Labour MPs rebelled against Keir Starmer over WASPI compensation as their leaders' hypocrisy was revealed for all to hear

Labour MPs rebelled against Keir Starmer over WASPI compensation

A group of 10 Labour MPs rebelled against Keir Starmer over WASPI compensation – and quite right, too.

Starmer was happy to give lip-service to the cause of women who have been financially attacked by government moves to increase the state pension age – when he was in Opposition.

Now he is prime minister, both he and his Chancellor, Rachel Reeves, have said the Women Against State Pension Inequality will receive no justice from them – despite an Ombudsman’s report saying they should be paid compensation.

But when the Scottish National Party (SNP) launched a Bill to reverse that decision, 10 Labour MPs – Jonathan Brash, Julia Buckley, Neil Duncan-Jordan, Chris Hinchliff, Terry Jermy, Brian Leishman, Emma Lewell-Buck, Melanie Onn, Jon Trickett and Steve Witherden – supported it. The vote was won with 105 in favour and none against.

Buy Cruel Britannia in print here. Buy the Cruel Britannia ebook here. Or just click on the image!

SNP Westminster leader, Stephen Flynn, introducing the Bill, moved, and I think it’s important that his words get a wider reception than they would if they were left in Hansard, “that leave be given to bring in a Bill to require the Secretary of State to publish measures to address the findings of the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman in its report entitled “Women’s State Pension age: our findings on injustice and associated issues”; to require the Secretary of State to publish proposals for a compensation scheme for women born between 6 April 1950 and 5 April 1960 inclusive who have been affected by increases in the state pension age; and for connected purposes.

“I do so with no joy whatsoever—indeed, my reason for doing so is born more out of complete and utter frustration—but because it is the right thing to do for a number of reasons. It is the right thing to do because we require trust in politics, and I think that all of us at this moment in time, certainly in this Chamber, are conscious of the breakdown in trust between ourselves in this Parliament and the public outside.

“For those of us who have stood alongside the WASPI women for many years, for those of us who have pledged to support the WASPI women for many years, for those of us who promised to take action if we were ever to gain Government office, it is important that that trust is repaid, and my Bill seeks to do that. It seeks to do the right thing by those to whom we made a promise.

“This is also the right thing to do because, for many of the women who are impacted, this injustice is not alone. Throughout their lives, many will unfortunately have been impacted by the fact that they did not receive a salary comparable to that of their male counterparts. These are women who will have faced the injustice of knowing that they were not able to get themselves up the career ladder simply because they were women and there was a male counterpart. They are the people who will have known that whether or not they were going to have children might well decide what their career opportunities were. It was an unforgivable injustice that they had to experience, and we should not be compounding that injustice by not giving them the compensation they deserve for having their pension entitlement changed.

“This is also the right thing to do because the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman tells us it that is the right thing to do. If we do not have trust and confidence in the estate in which we operate, and if we do not support the outcomes of our ombudsman, I must simply ask: where are the public to go? Where are they to place their trust? The ombudsman made it abundantly clear that these women were the victims of maladministration, and that the Department for Work and Pensions had not acted in the way that it should have done. Much worse than that, however, the ombudsman was clear that the DWP could not be trusted to rectify the wrong that it had imposed on those women. So what happened? We were effectively delegated the responsibility to respond, and what did we see? We saw a Government turn their back on those women, but not before, of course, they had held placards; not before, of course, they had given warm words when they had felt that it was politically expedient to do so.”

I have video of the following so feel free to watch, listen and read along:

“Let us listen to some of those warm words. Let us start off with the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, who said:

“’All your working life you’ve got in mind the date on which you can retire and get your pension, and just as you get towards it, the goalposts are moved and you don’t get it, and it’s a real injustice.’

“Let us look at what the Deputy Prime Minister said:

“’They want their money back, and quite rightly so.’

