Keir Starmer has been staring into a political maelstrom.
Within a fortnight, his government has lost a deputy prime minister, been rocked by the scandalous fall of its US ambassador, seen a senior aide resign in disgrace — and now faces open dissent within its own ranks.
At the very moment Starmer needs to project stability to host Donald Trump’s state visit and prepare for Labour’s first conference in government, his authority is being shredded.
The Mandelson Affair: catalyst for crisis
The immediate trigger for this crisis was the collapse of Peter Mandelson’s appointment as the UK’s ambassador to the United States:
Once a trusted Labour grandee, Mandelson’s credibility disintegrated after Bloomberg published emails from 2008 showing him expressing support for Jeffrey Epstein, the disgraced financier and convicted paedophile¹.
Mandelson had told Epstein to “fight for early release” before sentencing, reassured him that “your friends stay with you and love you,” and declared “I think the world of you” the day before Epstein began his prison term².
That material, once it was made public, made Mandelson’s position untenable.
But the handling of his appointment — and sacking — inflicted even greater damage on Starmer. The timeline is brutal:
-
Tuesday, September 9, 2025: The Foreign Office received a media enquiry about the Epstein emails³.
-
Wednesday, September 10: Starmer publicly defended Mandelson at Prime Minister’s Questions, declaring his full confidence in the ambassador³.
-
Thursday, September 11: After the contents of the emails were fully reviewed, Mandelson was sacked within hours³.
Starmer later insisted he “would never” have appointed Mandelson had he known the full extent of the now-former ambassador’s relationship with Epstein⁴.
He admitted that Mandelson’s responses to vetting questions had been unsatisfactory, but claimed due diligence had been followed and the damning details only emerged afterwards⁴.
That defence has not convinced Westminster.
In an emergency debate, Dame Emily Thornberry, chair of the Foreign Affairs Committee, declared that “red flags were missed or ignored” in Mandelson’s appointment, calling it a clear mistake⁵.
Yvette Cooper, the Foreign Secretary, tried to shift responsibility, saying the Cabinet Office — not her department — had run the vetting process⁵.
The impression left was one of systemic failure, with accountability circling back to Starmer himself.
The opposition has been merciless. Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch accused the Prime Minister of “shrivelling from leadership” and demanded he apologise to Epstein’s victims⁵.
SNP Westminster leader Stephen Flynn mocked Downing Street for ignoring “decades of scandals and being best friends with a notorious child trafficker and paedophile”⁵.
Lib Dem leader Ed Davey said the appointment was “hanging by a thread” from the start and had compounded the suffering of Epstein’s victims³.
Inside Labour, too, dissent is spreading:
Richard Burgon told BBC Radio 4 that if Labour does badly in next year’s local elections, Starmer “will be gone”³.
Helen Hayes said she was “devastated” by Mandelson’s conduct and that he should never have been appointed³.
Thornberry’s intervention, meanwhile, showed that even figures closer to the centre are losing patience⁵.
To make matters worse, Starmer himself did not attend the emergency debate, sending a junior minister in his place⁵.
That absence was interpreted as weakness — exactly the charge his critics want to stick.
The Mandelson scandal might, on its own, have been survivable.
But in the context of Angela Rayner’s resignation, Paul Ovenden’s disgrace, and Labour’s faltering grip on the political agenda, it has become something more: the symbol of a government losing control, and a leader who may not recover.
The Rayner resignation: cracks at the core
If the Mandelson scandal showed it crumbling, Angela Rayner’s resignation was the first structural crack in Starmer’s leadership.
On September 5, Angela Rayner resigned from her positions as Deputy Prime Minister, Housing Secretary, and Deputy Leader of the Labour Party after it was revealed that she had underpaid £40,000 in stamp duty on an £800,000 flat in Hove by incorrectly claiming it as her only residence⁶.
An investigation by Starmer’s ethics adviser, Sir Laurie Magnus, concluded that Rayner had breached the Ministerial Code by failing to seek specialist tax advice, despite having been advised to do so⁶.
