Deluded, treacherous Keir Starmer thinks he can win elections after splitting the Labour Party

The only response Keir Starmer deserves: his treatment of Ken Loach is just one reason this nasty little creature and his cronies deserve our contempt.

This is one of the rare occasions when This Writer actually feels sympathy for Laura Bloody Kuenssberg.

The Bane of BBC News must have needed a disinfecting shower after Labour non-leader ‘Little Keir’ Starmer opened his mouth and ejaculated a stream of pure bullsh*t over her, as appears to have happened today (September 28).

She has faithfully transcribed the incident in a BBC report that we can analyse. Prepare to be sickened.

The headline reads: “Winning election more important than unity, says Sir Keir Starmer.” What an odd thing to say when no UK political party has ever won an election if the public perceived it to be divided.

In the text of the article he explained that he came into politics “to go into government to change millions of lives” – but that is clearly not going to happen. He has spent the whole of the Labour conference positioning himself as ‘Continuity Johnson’ – a ‘safe’ pair of hands for the Establishment (whoever that is) to hand the government, on the strict understanding that he won’t change anything at all.

He’ll never change millions of lives – unless he can find ways to make them even worse than the Tories have.

He said he didn’t come into politics to “lose and then tweet about it”.

Fair comment. After he lost at Chesham and Amersham, Starmer didn’t tweet about it, despite having tweeted regularly, up until polling day on June 17:

Afterwards – nothing. If you lose an election in Keir Starmer’s Labour, he won’t acknowledge your efforts or those of everybody who came to help you; it will be as though you never existed.

That’s the kind of leader he is: the kind whose only interest is his own image. The kind that nobody wants.

Kuenssberg’s article goes on to say that Starmer called on “every single Labour Party member and supporter” to have the same focus on the ballot box as he did.

In other words: your principles mean nothing – abandon them. All that matters is that Keir Starmer wins and takes power for himself.

I don’t think that’s a stance that Labour Party members will accept. Not those who joined to make the UK better, at least. His privileged, parachuted-in, right-wing cronies will be all for it, of course.

But most Labour members do have principles. They joined because they thought the party stood for something.

Over the 18 months of his non-leadership, Starmer has stripped away Labour’s policies until there was nothing left. He then spent the last few days at conference offering a new set of policies that were either dismissible as outright lies or unacceptable to anybody who holds the ideals for which Labour was originally formed.

Explaining his thinking, Starmer said: “Two years ago we were here in Brighton at Labour party conference and within a few short months we’d crashed to the worst general election results since 1935. I am not prepared to let that happen and if that means tough decisions to change our party, which is what I did on Sunday, I am going to take those tough decisions.”

How disingenuous. Starmer knows that Labour lost in 2019 because right-wing factionalists within the party had spent the previous two years undermining previous leader Jeremy Corbyn, in terror at how close the UK had come to having a transformative, socialist Labour government in 2017.

Starmer himself spent the early part of his term as leader protecting those people from scrutiny and presenting the most feeble excuses possible for doing so (think of the lawsuit brought by the former party officers who took part in the BBC’s Panorama non-documentary, Is Labour Antisemitic; advised that he would win, Starmer instead paid off the litigants at huge cost to party members).

This Writer is not the only person who can see what he has done. We all can. Most of us were disgusted by this failure of leadership. And here he was, defending it. Weak.

Kuenssberg wrote: “He was … asked why he did not seem to inspire Labour members in the same way his predecessor Jeremy Corbyn did.”

I have scanned the article thoroughly, but could not find any answer to the question, anywhere in it. Starmer evaded the question completely. Perhaps he knows that he will never inspire Labour members – and certainly not voters – in the way Corbyn did.

So he avoided answering. I think he knows that he will get his response at the ballot box – if he even gets that far.

Because Starmer’s continued leadership of the Labour Party is by no means a foregone conclusion. He was elected on the basis of 10 pledges – all of which he subsequently abandoned.

