Share this post:

Millions of disabled people with so-called “less severe” conditions could lose vital financial support if the government’s proposed changes to Personal Independence Payment (PIP) go ahead.

That includes people with fluctuating or invisible disabilities, long-term mental health challenges, or even some with serious physical impairments who happen not to meet the government’s increasingly arbitrary eligibility criteria.

For many, this won’t just be a reduction in income — it will be a collapse of their basic independence.

PIP helps cover the unavoidable extra costs of being disabled: heating, mobility, equipment, transport, care.

When that support is removed, people don’t just tighten their belts — they go into debt, skip meals, lose access to treatment, or drop out of work entirely.

Yet amid all the talk of targeting resources more “efficiently” or helping only “those who really need it,” the government has quietly obscured one fundamental truth:

There is no alternative safety net.

There is no backup scheme, no replacement benefit, no meaningful local provision for those who are cut off.

The official story is that these people don’t need PIP.

The reality is that without it, they won’t cope.

The government’s framing: a strategy of distortion

For more than a year now, both the previous Conservative government and the current Labour administration have peddled a narrative that PIP is “too broad” and “unsustainable.”

They said it is going to too many people who are not, in their view, “disabled enough.”

Civil servants talk about “tightening eligibility.”

Ministers speak of “rebalancing support.”

And behind those coded phrases lies a blunt objective: to reduce the number of people getting PIP.

The justification is that PIP should only go to those in the “greatest need.”

It sounds rational — until you ask how “need” is being defined, and what is supposed to happen to everyone else.

The idea that PIP is being handed out too freely simply does not match the lived experience of those applying for it.

As countless claimants, advisors and disability advocates have shown, the process is already adversarial, exhausting, and riddled with rejections that are only overturned on appeal.

The issue is not generosity — it is survival.

Yet the government’s narrative continues to flatten complexity.

In doing so, it warps public understanding of what PIP is for, who it helps, and what is lost when it’s taken away.

The reality of PIP: what the data — and lives — show

A Big Issue investigation has laid bare the harsh reality for many of the people receiving PIP.

Drawing on data from Money Wellness — a debt advice charity that supports thousands of disabled people — and interviews with organisations like Turn2Us and Fightback4Justice, the article showed what’s at stake.

Among Money Wellness clients with disabilities:

• 80 per cent are in priority arrears — debts that threaten housing or utilities.

• 60 per cent are referred for food vouchers.

• 67 per cent end up with a debt relief order (DRO), indicating they have almost no disposable income or assets.

This is not overspending – it’s poverty.

People with disabilities face higher costs, not just in theory but in hard monthly numbers: £975 in extra spending on average, according to disability charity Scope.

For one in five, that figure exceeds £1,000.

And PIP is one of the only benefits specifically designed to help cover those costs.

The Big Issue also shared real-life stories:

• A man undergoing chemotherapy nearly lost his Motability car — essential for accessing treatment — because of an impossible paperwork deadline.

• A single dad named Mark, struggling with his health and unsure how to navigate the benefits system, was only able to complete a successful PIP claim thanks to digital tools from Turn2Us.

• Others were skipping essentials or falling into debt simply to cover care, heating, and transport.

These are not people coasting on “generous” benefits.

They are people clinging to a single form of support that keeps everything else from falling apart.

The Timms Review: delay without protection

Much of the mainstream media coverage of PIP reform has focused on Labour’s decision to pause the implementation of changes until late 2026, pending the outcome of the Timms Review of eligibility criteria.

On paper, this seems like a welcome shift — a more cautious, evidence-led approach.

But here’s the uncomfortable truth: the Timms Review has no formal connection to benefit eligibility reform.

The government has committed only to wait for the review before enacting changes.

There is no commitment to accept its findings; no promise of consultation afterwards; and certainly no guarantee that it will inform the shape of PIP reform.

In effect, the review has been used as a political buffer — something to deflect scrutiny while keeping the original objective (cutting support) quietly intact.

Meanwhile, those affected remain in limbo, knowing they could be targeted for removal as soon as 2026 — and that nothing in the review process offers meaningful protection.

So what happens if PIP is taken away?

This is the question that cuts through the spin:

If someone with a disability loses PIP, how are they meant to survive?

The government has never offered a coherent answer – because there isn’t one.

1. Can they work?

Many already do.

PIP is not means-tested, and a significant portion of claimants work part-time or in flexible roles — precisely because they can manage some work if they have support.

But without PIP to fund transport, equipment, or basic living costs, they may be forced to stop working altogether.

Others simply can’t work reliably, due to pain, fatigue, or mental health instability.

And there are no meaningful job schemes, nor is there any targeted support for those who lose PIP but are still unable to work full-time.

2. Can they rely on Universal Credit?

Universal Credit is a bare-bones subsistence benefit.

It doesn’t cover the extra costs of disability.

It is also conditional and punitive, subject to sanctions and clawbacks — and includes no equivalent to the mobility or care components of PIP.

3. Can they turn to councils or charities?

Maybe — if they live in a council area that still has a hardship fund.

Or if they can find a charity with capacity.

But these are emergency lifelines, not sustainable support systems.

Demand is already outpacing supply, as the Big Issue piece made clear.

4. Can they fall back on savings or family support?

Many are already in debt. Many live alone or in precarious housing. There is no cushion. If PIP is taken away, there is no fallback.

This isn’t reform — it’s punishment

The reality is simple, and devastating.

There is no system waiting to catch people who lose PIP.

There are no services to replace what the benefit provides.

And there is no coherent plan for keeping these people afloat.

Yet the government continues to imply that many current recipients don’t really need it; that “tightening” eligibility will simply redirect support to where it’s most needed.

It won’t.

It will push people, already on the edge, over it.

Quietly – invisibly – but predictably.

PIP is not perfect — but it works.

It does what no other part of the welfare system does: it gives disabled people some control, some stability, and some dignity.

If ministers want to argue for taking that away, they need to say what will replace it.

So far, they haven’t. Because they can’t.

Source: The importance of PIP for disabled people has never been clearer – Big Issue

Share this post: