Journalists’ outrage at Canary editor’s speech invitation boosts ‘Boycott the Guardian’ campaign
This is a story about treacherous people getting their just desserts.
The editor-in-chief of The Canary – This Site’s friend Kerry-Anne Mendoza – has been honoured with an invitation to give the Claudia Jones Memorial Lecture, as part of the series held in memory of the pioneering black female journalist.
The lecture is organised by the National Union of Journalists’ Black Members Council and the choice of speaker is nothing to do with the Guardian-Observer chapel (that’s their word for a branch) of the NUJ – but it seems these reporters complained bitterly at the choice of speaker:
https://twitter.com/MarkDiStef/status/1045023451390636034
The release of Mark Di Stefano’s tweet (above) prompted something of a backlash. The fact that white journalists at the Guardian were seeking to vote that one of UK media’s only black/minority ethnic editors-in-chief be stopped from giving the Claudia Jones Memorial Lecture for Black History Month was considered by many to be a sign of The Guardian officially losing the plot.
Kerry-Anne herself said: “I’m a proud member of the National Union of Journalists and honoured to be invited to give the Claudia Jones Memorial Lecture this year.
“It’s a sign of the entitlement of our establishment journalists that they would behave so poorly in response.
“I think we’ve reached peak Guardian. A group of mostly white, middle class journalists trying to stop one of Britain’s only working class, BAME editors in chief from giving a speech for Black History Month.”
Followers of the social media agreed – and it just happened to be the case that a Twitterstorm in support of the hashtag #BoycottTheGuardian had been arranged, to take place between 7pm and 9pm on September 27. You can understand why Kerry-Anne called for us all to support it:
https://twitter.com/TheMendozaWoman/status/1045381252059197440
It trended at number one.
https://twitter.com/TheMendozaWoman/status/1045393068806017024
Dear @guardian,
Right-wingers don't read you.
So when there are so many people on the Left saying #BoycottTheGuardian that it's trending, who exactly are supposed to be your target readers?
Your best friends and relatives?
Regards,
Tom— Tom Pride (@ThomasPride) September 27, 2018
Looks like #BoycottTheGuardian going to trend at number 1. I must admit I enjoy it at times but it’s politics coverage is abysmal and it seems increasingly irrelevant. Which is sad – Britain needs progressive media now more than ever. The long reads, in particular, are brilliant.
— Aaron Bastani (@AaronBastani) September 27, 2018
#BoycottTheGuardian Because it is a neo-con rag that deliberately promotes false left identity politics to undermine horizontal solidarity between the exploited ordinary people.
— Craig Murray (@CraigMurrayOrg) September 27, 2018
Kerry-Anne herself received a lot of support:
#BoycottTheGuardian because it's unacceptable that they think they can decide who is or isn't a journalist.
Solidarity with @TheMendozaWoman and all independent journalists.#ChangeTheMedia
— Alex Tiffin (@RespectIsVital) September 27, 2018
.@TheMendozaWoman is a worthy choice to deliver the Claudia Jones memorial lecture.
She's an antidote to the msm output. Remember Malcolm X said "If you're not careful the newspapers will have you hating the people being oppressed and loving the people doing the oppressing" https://t.co/FoZNGLy5Oa— Chris Williamson (@DerbyChrisW) September 27, 2018
But The Guardian‘s change of editorial policy to one that undermines the Labour Party and its leader was also targeted:
Nobody has done more damage to Labour and Jeremy Corbyn than the Guardian and its rancid columnists.
— Nadeem Ahmed (@Muqadaam) September 27, 2018
Corbyn linked to anti-semitism 100+ times in The Guardian. Their quinoa-munching journalists would call this an example of 'Agenda Setting Function Theory.' The rest of us would call it propaganda. #BoycottTheGuardian
— JamieⓋ⛥🏴 (@Jimmy_Lacey) September 27, 2018
In fact, this had been the intention behind the Twitterstorm – and it would have received much less attention if the Guardian-Observer NUJ chapel’s members had just kept their mouths shut (or their typing fingers away from whatever messaging system they have been using).
The result of all this activism is not yet known. The NUJ itself has said nothing on the subject.
It is possible that the Establishment will try to hush up the fact that there has been a huge protest against what can be seen as a clear example of racism by mostly white, middle-class university-graduate journalists.
If that happens, we’ll just have to run another campaign – bigger, louder, and impossible to ignore. Repression always incites rebellion.
Visit our JustGiving page to help Vox Political’s Mike Sivier fight anti-Semitism libels in court
Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
(but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:
Here are four ways to be sure you’re among the first to know what’s going on.
1) Register with us by clicking on ‘Subscribe’ (in the left margin). You can then receive notifications of every new article that is posted here.
2) Follow VP on Twitter @VoxPolitical
3) Like the Facebook page at https://www.facebook.com/VoxPolitical/
Join the Vox Political Facebook page.
4) You could even make Vox Political your homepage at http://voxpoliticalonline.com
And do share with your family and friends – so they don’t miss out!
If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!
Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.
The Livingstone Presumption is now available
in either print or eBook format here:
Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:
The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:
Boycott the Guardian predates the Mendoza fiasco, but adds to it. Original boycott based upon Guardian’s repeated misrepresentation of Corbyn, from what I can see.
Report launched this week shows that The Guardian has been more hostile and one-sided about Jeremy Corbyn than any other newspaper except the Daily Mail/Heil ~ up there with BBC News ~ and worse than the S*n. http://www.mediareform.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Labour-antisemitism-and-the-news-FINAL-PROOFED.pdf
At last the beetles are being flushed out of the woodwork and are finding that there few possibilities for them to hide. More seriously they are in danger of putting the Guardian at risk of going out of business. Biting the hand that feeds them.
Help!! I stopped buying the Guardian two years ago for these sort of reasons ie the clear anti-socialist bias of most of its writers. So now I can’t boycott it anymore! Not that I needed it the way I did for over 30 years (I first bought it in 1969) Once, it seemed the only voice of sanity in a world of establishment propaganda but now it seems to have joined the other side. Because we finally have a Labour Party that intends to really change the balance of power.
Now I get my news online, from sites such as the Canary and this site. We don’t need the Guardian any more. The Right never did. But, now they have abandoned their Left-wing readership, what is the point of Guardian writers?