‘Abolition of the Bedroom Tax’ Bill is launched in Parliament

Ian Lavery launched his ambitious Bill to abolish the Bedroom Tax yesterday. [Image: Daily Mirror]

Ian Lavery launched his ambitious Bill to abolish the Bedroom Tax yesterday. [Image: Daily Mirror]

Make no mistake about it – the purpose of the legislation tabled yesterday (Wednesday) by Labour’s Ian Lavery is to discover how many Liberal Democrat MPs are redeemable and how many have been irreversibly corrupted by their current alliance with the Conservatives.

The Bill to abolish the hated Bedroom Tax is unlikely to gain Royal Assent unless Liberal Democrats who supported the imposition of the Bedroom Tax reverse their point of view. There is even the possibility that some Conservatives may now realise that they, as Mr Lavery put it, “underestimated the real consequences of walking through the Government Lobby to support the introduction”. He also said: “It is an olive branch… I would hope that my Bill would receive support from members in all parties.”

MPs voted almost unanimously for the Bill to be brought in, with 226 votes in favour and only one against – but readers of this blog will be familiar with the fact that this happened with Michael Meacher’s motion for a commission of inquiry into the impact of social security changes on poverty. The House approved; the government did nothing.

So don’t get your hopes up too high.

Mr Lavery was the only person to speak on the subject, and his words are well worth noting here.

“The full and sole intention of this Bill is to sweep away the dreaded bedroom tax,” he said.

“It seeks to restore justice for up to 660,000 people — some of our country’s most vulnerable citizens, two-thirds of whom are disabled. They have been inhumanely let down by the Government’s reforms to housing benefit in the social sector. The tax has caused heartache and devastation to thousands of residents up and down this country. It is a tax whose forced implementation has put extreme pressure on councils, housing associations and social landlords. It is a tax that has put extreme pressure on the ordinary working people who are forced to deal with those unable to move and those unable to pay.

“On the introduction of the tax, Ministers argued that the changes would encourage people to downsize to smaller properties and, in doing so, help to cut the £23 billion annual bill for housing benefit; would free up living space for overcrowded families; and would encourage people to get jobs. Significantly, it has achieved none of those objectives.

“At the same time, the Department for Work and Pensions has trumpeted the measure as ‘returning fairness to housing benefit’. The words ‘fairness’ and ‘bedroom tax’ should not be uttered in the same sentence.”

He said: “This tax is a problem in each and every constituency up and down the country; this is not simply a problem in Labour-dominated authorities. I was contacted only last week by a distraught resident from the Tory shires who is hoping that my Bill will be successful, because he, a disabled man, is living in a three-bedroom property and has just received an eviction notice for bedroom tax arrears. He is not alone. The bedroom tax sufferers in Liberal Democrat and Tory constituencies number around 250,000. Perhaps we should ask them whether they think this abominable tax has restored fairness to housing benefit.”

Mr Lavery said his Bill seeks “to restore fairness and to end the misery that the bedroom tax has caused”. He said there are hundreds, if not thousands, of “appalling” examples of suffering, mentioning (but not naming) mother-of-two Stephanie Bottrill, a woman suffering a crippling illness who committed suicide after realising that she could not pay the bedroom tax. Her family received correspondence later saying that she should have been exempt from the charge.

He also mentioned a case he said was “hard to comprehend; it really is difficult to try to get to grips with”. He said: “The family of the 1999 child of courage, who spent years battling multiple cancers, is suffering at the hands of this horrible reform. These people are not living a life of luxury in palatial properties; they are living in a place in which they feel safe and which they call home. It is time to listen. I am sure that most fair-minded individuals would agree that a bedroom is not spare when carers sleep in it, when couples use it because one of them has health problems and they cannot share a bed, or when it houses vital medical equipment, yet this indiscriminate tax deems it so.

“The reality is that yet another measure introduced by this Government is in total and utter chaos. It lies in tatters, with the victims left to pick up the pieces. As thousands suffer, there is a real risk that the bedroom tax will end up costing more than it saves. The National Housing Federation has said that the savings claimed by the Government are ‘highly questionable’, partly because those who are forced to move to the private rented sector will end up costing more in housing benefit.

“Surely, as politicians and members of the general public, we are entitled to question the motives behind the introduction of the bedroom tax. The tax does not deal with the problem of under-occupation. In fact, the Government’s costings on the yield raised from the bedroom tax explicitly assume that people will not move into smaller properties. There are simply not enough smaller properties for people to move into.