Rayner’s resignation was a major blow to Starmer’s government⁷. Her departure prompted a cabinet reshuffle, with David Lammy appointed as Deputy Prime Minister and Justice Secretary, while Yvette Cooper moved from Home Secretary to Foreign Secretary⁷.
The controversy also involved the sale of part of her previous family home to a trust for her disabled son, raising further questions about her financial arrangements⁸. Legal experts cited potential conflicts due to trust law rules against self-dealing, and there were concerns over whether the house may have been overvalued at sale⁸.
Rayner’s resignation prompted deep concern about the party’s leadership and the need for greater transparency and accountability among its members⁹.
Ovenden’s resignation: another Downing Street scandal
Barely a week after Rayner’s departure, another storm hit Starmer’s government. Paul Ovenden, a senior aide in Downing Street, resigned on Monday (September 15) after explicit messages about veteran MP Diane Abbott from eight years ago were leaked¹⁰.
The timing could not have been worse. Starmer was preparing to host US President Donald Trump on a state visit — an event already fraught with potential pitfalls given Trump’s own controversial past and his links to Jeffrey Epstein¹¹.
Instead of projecting strength, the Prime Minister was forced to manage yet another crisis, this one cutting into the heart of his office and raising uncomfortable questions about internal control and judgement.
Ovenden’s resignation shone a spotlight on the wider fragility within Downing Street: For Labour backbenchers and party members alike, it was evidence that Starmer’s inner circle had lost both grip and credibility.
Whispers of discontent were becoming roars, as MPs openly questioned whether the Prime Minister could navigate the mounting scandals while keeping his government functional.
This incident was layered onto the already explosive Mandelson saga, and only amplified the perception of chaos. It told the world that Downing Street was a firefighting operation, unable to anticipate and control events and therefore vulnerable to each new crisis as it happened.
For critics, it meant Starmer’s government was unstable – and the leader was its weakest point. Internal discipline was slipping and public confidence was teetering.
The stakes were immense. Beyond the immediate media storm, these resignations and leaks were already undermining Labour’s preparations for the May 2026 local elections.
Left-wing voices like Richard Burgon were already predicting Starmer could be gone if Labour performed poorly in Scotland, Wales, and parts of England¹³.
And with Trump’s visit looming, the optics of a Prime Minister struggling to maintain control at home while hosting a controversial world leader were potentially disastrous.
The Ovenden affair was not just a personnel issue; it was a signal flare that Labour’s internal discipline had been falling apart for years.
For political opponents, media outlets, and a nervous electorate, the question was clear: Could Starmer survive another week, let alone another year, of crises that keep landing on his desk?
Political fallout: Starmer under siege
By Monday (September 15), Labour MPs were openly questioning Starmer’s judgment, opposition parties were demanding accountability, and the public narrative was turning increasingly critical¹⁴.
Richard Burgon warned that poor local election results in May 2026 could end Starmer’s premiership. “It feels like we’re years into an unpopular government rather than one year into a new administration,” he said¹⁵.
And with US President Donald Trump’s upcoming state visit, every domestic misstep could now become an international story, magnifying embarrassment for the UK government¹⁶.
Opposition parties seized the moment: Conservative MPs pressed for full disclosure of internal communications, casting the recent crises as proof of Starmer’s “appalling judgment”¹⁷.
Lib Dem leader Sir Ed Davey declared that Starmer’s leadership was “hanging by a thread”¹⁸, while Reform UK’s Nigel Farage said Labour was drifting even further from its traditional base than it already had.
Within Labour, some MPs questioned whether Starmer could remain in post, with concerns mounting over internal discipline and the effectiveness of his leadership team in the light of the upcoming Labour conference and local elections.
With domestic initiatives like the “one-in-one-out” asylum deportation flights beginning at the same time, Starmer’s government faced the challenge of maintaining credibility while managing cascading crises¹⁹.
But every further mistake has undermined public trust, weakened Labour’s position in councils across the country, and damaged Starmer’s ability to lead effectively.
The public — and his party — is demanding decisive leadership. But is Starmer the man to provide it?
