Tags

, , , , , , , , , , , ,

Jeremy Corbyn and Theresa May: He knew her previous offers of cross-party talks were false; under what conditions will he accept new talks now?

An extraordinarily lengthy cabinet meeting saw Conservatives spending seven hours hatching a plan to spend the next few weeks… finding a way to blame Labour for any continued deadlock.

That is the meaning behind the announcement that Theresa May will – at last – seek talks with Jeremy Corbyn on a way to break the “logjam”, as she has described the Parliamentary impasse over the manner in which the UK is to leave the European Union.

She has painted herself into a corner by agreeing a unilateral deal with the EU, based on the “red lines” regarding immigration and other matters that she imposed arbitrarily – and then failing to win support for it, even among members of her own party.

She had spurned offers of talks from Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn in the past. It seems clear that the only reason she is turning to him now is desperation – having put the entire country in an untenable position, she wants sham talks with Labour in order to set up the Opposition party as a scapegoat.

We already know she does not intend to vary or erase her “red lines”, which suggests a certain bad faith on her part before starting.

Politics academic Luke Cooper has said it should be easy to reach a deal, as the main difference between her plan and that of Mr Corbyn is semantic – they both want a customs union of some kind with the EU; they just call it different things.

But he tweeted that there is no support for it in the Conservative Party or among the cabinet that would have to pass the legislation that would make it possible.

This is borne out by the resignation of Nigel Adams as a Wales Office minister – exactly because he fears the UK would end up in a permanent customs union with the EU.

In addition, a Tory-Labour deal kills off the prospect of an early general election, which is Labour’s principal policy objective. Party members and voters would deplore what they would see as collusion with the Tories.

What’s more, Mrs May has said she won’t change the Withdrawal Agreement, so it’s only the Future Relationship declaration that is up for change, and those changes are not legally binding. Mrs May has said she’ll resign after getting this part of Brexit through Parliament and she’ll most likely be replaced by a Brexiteer who would not honour changes made to mollify Labour.

Mrs May has agreed to be bound by the decision of the House of Commons, and is demanding that Labour be bound by it too. But she can’t tie the hands of a future leader, and Jeremy Corbyn knows that.

Arch-remainer Andrew Adonis reckons the May offer is another trick:

It’s true that she wants a deal with Labour in order to make it possible for the UK to leave the EU on May 22 – without having to participate in EU elections. It does make another ultimatum possible – and she likes this kind of brinkwomanship, even though it hasn’t helped her at all.

Jim Pickard, political editor of the Financial Times, has said shadow cabinet members don’t believe Mrs May’s offer is genuine:

Other Labour MPs know the score too:

Even the Conservative government’s partners, the DUP, have expressed scepticism. Here’s that party’s statement:

“It remains to be seen if sub-contracting out the future of Brexit to Jeremy Corbyn, someone whom the Conservatives have demonised for four years, will end happily.” Indeed.

And the DUP is dead-set against any form of customs union because that party considers such an arrangement to be bringing the re-integration of Northern Ireland with the Republic of Ireland closer. That’s one reason Mrs May is having to reach out to Labour now.

Here’s National Union of Students vice-president Ali Milani:

Here’s tax justice campaigner Richard Murphy:

And the general public know the score too:

As a politician, Jeremy Corbyn’s course is clear. He cannot reject Mrs May’s offer outright, because that would certainly bring down the wrath of the Conservative-supporting mass media on him.

So he must take the initiative away from her. She is demanding talks with him on her terms, and her terms alone. That is not acceptable. Mr Corbyn needs to announce a few terms of his own.

If Mrs May cannot accept them, then responsibility for the mess she has made of Brexit remains on her shoulders – where it belongs.


Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
(
but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:

Donate Button with Credit Cards

Here are four ways to be sure you’re among the first to know what’s going on.

1) Register with us by clicking on ‘Subscribe’ (in the left margin). You can then receive notifications of every new article that is posted here.

2) Follow VP on Twitter @VoxPolitical

3) Like the Facebook page at https://www.facebook.com/VoxPolitical/

Join the Vox Political Facebook page.

4) You could even make Vox Political your homepage at http://voxpoliticalonline.com

And do share with your family and friends – so they don’t miss out!

If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!

Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.


The Livingstone Presumption is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:

SWAHTprint SWAHTeBook