Here’s how the changes in sickness and disability benefits might affect you, if Liz Kendall’s announcement left you feeling lost.
This Writer was left confused by it – I’m happy to admit – so I did a bit of research, and I came up with what follows:
A transcription of the relevant information is below.
I am particularly keen to read your comments about this – especially if it is likely to affect you. How do you think it will? Let us know.
Here’s the transcript:
These reforms are expected to impact various groups of people in distinct ways depending on the nature and severity of their conditions. Here’s a breakdown of how it could affect different groups:
1. Mental Health Conditions
People with mental health conditions such as depression, anxiety, and PTSD may face significant challenges. These conditions are often harder to quantify using the current benefit assessment models, leading to increased difficulty in proving eligibility.
Buy Cruel Britannia in print here. Buy the Cruel Britannia ebook here. Or just click on the image!
More frequent reassessments could be particularly distressing for those with fluctuating mental health conditions, as the process may exacerbate their symptoms.
Tighter eligibility for benefits like Personal Independence Payments (PIP) might leave some without the financial support they need, especially since mental health issues are often underreported and misunderstood in assessments.
Mental health advocates are concerned that the system could further stigmatize these conditions, making it harder to access necessary support.
For those with chronic pain or physical disabilities that fluctuate, like arthritis or fibromyalgia, the benefit system might not fully capture the episodic nature of these conditions.
The tighter eligibility criteria and frequent reassessments may mean that individuals who are in pain but can still perform minimal tasks are deemed ineligible for benefits.
For people whose symptoms improve temporarily or who can work part-time in certain conditions, the pressure to enter employment could conflict with their ability to manage their condition effectively.
3. Severe Physical Disabilities (e.g., Paralysis, Severe Mobility Issues)
People with severe physical disabilities are often more likely to qualify for benefits due to the visible and debilitating nature of their conditions. However, even among this group, those with more moderate disabilities may face challenges.
Although some may qualify for continued support, others with less severe conditions might see their benefits reduced or reassessed.
PIP could be harder to claim if there are changes in how the “daily living” and “mobility” criteria are applied. People with lower levels of physical disability, but still with significant impairments, may lose vital support.
4. Learning Disabilities and Autism
People with learning disabilities and autism may face the challenge of being misunderstood or misjudged by the assessment system.
Eligibility tightening could result in individuals with learning disabilities who need support to live independently being disqualified.
The assessment process often does not fully account for the nuances of developmental conditions, potentially leaving many ineligible or underfunded.
People with autism, especially those who are able to work part-time or have mild symptoms, may face challenges in proving their need for support.
5. Older Adults and Age-Related Conditions
Older adults suffering from age-related health issues like dementia or osteoarthritis may find themselves needing benefits but facing a more restrictive assessment process.
People with dementia or cognitive impairments might struggle with the increased frequency of reassessments, which could cause confusion or anxiety, worsening their health.
Eligibility could also be affected for those whose conditions are progressive but not necessarily severe enough to meet the criteria for full support.
Those with invisible conditions like Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS) or irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) often face difficulty in proving their conditions through standard assessments.
People with these conditions may face more scrutiny due to the nature of their symptoms being harder to detect in a medical exam.
More frequent reassessments and tighter eligibility criteria may force individuals into situations where their health deteriorates as they are pushed to participate in assessments or work when they are not ready.
Overall Concerns for All Groups:
Financial Hardship: With many disabled individuals being pushed into poverty or financial uncertainty, there could be negative long-term health consequences as people are forced to choose between working and managing their health.
Impact on Employment: The push to get people into employment could work for some, but for others, especially those with fluctuating or invisible conditions, this could mean more pressure, more stress, and worsening health.
Support Systems: These reforms might undermine support systems, particularly for people who need tailored interventions, as the one-size-fits-all approach to reassessments and eligibility doesn’t always take into account individual circumstances.
In conclusion, the changes could disproportionately affect people with conditions that are harder to diagnose or that fluctuate over time. For example, someone with a mental health disorder or an invisible chronic illness may find it harder to prove the extent of their need for benefits, making the system harder to navigate. In contrast, people with visible and more stable conditions might be less affected by these reforms but still face increased pressure to work or undergo frequent assessments.
Advocacy groups and experts have raised concerns that these reforms might ultimately cause more harm than good, potentially exacerbating inequalities faced by disabled people in the UK.
Vox Political needs your help! If you want to support this site
(but don’t want to give your money to advertisers) you can make a one-off donation here:
Be among the first to know what’s going on! Here are the ways to manage it:
1) Register with us by clicking on ‘Subscribe’ (bottom right of the home page). You can then receive notifications of every new article that is posted here.
5) Follow Vox Political writer Mike Sivier on BlueSky
6) Join the MeWe page at https://mewe.com/p-front/voxpolitical
7) Feel free to comment!
And do share with your family and friends – so they don’t miss out!
If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!
How the changes in sickness and disability benefits might affect you
Here’s how the changes in sickness and disability benefits might affect you, if Liz Kendall’s announcement left you feeling lost.
This Writer was left confused by it – I’m happy to admit – so I did a bit of research, and I came up with what follows:
A transcription of the relevant information is below.
I am particularly keen to read your comments about this – especially if it is likely to affect you. How do you think it will? Let us know.