“Let us look at what the Chancellor of the Exchequer said:

“’Pleasure to speak in the state pension age debate and talk about women who are being treated so badly. Govt please listen. #WASPI.’

“The Home Secretary said:

“’I want to keep fighting for a fair deal for the WASPI women.’

“The Business Secretary said:

“’I have always supported local campaigners and will continue to stand up for the WASPI women of Tameside. I know you will fight on.’

“The Defence Secretary said:

“’Labour will correct this historic wrong.’

“For those of us in Scotland, let us look north of the border. The leader of the Labour party in Scotland, Anas Sarwar, said:

“’Under my leadership, WASPI women will finally receive the justice they deserve.’

“The wider Labour party in Scotland stated:

“’Labour will right the historical wrong of pension discrimination by compensating more than 300,000 women in Scotland with an average of £15,000. When Labour wins, Scotland’s women win.’

“What happened? A parcel of rogues, indeed.

“I was one of many who were in this Chamber prior to Christmas when the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions decided to make a statement right before Parliament broke off to confirm that the Government were sorry for the maladministration that took place, that they were going to make sure the Department for Work and Pensions, which inflicted this wrong upon those women, would never do so again and that lessons would be learned—but that was your lot. The evidence they used to back up their decision not to award any compensation—in fact, not even to discuss the concept of compensation in this Chamber—was based upon the data, as I understand it, of just 200 respondents from many years ago.

“The Government then went on to say that there is no money at all, as if they are not the ones who get to decide how money is spent; as if they are not the ones who have decided to box themselves in on pretty much every tax lever that exists; as if—I appreciate that not everyone in the Chamber will agree with me on this point—they are not the ones who have decided to simply accept the broken economic norms formed by leaving the European Union and rejecting access to the single market and the customs union, and to accept that it will cause economic damage and limit the money is available to them. None of that was their fault at all. How very dare they? Do they think the public are zipped up the back? Do they think the WASPI women are not listening and watching the decisions they have chosen to take?

“This is a defining issue. Many of us in the last Parliament watched on as a TV show changed the mind of the Government in respect of the Post Office Horizon scandal. Many of us watched on as Parliament forced the Government to change tack on the infected blood scandal. Many of us have spoken about the Equitable Life scandal, the Hillsborough disaster, the loan charge debacle and, indeed, the WASPI campaign. Defining issues of the last Parliament can still be defining issues of this Parliament, but only if the Government act to provide the compensation and redress that these women so badly deserve.

“There was a man who went on to become the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, who said:

“’The walls of Westminster are so high.’

“He was inferring that we do not listen to what the public want, nor do we see what they are fighting for and what they believe in. But we know where the public stand on this issue. We know that they believe the WASPI women should be given the compensation that they deserve, and with this Bill we will seek to provide it.”

The Bill will now have a second reading on March 7 – but it is not expected to get any further.


Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
(
but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:

Donate Button with Credit Cards

Be among the first to know what’s going on! Here are the ways to manage it:

1) Register with us by clicking on ‘Subscribe’ (bottom right of the home page). You can then receive notifications of every new article that is posted here.

2) Follow VP on Twitter @VoxPolitical

3) Like the Facebook page at https://www.facebook.com/VoxPolitical/

Join the Vox Political Facebook page.

4) You could even make Vox Political your homepage at http://voxpoliticalonline.com

5) Follow Vox Political writer Mike Sivier on BlueSky

6) Join the MeWe page at https://mewe.com/p-front/voxpolitical

7) Feel free to comment!

And do share with your family and friends – so they don’t miss out!

If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!

Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.

Cruel Britannia is available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

The Livingstone Presumption is available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:

SWAHTprint SWAHTeBook

2 Comments

  1. Jeffrey Davies January 29, 2025 at 11:12 am - Reply

    just ten hmmm it shows how many we can’t trust this party is doomed

  2. Tony January 29, 2025 at 1:43 pm - Reply

    He challenged Farage quite robustly during the general election debates.

Leave A Comment