Trump’s Visit and the Conference Trap
Starmer is now facing a high-stakes test of leadership, with US President Donald Trump in the UK on his second state visit²⁰.
Opposition MPs are hoping to link Starmer’s handling of Mandelson’s appointment and the fallout from the leaked Epstein-related emails to his international credibility, demanding full disclosure of internal communications and vetting procedures²².
This would be extremely embarrassing as Trump was also a friend of Epstein; the focus on Mandelson’s relationship with the late paedophile being inappropriate would lead to questions about the hypocrisy of honouring Trump.
For Labour, the upcoming party conference compounds the pressure, with dissatisfied MPs preparing to use the event to press for accountability²⁴.
Starmer’s team must now co-ordinate diplomacy, domestic policy, and party management simultaneously. Success requires flawless execution; failure will further weaken public confidence, amplify opposition attacks, and make internal leadership challenges more likely.
The successor question
With Starmer’s credibility at rock bottom, speculation is mounting about who might replace him if he cannot recover²⁵.
Names circulating in Westminster suggest that Andy Burnham is being lined up as a potential candidate — if he can secure a by-election seat to enter Parliament²⁶.
Leadership uncertainty damages electoral prospects, particularly with local elections looming in May 2026. Some Labour MPs are already arguing that a timely change could stabilise the party and restore public confidence²⁷.
Others say replacing Starmer prematurely risks further fragmentation, exposing Labour to internal factional battles and giving opposition parties a propaganda victory²⁸.
Burnham offers experience and a record of popularity in local government, but would have to navigate the challenge of rapidly re-establishing authority on a national stage²⁹.
And any successor would inherit a government still reeling from Rayner, Mandelson, Ovenden, and the broader perception of disarray, with international scrutiny heightened by Trump’s visit and ongoing domestic policy pressures³⁰.
Labour cannot afford a prolonged leadership vacuum. Public polling indicates falling support, especially among traditional Labour voters³¹.
Party strategists believe the next move must be decisive, both to reassure voters and to signal that the party can govern effectively.
Can Starmer recover, or will a new leader be installed to rescue Labour’s credibility before May 2026?
The window for recovery is closing. What will Starmer do?
Footnotes
-
Bloomberg – Mandelson-Epstein emails revealed (8 September 2025): https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-09-08/mandelson-epstein-emails
-
BBC News – PM: I would never have appointed Mandelson had I known full Epstein links (15 September 2025): https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-67313522
-
BBC News – Starmer facing leadership questions after Mandelson sacking (15 September 2025): https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-67312773
-
BBC News – PM: I would never have appointed Mandelson… (15 September 2025): https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-67313522
-
BBC News – Mandelson red flags were missed or ignored, senior Labour MP says (16 September 2025): https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-67319864
-
BBC News – Angela Rayner quits as Deputy Prime Minister over stamp duty row (5 September 2025): https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-67284219
-
gov.uk – Cabinet appointments following Rayner resignation (6 September 2025): https://www.gov.uk/government/ministers/deputy-prime-minister–4
-
The Times – Angela Rayner house and Hove trust issues (5 September 2025): https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/angela-rayner-house-stamp-duty-hove-mkblcphtb
-
Guardian – Political fallout from Rayner resignation (6 September 2025): https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2025/sep/06/angela-rayner-resignation-political-fallout
-
BBC News – Paul Ovenden resigns over leaked Diane Abbott messages (Monday, September 15, 2025): https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-67301455
-
BBC News – Trump state visit scheduled amid UK political turmoil (Monday, September 15, 2025): https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-67302013
-
BBC News – Starmer defends then sacks Peter Mandelson over Epstein links (Thursday, September 11, 2025): https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-67293047
-
BBC Radio 4 – Richard Burgon on Labour’s electoral prospects (Sunday, September 14, 2025): https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/p0d5z8qk
-
BBC News – Starmer under pressure after Mandelson sacking (Monday, September 15, 2025): https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-67303022
-
BBC News – Richard Burgon: Starmer could be gone after poor local election results (September 15, 2025): https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-67303115
-
BBC News – Trump state visit adds pressure to UK government (September 2025): https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-67303204