“The world has changed since they were made,” he pleaded. Not very much!

“I stand by the principles and the values that are behind the pledges I made.” That is only believable if we take those principles and values to be treachery and dishonesty.

“But the most important pledge I made is that I would turn our party into a party that would be fit for government.” And that is yet another pledge broken.

If Starmer became leader in the role of a doctor, come to heal the ailments that have led voters to consider Labour unfit, then his subsequent actions are equivalent to breaking the patient’s arms and legs, blinding them, injecting them with acid and unplugging their life-support machine.

This Writer feels defiled, simply reading the article and writing about it afterwards. There is something inherently unpleasant about Starmer and his approach to politics.

I remember with distaste the way he cold-shouldered a party activist who wanted to discuss how Labour would tackle climate change. Faced with the result of a conference vote that fully-endorsed the activist’s views, his lieutenant Rachel Reeves then adopted much of what had already been approved, as if it had been the party leadership’s idea.

That’s nauseating.


How does he think he can win?

If he’s honest with himself, I think he’s relying on the claim – over-employed by his adherents – that there simply isn’t any other choice. “If you don’t support Starmer, you’re supporting the Tories,” they lie.

The reason is as described above: Starmer is “Continuity Johnson”. And there is no point in replacing the Tories with a party that is exactly the same – or, in Starmer’s case, very slightly worse.

After this week’s conference, Labour members across the UK will be taking a long, hard look at the party they joined, and asking themselves if it measures up to their standards.

You see, UK politics is too often characterised as tribal – join our tribe, support our tribe; you have no other choice.

That’s not acceptable now; not when the two main tribes are as close to the same as makes no real difference.

It is time for us all to compare what the UK’s political parties – all of them – have to offer us with what we actually want.

If they won’t offer it, then we need to walk away…

,,, and start a movement of our own that does.

Have YOU donated to my crowdfunding appeal, raising funds to fight false libel claims by TV celebrities who should know better? These court cases cost a lot of money so every penny will help ensure that wealth doesn’t beat justice.

Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:

Donate Button with Credit Cards

Here are four ways to be sure you’re among the first to know what’s going on.

1) Register with us by clicking on ‘Subscribe’ (in the left margin). You can then receive notifications of every new article that is posted here.

2) Follow VP on Twitter @VoxPolitical

3) Like the Facebook page at

Join the Vox Political Facebook page.

4) You could even make Vox Political your homepage at

And do share with your family and friends – so they don’t miss out!

If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!

Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.

The Livingstone Presumption is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:


3 thoughts on “Deluded, treacherous Keir Starmer thinks he can win elections after splitting the Labour Party

  1. Paul Atkin

    There’s no need to start another movement – there already is one. Isn’t the Green Party the natural home for progressive voters who won’t stomach voting for Tory Labour? What do you think?

  2. tim duckitt

    hi mike

    i thought i’d drop you a quick message re: kier stalin

    you haven’t once mentioned why the gammon won’t vote labour while he’s in charge. they actually hate him so bad they’re not even posting due to ‘everyone already knows’ & ‘old news’

    he was the public prosecutor responsible for NFAing cases related to child abuse.

    i don’t know which cases, but the gammon would take JC over stalin

    i’m sure someone will point out the factoids if you find a gammon group to ask questions in

  3. Grey Swans

    Admin Over 50s party (policies for ages 1 to 100) is the sole Left party that can win next general election, as includes the vital Grey Vote and the 1950s to 1980s born ladies, who’ve lost from pension age rise aka the abolition of retirement.

    Tories, right wing Labour and Lib Dems, and even The Greens, are enemies of Grey Vote and 1950s to 1980s born pension campaign ladies, and have been when in government, to all the way back to 1978.

    Help Over 50s party to begin, and help all ages to get the vital Clement Attlee government we need from next general election.

    over50sparty org uk

Comments are closed.