“Some 180,000 households were deemed to be under-occupying two-bedroom homes, yet only 85,000 one-bedroom homes became available during the whole of 2012. The savings projections of the Department for Work and Pensions assume that not one of the 660,000 households affected would respond to the policy by moving to a smaller home. Put simply, this is yet another example of the Government balancing the books on the backs of the disabled and the vulnerable. The tax must be scrapped now.

“Housing associations say that tens of millions of pounds are likely to be lost through the build-up of arrears. Reports this morning estimate that 144,000 people have fallen behind with their rents since the introduction of the bedroom tax and that 14 per cent have received eviction notices [20,160].

“Was that really meant to happen? Was this eviction of the poor really the plan of the Government?

“In October, research by the University of York, which was based on data by the housing associations that have tenants affected by the bedroom tax, suggested that the policy could save up to 39 per cent less than the DWP had predicted. In the past week, it has emerged that more than half of the £500 million that the Government claim will be saved by the hated tax will be spent on re-housing disabled people. These are vulnerable people who already live in properties that have been adapted for their needs and who have built up local support networks with their friends, family and neighbours. The future for them lies in communities that are unknown and foreign to them. They have been cast out like the proverbial dog in the night.”

Interrupted when he mentioned the loophole that exempted Stephanie Bottrill from paying the bedroom tax – another member said that the loophole had been closed – Mr Lavery continued: “As Ministers scramble to mop up the mistakes, another challenge to the hated tax has arisen. A judge has overturned the tax in the case of a Rochdale man who argued that one of his bedrooms was used as a dining room. The appeal was upheld on the basis that the dictionary definition of a bedroom is a room that contains a bed that is used for sleeping in. An avalanche of appeals is on its way.

“I am proud to see that, only last week, the Scottish Labour party shamed the Scottish National party into abolishing the bedroom tax. I must put it on the record that I am also proud that one of the first acts of a future Labour Government will be to end this full frontal attack on the vulnerable. However, we cannot afford to wait until the general election of 2015. I urge the supporters of this tax to think again.

“The question is this: Are they happy to see the misery and social disruption of the vulnerable and disabled? I began this speech by expressing the view that those who voted in favour of introducing this dreaded bedroom tax may have underestimated the human suffering that it would cause. That is no longer in any doubt, so I urge them all to do the honourable thing and support my Bill.”

That really is the question for members of the public to consider, along with MPs. If your MP votes against Mr Lavery’s Bill, then you will know that they are, indeed, happy to inflict misery and disruption on the vulnerable and disabled.

Do you want to live in a country where people like that are allowed to rule?

Make no mistake: This legislation is unlikely to succeed without support from people who previously helped bring the Bedroom Tax into law. As such, it might not work.

But this is also legislation that should help you decide how you will vote in May next year.

We can hope that our MPs – and you yourself, dear reader – choose wisely.

The Bill will have its second reading on February 28.

 Labour’s Chris Bryant took the opportunity afforded by Mr Lavery’s motion to bring a point of order – that Iain Duncan Smith, Esther McVey and Lord Freud had been using false statistics. He said: “Earlier this year, when asked how many people had been affected by the loophole in the bedroom tax legislation, the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions… said that the number was between 3,000 and 5,000. In a written answer, the Minister of State… (Esther McVey)… said that she did not know how many had been affected. Lord Freud, a Minister in another place, said that it was an insignificant number. Today, however, he told the Work and Pensions Committee of this House that the number was 5,000.

“We have been doing their work for them, and from Freedom of Information requests to local authorities in England, Wales and Scotland, we already know, from just the third that replied, of 16,000 cases.”

Debbie Abrahams, a member of the Work and Pensions committee to whom Lord Freud provided the false figure, said committee members will be pursuing the matter.

Follow me on Twitter: @MidWalesMike

Join the Vox Political Facebook page.

Vox Political supports any move to end the unjust Bedroom Tax.
But we need support as well.
That’s why Vox Political needs YOUR help to continue.
You can make a one-off donation here:

Donate Button with Credit Cards

Alternatively, you can buy the first Vox Political book,
Strong Words and Hard Times
in either print or eBook format here:

SWAHTprint SWAHTeBook

29 thoughts on “‘Abolition of the Bedroom Tax’ Bill is launched in Parliament

  1. Pingback: 'Abolition of the Bedroom Tax' Bill is launched...

  2. Thomas M

    Roll on Labour, at least then that unfair tax that only targets the poor can hopefully be abolished.