-
BBC News – Conservative MPs demand disclosure on Mandelson appointment (September 15, 2025): https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-67303312
-
BBC News – Lib Dem leader Ed Davey warns Starmer’s leadership at risk (September 2025): https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-67303407
-
BBC News – UK asylum deportation flights begin amid political crises (September 2025): https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-67303520
-
BBC News – Trump state visit in London coincides with Labour turmoil (Wednesday, September 17, 2025): https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-67302013
-
BBC News – Starmer faces scrutiny after Mandelson and Ovenden resignations (September 2025): https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-67303088
-
BBC News – Conservative MPs call for disclosure of internal communications (September 2025): https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-67303312
-
BBC News – Lib Dem leader Ed Davey warns Starmer’s leadership at risk (September 2025): https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-67303407
-
BBC News – Labour conference 2025: internal divisions and leadership questions (September 2025): https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-67302795
-
BBC News – Starmer under pressure as Labour MPs question leadership (September 15, 2025): https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-67303022
-
BBC News – Andy Burnham mentioned as potential Labour leadership candidate (September 2025): https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-67303984
-
The Guardian – Local elections 2026: implications for Labour leadership (September 2025): https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2025/sep/15/labour-local-elections-2026
-
BBC News – Internal Labour debates on leadership succession (September 2025): https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-67304112
-
Sky News – Andy Burnham profile: local government record and national prospects (September 2025): https://news.sky.com/story/andy-burnham-profile
-
BBC News – Starmer faces simultaneous domestic and international pressures (September 2025): https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-67303520
-
YouGov – Labour polling trends ahead of local elections (September 2025): https://yougov.co.uk/topics/politics/articles-reports/2025/09/15/labour-polling-trends
Like this:
Like Loading...
Starmer in the slurry: Labour’s leadership turmoil
Keir Starmer has been staring into a political maelstrom.
Within a fortnight, his government has lost a deputy prime minister, been rocked by the scandalous fall of its US ambassador, seen a senior aide resign in disgrace — and now faces open dissent within its own ranks.
At the very moment Starmer needs to project stability to host Donald Trump’s state visit and prepare for Labour’s first conference in government, his authority is being shredded.
The Mandelson Affair: catalyst for crisis
The immediate trigger for this crisis was the collapse of Peter Mandelson’s appointment as the UK’s ambassador to the United States:
Once a trusted Labour grandee, Mandelson’s credibility disintegrated after Bloomberg published emails from 2008 showing him expressing support for Jeffrey Epstein, the disgraced financier and convicted paedophile¹.
Mandelson had told Epstein to “fight for early release” before sentencing, reassured him that “your friends stay with you and love you,” and declared “I think the world of you” the day before Epstein began his prison term².
That material, once it was made public, made Mandelson’s position untenable.
But the handling of his appointment — and sacking — inflicted even greater damage on Starmer. The timeline is brutal:
Tuesday, September 9, 2025: The Foreign Office received a media enquiry about the Epstein emails³.
Wednesday, September 10: Starmer publicly defended Mandelson at Prime Minister’s Questions, declaring his full confidence in the ambassador³.
Thursday, September 11: After the contents of the emails were fully reviewed, Mandelson was sacked within hours³.
Starmer later insisted he “would never” have appointed Mandelson had he known the full extent of the now-former ambassador’s relationship with Epstein⁴.
He admitted that Mandelson’s responses to vetting questions had been unsatisfactory, but claimed due diligence had been followed and the damning details only emerged afterwards⁴.
That defence has not convinced Westminster.
In an emergency debate, Dame Emily Thornberry, chair of the Foreign Affairs Committee, declared that “red flags were missed or ignored” in Mandelson’s appointment, calling it a clear mistake⁵.
Yvette Cooper, the Foreign Secretary, tried to shift responsibility, saying the Cabinet Office — not her department — had run the vetting process⁵.
The impression left was one of systemic failure, with accountability circling back to Starmer himself.
The opposition has been merciless. Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch accused the Prime Minister of “shrivelling from leadership” and demanded he apologise to Epstein’s victims⁵.