Here’s the transcript:
These reforms are expected to impact various groups of people in distinct ways depending on the nature and severity of their conditions. Here’s a breakdown of how it could affect different groups:
1. Mental Health Conditions
People with mental health conditions such as depression, anxiety, and PTSD may face significant challenges. These conditions are often harder to quantify using the current benefit assessment models, leading to increased difficulty in proving eligibility.
Buy Cruel Britannia in print here. Buy the Cruel Britannia ebook here. Or just click on the image!
More frequent reassessments could be particularly distressing for those with fluctuating mental health conditions, as the process may exacerbate their symptoms.
Tighter eligibility for benefits like Personal Independence Payments (PIP) might leave some without the financial support they need, especially since mental health issues are often underreported and misunderstood in assessments.
Mental health advocates are concerned that the system could further stigmatize these conditions, making it harder to access necessary support.
2. Chronic Physical Conditions (e.g., Arthritis, Fibromyalgia)
For those with chronic pain or physical disabilities that fluctuate, like arthritis or fibromyalgia, the benefit system might not fully capture the episodic nature of these conditions.
The tighter eligibility criteria and frequent reassessments may mean that individuals who are in pain but can still perform minimal tasks are deemed ineligible for benefits.
For people whose symptoms improve temporarily or who can work part-time in certain conditions, the pressure to enter employment could conflict with their ability to manage their condition effectively.
3. Severe Physical Disabilities (e.g., Paralysis, Severe Mobility Issues)
People with severe physical disabilities are often more likely to qualify for benefits due to the visible and debilitating nature of their conditions. However, even among this group, those with more moderate disabilities may face challenges.
Although some may qualify for continued support, others with less severe conditions might see their benefits reduced or reassessed.
PIP could be harder to claim if there are changes in how the “daily living” and “mobility” criteria are applied. People with lower levels of physical disability, but still with significant impairments, may lose vital support.
4. Learning Disabilities and Autism
People with learning disabilities and autism may face the challenge of being misunderstood or misjudged by the assessment system.
Eligibility tightening could result in individuals with learning disabilities who need support to live independently being disqualified.
The assessment process often does not fully account for the nuances of developmental conditions, potentially leaving many ineligible or underfunded.
People with autism, especially those who are able to work part-time or have mild symptoms, may face challenges in proving their need for support.
5. Older Adults and Age-Related Conditions
Older adults suffering from age-related health issues like dementia or osteoarthritis may find themselves needing benefits but facing a more restrictive assessment process.
People with dementia or cognitive impairments might struggle with the increased frequency of reassessments, which could cause confusion or anxiety, worsening their health.
Eligibility could also be affected for those whose conditions are progressive but not necessarily severe enough to meet the criteria for full support.
6. Invisible Conditions (e.g., Fatigue Syndromes, Chronic Illnesses)
Those with invisible conditions like Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS) or irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) often face difficulty in proving their conditions through standard assessments.
People with these conditions may face more scrutiny due to the nature of their symptoms being harder to detect in a medical exam.
More frequent reassessments and tighter eligibility criteria may force individuals into situations where their health deteriorates as they are pushed to participate in assessments or work when they are not ready.
Overall Concerns for All Groups:
Financial Hardship: With many disabled individuals being pushed into poverty or financial uncertainty, there could be negative long-term health consequences as people are forced to choose between working and managing their health.
Impact on Employment: The push to get people into employment could work for some, but for others, especially those with fluctuating or invisible conditions, this could mean more pressure, more stress, and worsening health.
Support Systems: These reforms might undermine support systems, particularly for people who need tailored interventions, as the one-size-fits-all approach to reassessments and eligibility doesn’t always take into account individual circumstances.
In conclusion, the changes could disproportionately affect people with conditions that are harder to diagnose or that fluctuate over time. For example, someone with a mental health disorder or an invisible chronic illness may find it harder to prove the extent of their need for benefits, making the system harder to navigate. In contrast, people with visible and more stable conditions might be less affected by these reforms but still face increased pressure to work or undergo frequent assessments.
Advocacy groups and experts have raised concerns that these reforms might ultimately cause more harm than good, potentially exacerbating inequalities faced by disabled people in the UK.
Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
(but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:
Be among the first to know what’s going on! Here are the ways to manage it:
1) Register with us by clicking on ‘Subscribe’ (bottom right of the home page). You can then receive notifications of every new article that is posted here.
2) Follow VP on Twitter @VoxPolitical
3) Like the Facebook page at https://www.facebook.com/VoxPolitical/
Join the Vox Political Facebook page.
4) You could even make Vox Political your homepage at http://voxpoliticalonline.com
5) Follow Vox Political writer Mike Sivier on BlueSky
6) Join the MeWe page at https://mewe.com/p-front/voxpolitical
7) Feel free to comment!
And do share with your family and friends – so they don’t miss out!
If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!
Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.
Cruel Britannia is available
in either print or eBook format here:
The Livingstone Presumption is available
in either print or eBook format here:
Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:
The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:
you might also like
Let’s start the New Year with some hopeful news
More mistakes in the script? Correcting Cameron’s New Year speech
Osborne wants a ‘year of hard truths’. Here’s one: He’s HIDING the truth