The bankers are breaking Labour's economy, so why doesn't Rachel Reeves act? Was it done under the Chancellor's orders?

The bankers are breaking Labour’s economy, so why doesn’t Rachel Reeves act?

The Guardian is reporting that the bankers are breaking Labour’s economy, so why doesn’t Rachel Reeves act?

It seems the banks are selling bonds at a loss in an act known as Quantitative Tightening, and this is pushing up the interest rate on government debt; that’s why the government is paying more to service its debts.

Reeves could stop this. Why doesn’t she? Was it her idea?

The Guardian stated:

The Bank of England has been doing “quantitative tightening” – selling back to the financial markets bonds that it… acquired from them during the financial crises of 2008 and 2020.

Buy Cruel Britannia in print here. Buy the Cruel Britannia ebook here. Or just click on the image!

The article explained how the system works:

The money won’t fund government spending but will be removed from the private sector economy. The private sector doesn’t want to buy this many bonds, so it needs an incentive – and the incentive is a high interest rate.

Worse still, because bond prices and interest rates work as an inverse of each other, the cost of the bonds themselves will be low. So it will be making large losses for the government on the sale.

It artificially raises interest rates, which means the cost of government borrowing has risen – it is the Bank of England that is responsible for this trap into which Rachel Reeves and her Treasury have fallen.

And it explained what this means:

Reeves will find it much more difficult to balance her books – even though we all know that she doesn’t really need to do that in any case.

Oh – no, wait! I wrote that, back in JanuaryAnd I got it from the economist Richard Murphy.

Either the Guardian‘s staff have only just realised what’s going on, or they have only just decided to tell their readers – who, even now, outnumber those of Vox Political many times.

It’s nice that they have finally got round to it – but feel free to tell all your friends who has the best information at a better time.

Source: The Guardian view on Rachel Reeves’s spending cuts: a choice, not an economic necessity | Editorial | The Guardian


Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
(
but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:

Donate Button with Credit Cards

Be among the first to know what’s going on! Here are the ways to manage it:

1) Register with us by clicking on ‘Subscribe’ (bottom right of the home page). You can then receive notifications of every new article that is posted here.

2) Follow VP on Twitter @VoxPolitical

3) Like the Facebook page at https://www.facebook.com/VoxPolitical/

Join the Vox Political Facebook page.

4) You could even make Vox Political your homepage at http://voxpoliticalonline.com

5) Follow Vox Political writer Mike Sivier on BlueSky

6) Join the MeWe page at https://mewe.com/p-front/voxpolitical

7) Feel free to comment!

And do share with your family and friends – so they don’t miss out!

If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!

Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.

Cruel Britannia is available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

The Livingstone Presumption is available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:

SWAHTprint SWAHTeBook

Leave A Comment