott did not follow the example of former MP Bernadette Devlin, in similar circumstances:
It’s Parliamentary tradition that if an MP is involved in/ witnesses an incident they are ALWAYS called.
In 1972 the speaker refused to call Bernadette Devlin MP after Bloody Sunday, allowing the Home Sec to lie about it instead. Devlin walked over & slapped him.
Just saying. https://t.co/tM1gxJzbLe pic.twitter.com/wqXfokmsAu
— Dr Louise Raw (@LouiseRawAuthor) March 13, 2024
Ms Abbott’s response was more dignified:
I don't know whose interests the Speaker thinks he is serving. But it is not the interests of the Commons or democracy.https://t.co/W4vuBb18gD
— Diane Abbott MP (@HackneyAbbott) March 13, 2024
The decision to ignore Parliamentary tradition has led to an obvious demand – here presented by possibly the most visible person able to make it. Looking at Ms Abbott’s comment, it is entirely possible that she supports this:
The Speaker of the House of Commons must resign
— George Galloway MP (@georgegalloway) March 13, 2024
Lyndsay Hoyle has, of course, ignored Parliamentary traditions and conventions before. I refer specifically to the moment he allowed a Labour amendment to the SNP’s motion for a ceasefire in Gaza to be discussed, in breach of convention, saying it was because MPs had received threats (I’ve never understood how allowing the Labour amendment that favours Israel negated the alleged threat from “Islamists”).
He said – well, hear it for yourself:
"I have a duty of care, and I say that, and if my mistake is looking after members, I am guilty*"
Unless they're black female socialists, eh Lindsay?pic.twitter.com/IUEzxtJCrN
— Saul Staniforth (@SaulStaniforth) March 13, 2024
Isn’t it odd that, the other time, he said he was “looking after members”, whereas this time he was deliberately disrespecting one of them?
Stephen Flynn, Westminster leader of the SNP, said as much in a TV interview after PMQs finished – and echoed calls for Hoyle to be removed:
Adam Parsons, "Why didn't we hear from Diane Abbott?" @adamparsons
Stephen Flynn, "Diane has to have the floor of the House of Commons in order to express her views.. And the Speaker of the House of Commons decided she wasn't going to have a voice" @StephenFlynnSNP pic.twitter.com/UYlr6L4p5e
— Farrukh (@implausibleblog) March 13, 2024
It’s the hypocrisy that leads This Writer to agree that it is time for Hoyle to go. He has disgraced the Speaker’s Chair, and the office of the Speaker, once too often.
(He won’t, of course, because these people have no shame.)
What’s the result? Well, there’s this on the Tory side of the story:
People who defended Boris Johnson’s use of ‘watermelon smiles’ ‘piccanninnies’ ‘bumboys’ & ‘letterbox’ as satire will continue to say that Frank Hester meant it as a joke. Meanwhile I, every person of colour, and our white allies, are exhausted & disgusted by our government. https://t.co/9sii8S9ezn
— Faye K (@FayeKamsika) March 13, 2024
Worse – and you’re forgiven if you didn’t think that was possible – is Labour’s response, which is to try to make a bit of money off of it, despite the fact that Ms Abbott’s membership of the Parliamentary Labour Party has been suspended for nearly a year:
The abuse aimed at Diane Abbott by a Tory donor is being used by @UKLabour to asks for donations for @UKLabour
Diane Abbot has been suspended from the PLP for 11 months.@Keir_Starmer this is galling. pic.twitter.com/EE3ixscGBr
— Greg Herriett (@greg_herriett) March 13, 2024
Trying to cash in on racism against someone who has been a victim of racist abuse from Labour figures and doesn't even have the whip due to factional reasons.
These are truly despicable people. https://t.co/BXvfHiuJoO
— j (@jrc1921) March 13, 2024
Here is what This Writer considers to be an almost supernaturally reasonable response to this wave of hypocrisy from the Labour Party:
I can barely believe Labour has the audacity to post this. It protected right wing Labour members who made similar racist, misogynist comments about Diane. It failed to protect Diane, removed the whip from her and treated White male MPs more favourably. https://t.co/HyOm4io0kh
— Pamela Fitzpatrick (@pamelafitz4HW) March 11, 2024
(Pamela Fitzpatrick is, by the way, standing as an Independent candidate in the currently Labour-held constituency of Harrow West. If you live there, please support her with your vote.)
And in case anybody has forgotten what kind of person she is, let’s give the last word to Ms Abbott’s long-term left-wing Labour colleague – and former party leader – Jeremy Corbyn:
If Parliament had listened to Diane Abbott:
We wouldn't have invaded Iraq.
Black Britons wouldn't have been deported in the Windrush Scandal.
Our country wouldn't have been decimated by austerity.
Diane's voice should not be ignored —her ongoing mistreatment is a disgrace.
— Jeremy Corbyn (@jeremycorbyn) March 13, 2024
Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
(but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:
Be among the first to know what’s going on! Here are the ways to manage it:
1) Register with us by clicking on ‘Subscribe’ (in the right margin). You can then receive notifications of every new article that is posted here.
2) Follow VP on Twitter @VoxPolitical
3) Like the Facebook page at https://www.facebook.com/VoxPolitical/
Join the Vox Political Facebook page.
4) You could even make Vox Political your homepage at http://voxpoliticalonline.com
5) Join the uPopulus group at https://upopulus.com/groups/vox-political/
6) Join the MeWe page at https://mewe.com/p-front/voxpolitical
7) Feel free to comment!
And do share with your family and friends – so they don’t miss out!
If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!
Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.
Cruel Britannia is available
in either print or eBook format here:
The Livingstone Presumption is available
in either print or eBook format here:
Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:
The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:
Part of Hester’s ‘defence’ of his remarks was that he is not racist because he ‘does not hate black people’
This is often a defence to racism allegations and is, sadly, very wrong. Go back in history, perhaps less than a hundred years officially and perhaps fifty years unofficially, and you will find that the general perception was NOT always one of hate. Many ordinary people believed, and were led to believe, that black people were ‘savages’ and ‘less intelligent’ They were to be pitied. In the school system in the 70s black children were still being treated as though this were true. Those reinforcing those beliefs truly thought that they were not racist but that these ‘views’ were true.
Racism isn’t necessarily about hate. It’s about being treated differently, it’s about being regarded as ‘less than’
We need to challenge this at every opportunity and we need to say why..