Brierfield in Lancashire where nearly 35% of children live in poverty and just over 50% are classed as poor according to reach by the End Child Poverty Campaign.

Brierfield in Lancashire where nearly 35% of children live in poverty and just over 50% are classed as poor according to reach by the End Child Poverty Campaign.

First up is the disgraceful proposal to limit most tax credits and Universal Credit to the first two children in any family.

The ways in which the Conservatives justify this policy seems to imply that poorer families have lots of kids that their hard working counterparts could not afford. The reality, however, is that the latter make up almost two thirds of those currently entitled to these credits.

Moreover, statistics show low income families are no more likely to have large families than the rich in our country. And of course, if people only had children where they knew at the point of conception that they could support them for the next 18 years, who would ever do it? The best laid plans can be knocked aside by illness, bereavement or redundancy.

The only exemptions Ministers are allowing to the proposals are for multiple births, as well as cases of rape. Although to date, they have not been forthcoming on how a woman is meant to prove to the DWP that her pregnancy is as a result of such an attack. It really doesn’t bear thinking about. But what also about those fleeing domestic violence?

What, too, about third children already alive and kicking who won’t be covered in some brand new Universal Credit claims? And then there are all of the unintended consequences, for example deterring the formation of stepfamilies or putting off kinship carers and adopters.

This is a vicious policy that will increase child poverty – the second issue taking up much of the opening day of Committee, and something that is already 35% higher in larger families.

Its real victims will be those kids who didn’t choose to be born as younger siblings into larger families but whose life chances will damaged because the Conservatives want to punish their parents.

And if parents stop having children, who is going to pay our pensions when we need them? Whose taxes will fund our NHS and social care in our ageing society?

With approximately 3.7 million children living in poverty in the UK, it is shocking to find that hidden in the detail of the Bill is an attempt by the government to effectively repeal the 2010 Child Poverty Act introduced by Labour.

In particular, they want to remove the duty on Ministers to set targets and draft strategies, and erase any mention of poverty.

Instead, they want to re-brand the legislation, the policy area, and even the Social Mobility Commission to include the shiny new title of ‘life chances’.

Read more: Unintended consequences? – Labour Lords

Join the Vox Political Facebook page.

If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!

Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
(
but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:

Donate Button with Credit Cards

Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.

Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:

SWAHTprint SWAHTeBook