A bid to backstab Shadow Chancellor John McDonnell backfired in the faces of Lisa Nandy and Wes Streeting after all three appeared on Robert Peston’s ITV chat show yesterday (February 27).
Ms Nandy and Mr Streeting were keen to suggest their own party had failed to act appropriately in the early days of anti-Semitism accusation against members, citing the case of their colleague Naz Shah as an example.
But Mr McDonnell contradicted them, saying he had intimate knowledge of that matter as Ms Shah was his Personal Private Secretary (PPS) at the time.
Here’s part of the discussion – and note how Peston describes it:
Labour’s @wesstreeting and @lisanandy tell @johnmcdonnellMP that he is not telling the truth on how previous cases of antisemitism were dealt with within the Labour Party.
Full interview 11.10pm @ITV #Peston pic.twitter.com/kZHFHW49L9
— Peston (@itvpeston) February 27, 2019
The impression you are intended to get is that Mr McDonnell was in the wrong. But he was right.
James Mills is a former director of communications for Mr McDonnell and the Shadow Treasury Team (STT). He tweeted his recollection of events to put the record straight:
There was only 3 of us in the room at this stage, I was asked for my opinion on the matter and I gave my honest opinion, which was that I wouldn't defend it & she had to go. There was not any difference of opinion from anyone. Naz was asked to come in and JC with JM informed her.
— James Mills (@JamesMills1984) February 28, 2019
Isn’t it interesting that we can see the same pattern here as faced Diane Abbott on the BBC’s Question Time a few weeks ago, when she rightly said that Labour was doing well in the opinion polls but other panellists – and even host Fiona Bruce – ganged up on her and gaslighted her with false claims that she was mistaken?
We can learn several things from this:
Firstly, the backstabbers in the Parliamentary Labour Party are now lining up to make their treacherous intentions known to the general public. Wes Streeting was already on my list; now we can add Lisa Nandy (unless she wants to plead stupidity; this is doubtful as she argued with Mr Mills on Twitter, pushing a claim that he was wrong). They probably thought they could get away with this story because the sequence of events was not reported when Ms Shah was accused in 2016. More fool them.
Secondly, we should also be making a list of mainstream news reporters who can’t be trusted to report events fairly and accurately. Again, I have to say that Robert Peston was already on my own list.
Finally, the reason this was being discussed is a claim by Ms Nandy and Mr Streeting that nothing has changed in the nearly three years since Ms Shah was accused. Their story was that the Labour leadership had to be challenged before any action was taken – as it was in the case of Chris Williamson yesterday.
But Chris Williamson’s case is different from that of Naz Shah. Ms Shah admitted that she had made a series of Twitter posts with anti-Semitic intent as a reaction to the deaths of many Palestinians during “Operation Protective Edge” in 2014, after the tweets were brought to light by the Guido Fawkes blog two years later. In contrast, Mr Williamson has made it abundantly clear that he opposes anti-Semitism; his statement that Labour has been “too apologetic” over accusations arose from a desire to support innocent party members who have been wrongly accused.
And that is the heart of the matter. For some reason, some MPs and officers of the Labour Party are desperate to hide the fact that party members – and former party members, like myself, who have been wrongly expelled – have been treated unfairly.
That is why they keep telling these tall stories.
It is also why they keep coming unstuck. Please draw your own conclusions regarding what this means about Chris Williamson, Jeremy Corbyn and Labour’s “anti-Semitism” row.
Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
(but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:
Here are four ways to be sure you’re among the first to know what’s going on.
1) Register with us by clicking on ‘Subscribe’ (in the left margin). You can then receive notifications of every new article that is posted here.
2) Follow VP on Twitter @VoxPolitical
3) Like the Facebook page at https://www.facebook.com/VoxPolitical/
Join the Vox Political Facebook page.
4) You could even make Vox Political your homepage at http://voxpoliticalonline.com
And do share with your family and friends – so they don’t miss out!
If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!
Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.
The Livingstone Presumption is now available
in either print or eBook format here:
Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:
The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:
Chris Williamson, Jeremy Corbyn and Labour’s “anti-Semitism” row. there isn’t any has we now the greedie ones the blairites of this party while they tell fibs they ridding the party of the decent mps while they one by one knock them off making it easier for their rise back isn’t it strange cobyn has the leader grabs this bull between its horns getting rid of these blairites once and for all don’t come back stating the local party has to deselect them and whip taken away whot about a tv appearance with those who support him telling it how it is perhaps stemming their lies has this needs to stop now otherwise labour if finished
What i also found astonishing was that Robert Peston even asked McDonnell would Labour consider taking back the defective Labour MPs that left…why would Labour ever take back those treacherous lot
Naz Shah’s posts were also taken out of context, particularly the meme of a quotation from Dr. Martin £uther King Jr.’s letter from a Birmingham jail, which, ultimately, saw Ken £ivingstone leave the Party. They way that the truth was twisted was utterly disgusting.
My understanding of Mr. Williamson’s comments was also to highlight the good work that £abour had done and to dispel the idea that it is a Party of racists.