There is only one reason Tory policies kill the sick and disabled (and they do): THEY LIKE IT

Imagine there’s a pit full of bodies beneath the falling wheelchair-user, totalling at least 120,000 people [Image: Black Triangle Campaign].

Here’s a great Twitter thread from Rachael Swindon, listing only some of the vile treatment endured by sick and disabled people at the will of the Conservative government led by Theresa May (and formerly David Cameron).

It isn’t entirely accurate, of course. Nobody in their right mind thinks MS or Parkinson’s Disease is curable; it’s just something that they said, to justify victimising the poor sufferers of those illnesses. What were these benefit claimants going to do? Take them to court? Impossible. They would have needed Legal Aid to do so and legal aid for this purpose has been banned by the Conservatives.

It’s the policy of the Nazi, but with an extra layer of pretence; the Nazis pretended that disabled people were “useless eaters” who were to expensive – too much a drain on the state – to be allowed to live, while the Conservatives pretend that people with illnesses and disabilities are not ill at all, before going on to say that they do not merit the expense borne by the state in paying benefits to them.

The gas chambers (the Nazis piloted them on disabled people before proceeding to their better-known genocides) aren’t needed because experience shows that those who are very ill, deprived of the wherewithal to make their way in the world, either die of their own illnesses or take their own lives. It’s cheaper than gas.

But the whole process isn’t.

The expense of hiring private firms to deny medical evidence and steal their livelihood from the deserving poor, of holding tribunals at huge cost that end up ordering that the victims of this Tory persecution are paid everything they were owed… of a system of oppression that costs much, much more than simply paying benefits to the sick and disabled, can only mean one thing.

Conservatives like Iain Duncan Smith, Damian Green, David Gauke, Esther McVey, Chris Grayling, Maria Miller, and all the others who have been involved, directly or indirectly – right up to the one who resigned last week, whatever her name was – haven’t been victimising the sick and disabled to their deaths because they think it is an economic necessity.

They do it because they like to hurt people who cannot retaliate. That is all.


Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
(
but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:

Donate Button with Credit Cards

Here are four ways to be sure you’re among the first to know what’s going on.

1) Register with us by clicking on ‘Subscribe’ (in the left margin). You can then receive notifications of every new article that is posted here.

2) Follow VP on Twitter @VoxPolitical

3) Like the Facebook page at https://www.facebook.com/VoxPolitical/

Join the Vox Political Facebook page.

4) You could even make Vox Political your homepage at http://voxpoliticalonline.com

And do share with your family and friends – so they don’t miss out!

If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!

Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.


The Livingstone Presumption is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:

SWAHTprint SWAHTeBook

latest video

news via inbox

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

4 Comments

  1. Jeffrey Davies March 18, 2019 at 6:25 am - Reply

    Conservatives like Iain Duncan Smith, Damian Green, David Gauke, Esther McVey, Chris Grayling, Maria Miller, and all the others who have been involved, directly or indirectly – right up to the one who resigned last week, whatever her name was – haven’t been victimising the sick and disabled to their deaths because they think it is an economic necessity ah the only following orders brigade yet we have had numerous talk on it in the side rooms of the house of ill repute talk talk talk yet on it goes aktion t4 rolling along without much of a ado when will it end I ask but each year these devils hang onto power with the help of the greedie ones the blairites in the Labour Party begone begone but they still there open your eyes to this culling the stock through benefits denial jeff3

  2. nmac064 March 18, 2019 at 9:26 am - Reply

    Rachael gets it right every time.

  3. Michael McNulty March 18, 2019 at 12:06 pm - Reply

    I was asked on my PIP assessment if I had suicidal thoughts and I told them if I kill somebody else it won’t be me. Some years ago I got five years for manslaughter after being found not guilty of murder, and up until now they don’t take liberties with me because of unpredictable mental health. But they’re so greedy that one day they may sanction me, and cause me to respond in a way that will make the evening news.

    They took my “lifetime” DLA award and denied me PIP but it wasn’t enough to flip me, but at 58 years old a bed and regular meals on a life sentence is better than spending the rest of my life on the streets, destitute. It won’t be an innocent who pays, either.

    • Mike Sivier March 18, 2019 at 3:32 pm - Reply

      Steady. A threat to kill is also a crime, you know. And you won’t be able to say it’s due to mental ill-health if you’ve been contemplating it while compos mentis.

Leave A Comment