Share this post:
Keir Starmer says the UK will recognise the State of Palestine — but only in September, and only if Israel meets a list of conditions.
There’s just one problem: Labour’s own 2024 manifesto says otherwise.
Thanks to a sharp-eyed Vox Political reader, we’re reminded that page 124 of the Labour Party’s most recent manifesto says this:
“Palestinian statehood is the inalienable right of the Palestinian people. It is not in the gift of any neighbour.”
The manifesto continues:
“We are committed to recognising a Palestinian state as a contribution to a renewed peace process…”
Let’s break that down:
-
“Inalienable right” means not conditional.
-
“Not in the gift of any neighbour” means Israel doesn’t get a veto.
-
“Committed to recognising” is a promise — not a threat based on a ceasefire.
And yet, Starmer and Foreign Secretary David Lammy are now saying that recognition will only happen if Israel meets a list of preconditions — including halting its destruction of Gaza and recommitting to a two-state solution, something Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu has already rejected outright.
So which is it, Prime Minister?
Is Palestinian statehood an “inalienable right” — or a diplomatic bargaining chip?
Labour told voters in 2024 it would recognise Palestine as a matter of principle.
Now it’s treating recognition as a stick to wave at Israel, then quietly withdraw if Netanyahu plays nice.
That’s not just cowardly – it’s a direct betrayal of Labour’s own words — and of the people who voted for that party.
This is what happens when leadership ignores policy
Starmer didn’t write the 2024 manifesto in a vacuum.
It was the product of months of internal debate and negotiation — and it reflected the view of a party trying to reclaim credibility on the world stage.
Now, just over a year later, that policy is being openly contradicted by a prime minister who thinks statehood is something Palestinians must earn through Israeli compliance.
It’s a disgrace — and Labour members and voters have every right to demand accountability.
Meanwhile, in Gaza…
An Israeli thug shot and killed an 11-year-old boy who had walked 12km to the ‘Aid Trap’ – controlled by Israeli and US forces – in search of food for his mother and brothers. The boy had received a package of aid and had been walking home peacefully.
So much for the so-called ceasefire.
Share this post:
Starmer’s conditions for recognising Palestine directly contradict his own manifesto
Share this post:
Keir Starmer says the UK will recognise the State of Palestine — but only in September, and only if Israel meets a list of conditions.
There’s just one problem: Labour’s own 2024 manifesto says otherwise.
Thanks to a sharp-eyed Vox Political reader, we’re reminded that page 124 of the Labour Party’s most recent manifesto says this:
The manifesto continues:
Let’s break that down:
“Inalienable right” means not conditional.
“Not in the gift of any neighbour” means Israel doesn’t get a veto.
“Committed to recognising” is a promise — not a threat based on a ceasefire.
And yet, Starmer and Foreign Secretary David Lammy are now saying that recognition will only happen if Israel meets a list of preconditions — including halting its destruction of Gaza and recommitting to a two-state solution, something Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu has already rejected outright.
So which is it, Prime Minister?
Is Palestinian statehood an “inalienable right” — or a diplomatic bargaining chip?
Labour told voters in 2024 it would recognise Palestine as a matter of principle.
Now it’s treating recognition as a stick to wave at Israel, then quietly withdraw if Netanyahu plays nice.
That’s not just cowardly – it’s a direct betrayal of Labour’s own words — and of the people who voted for that party.
This is what happens when leadership ignores policy
Starmer didn’t write the 2024 manifesto in a vacuum.
It was the product of months of internal debate and negotiation — and it reflected the view of a party trying to reclaim credibility on the world stage.
Now, just over a year later, that policy is being openly contradicted by a prime minister who thinks statehood is something Palestinians must earn through Israeli compliance.
It’s a disgrace — and Labour members and voters have every right to demand accountability.
Meanwhile, in Gaza…
An Israeli thug shot and killed an 11-year-old boy who had walked 12km to the ‘Aid Trap’ – controlled by Israeli and US forces – in search of food for his mother and brothers. The boy had received a package of aid and had been walking home peacefully.
So much for the so-called ceasefire.
Share this post:
you might also like
If British organisations worked with the Israeli embassy to achieve that country’s aims and not our own, what should we call it?
Here’s why people are afraid to denounce the genocidal brutality of the Israeli regime
Israeli prime minister demands support for racist apartheid law