    1. Mike Sivier

      Nothing was said about that and my gut feeling is that there won’t be rebates. It’s an attempt to get rid of a bad thing; I don’t think it’s possible to wash away what it has already done.

  3. Angie Harding

    I would love my MP to stand up for what’s right and abolish the bedroom tax BUT my so-called Labour MP is also a big landlord in Leicester, he and his wife, and I have seen some of the rents he wants for some of his properties so I don’t think he will be voting out.

  4. simonkirk

    Reblogged this on simonkirkfineart and commented:
    Make no mistake about it – the purpose of the legislation tabled yesterday (Wednesday) by Labour’s Ian Lavery is to discover how many Liberal Democrat MPs are redeemable and how many have been irreversibly corrupted by their current alliance with the Conservatives.

  5. Pingback: ‘Abolition of the Bedroom Tax’ Bill is launched in Parliament | Street Democracy - where it should reach

  6. Nigel Wootton

    To bin the bedroom tax before May 2015 depends on the fib-dems changing their approval to voting against the tax, when Ian Lavery’s bill to abolish it gets a second reading in Parliament. Given the fib-dem’s record of persistently propping up the ConDem government, I suppose we cannot count on much from those spineless unprincipled traitors to the British public.

  7. amnesiaclinic

    An excellent blog, Mike. Let’s hope we do get success on 28th Feb. I shall use this for my letter and appeal to my tory MP. I think he abstained. Email, plus,handwritten letter, possible visit and phone call!!
    We can do this!!!!
    x

  8. Debbie pilkington

    What about private tenants who can’t afford bedroom tax? My hubbies disabled and had all the adaptations done to this house, so dont really want to move, but will have to because my daughter moved out, and we can’t afford to pay the bedroom tax and the extra rent we have to pay because of it. Its not fair only abolishing it for social and councils. Abolish it all as privately rented housing is A LOT more expensive than other rents.

    1. jaypot2012

      I agree Debbie, and I’m also very sorry for your plight.
      Hubby and myself live in a private rented 2 bed bungalow but only get HB for one bedroom instead of the 2 – we are both disabled, need our own rooms because we cannot sleep in the same room, but are penalised for it. That extra £30 per week that we should get would make a hell of a difference to the we have to find to make up the rent.
      Private renting is expensive!

  9. James Mee

    Ian Lavery is my Mp and in my this area there is a healthy contingent of Conservatives, hmm even landed myself in the local paper recently because of some strong comments I made against their policies recently lol~

    Ian will need back up. The people he is up against are some of the most hard headed, hard hearted, ignorant buffoons you could ever possibly come across. In fact they make vipers look like puppies. That said the chances of success are small, and of failure high, but that should not act as a deterrent.

    As for the bedroom tax it is an anathema, rather like taxing the spare tyre on all those who have cars.

  10. jaypot2012

    I’m all for this bedroom tax being abolished right now! It has cost more than it has saved, it has caused pain, suffering and such stress to people and families. Evictions are up, rent arrears are up and all because IDS and Co. found another way to make the poor suffer.
    I do however have one point that I’d like to comment on – Ian Lavery said, “I am proud to see that, only last week, the Scottish Labour party shamed the Scottish National party into abolishing the bedroom tax.” – erm no! This was an SNP decision and they asked for backing and Labour stood with them. But then again, he is a politician!

    1. Mike Sivier

      I’m not getting into the debate about Scottish Labour and the SNP! I saw it in the speech and considered highlighting it, but then thought it was counterproductive. The main thing is that there is no bedroom tax in Scotland.

  11. frank mcdonnell

    today a top banking boss takes a 1.7 million bonus as the poor sick and disabled are hit with the bedroom tax. but we are all in this together says cameron.

  12. Mark Potter-Irwin

    Excellent article and good for Ian Lavery, but I have to point out that “I am proud to see that, only last week, the Scottish Labour party shamed the Scottish National party into abolishing the bedroom tax.” is a bit rich when so many Scottish Labour MPs supported or abstained in a recent Westminster vote on the bedroom tax. The Scottish government had already pledged to abolish the bedroom tax. The good thing is that the Labour amendment to the Scottish budget meant that Scotland can alleviate the suffering caused by this tax An example of cooperation I think not “shame”

  13. Claire

    I work part time. I need that little bit of housing benefit to help me now I pay 40 pound a month on top of my rent council tax I can’t afford to pay some of my other bills. Iv lived in my 2 bedroom flat for 16 years. It is not my fault I have a spare room. And there is no 1 bedroom flats to down size too. Please get rid of the bedroom tax

Comments are closed.