Lords committee: no compelling case for scaling back BBC. Tories will try anyway
Well done to the Lords for using evidence to support their case that the BBC doesn’t require significant change.
There’s just one problem: The Conservative Government isn’t interested in evidence.
The Conservative Government is interested in making profits for its friends in independent broadcasting.
So you can expect plans to scale down the BBC when the Tories publish their white paper in the spring.
The Lords’ report gets it exactly right, in the view of This Writer. The only change they have advocated is the introduction of a separate regulator to end the corruption in the BBC’s complaint handling.
For those of us who have fallen foul of the Corporation in this respect, it would be a huge step forward.
It might even go some way towards addressing the shameful bias in favour of the Conservatives that the BBC now blatantly displays.
A cross-party group of peers has told the government that there is “no compelling case” for scaling back the BBC and it should continue to be a “universal broadcaster” making popular programming for all.
In one of the most robust defences of the BBC’s output yet, the Lords communications committee said there should be an overhaul of how the corporation is held to account but there is “no need for fundamental changes to the BBC’s core mission”.
The BBC’s critics have argued that it should not compete with commercial rivals in areas such as news and entertainment and should restrict itself to filling gaps in programming left by the market.
A government green paper on BBC charter renewal last summer included questions about whether the BBC’s scale and scope should be reduced, and a white paper setting out the government’s recommendations is due for publication this spring.
However, committee chair Lord Best said those who had provided evidence for the report thought the BBC was doing a “pretty good job”.
“[The BBC] should be held accountable, there should be a regulator to do that, but we don’t want a revolution, we don’t think there should be any big changes. We don’t think the size, the scale and scope of the BBC should be cut down, that’s not on our agenda.”
Source: Lords committee: no compelling case for scaling back BBC | Media | The Guardian
Join the Vox Political Facebook page.
If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!
Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
(but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:
Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.
Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:
The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:
Let’s not forget that the BBC has effectively been scaled down already by the Government making it the financial responsibility of the BBC to finance the free tv license for the over seventy fives. This previously came out of the budget of the DWP, and is a considerable chunk of money to be found by the BBC and has already caused cuts to programming ( BBC3) is the most obvious casualty of this.
It must certainly not be sold off to their friends like so many other National assets and it certainly needs to be supervised to make certain that it is unbiased.