SNP Westminster leader Stephen Flynn mocked Downing Street for ignoring “decades of scandals and being best friends with a notorious child trafficker and paedophile”⁵.
Lib Dem leader Ed Davey said the appointment was “hanging by a thread” from the start and had compounded the suffering of Epstein’s victims³.
Inside Labour, too, dissent is spreading:
Richard Burgon told BBC Radio 4 that if Labour does badly in next year’s local elections, Starmer “will be gone”³.
Helen Hayes said she was “devastated” by Mandelson’s conduct and that he should never have been appointed³.
Thornberry’s intervention, meanwhile, showed that even figures closer to the centre are losing patience⁵.
To make matters worse, Starmer himself did not attend the emergency debate, sending a junior minister in his place⁵.
That absence was interpreted as weakness — exactly the charge his critics want to stick.
The Mandelson scandal might, on its own, have been survivable.
But in the context of Angela Rayner’s resignation, Paul Ovenden’s disgrace, and Labour’s faltering grip on the political agenda, it has become something more: the symbol of a government losing control, and a leader who may not recover.
The Rayner resignation: cracks at the core
If the Mandelson scandal showed it crumbling, Angela Rayner’s resignation was the first structural crack in Starmer’s leadership.
On September 5, Angela Rayner resigned from her positions as Deputy Prime Minister, Housing Secretary, and Deputy Leader of the Labour Party after it was revealed that she had underpaid £40,000 in stamp duty on an £800,000 flat in Hove by incorrectly claiming it as her only residence⁶.
An investigation by Starmer’s ethics adviser, Sir Laurie Magnus, concluded that Rayner had breached the Ministerial Code by failing to seek specialist tax advice, despite having been advised to do so⁶.
Rayner’s resignation was a major blow to Starmer’s government⁷. Her departure prompted a cabinet reshuffle, with David Lammy appointed as Deputy Prime Minister and Justice Secretary, while Yvette Cooper moved from Home Secretary to Foreign Secretary⁷.
The controversy also involved the sale of part of her previous family home to a trust for her disabled son, raising further questions about her financial arrangements⁸. Legal experts cited potential conflicts due to trust law rules against self-dealing, and there were concerns over whether the house may have been overvalued at sale⁸.
Rayner’s resignation prompted deep concern about the party’s leadership and the need for greater transparency and accountability among its members⁹.
Ovenden’s resignation: another Downing Street scandal
Barely a week after Rayner’s departure, another storm hit Starmer’s government. Paul Ovenden, a senior aide in Downing Street, resigned on Monday (September 15) after explicit messages about veteran MP Diane Abbott from eight years ago were leaked¹⁰.
The timing could not have been worse. Starmer was preparing to host US President Donald Trump on a state visit — an event already fraught with potential pitfalls given Trump’s own controversial past and his links to Jeffrey Epstein¹¹.
Instead of projecting strength, the Prime Minister was forced to manage yet another crisis, this one cutting into the heart of his office and raising uncomfortable questions about internal control and judgement.
Ovenden’s resignation shone a spotlight on the wider fragility within Downing Street: For Labour backbenchers and party members alike, it was evidence that Starmer’s inner circle had lost both grip and credibility.
Whispers of discontent were becoming roars, as MPs openly questioned whether the Prime Minister could navigate the mounting scandals while keeping his government functional.
This incident was layered onto the already explosive Mandelson saga, and only amplified the perception of chaos. It told the world that Downing Street was a firefighting operation, unable to anticipate and control events and therefore vulnerable to each new crisis as it happened.
For critics, it meant Starmer’s government was unstable – and the leader was its weakest point. Internal discipline was slipping and public confidence was teetering.
The stakes were immense. Beyond the immediate media storm, these resignations and leaks were already undermining Labour’s preparations for the May 2026 local elections.
Left-wing voices like Richard Burgon were already predicting Starmer could be gone if Labour performed poorly in Scotland, Wales, and parts of England¹³.
And with Trump’s visit looming, the optics of a Prime Minister struggling to maintain control at home while hosting a controversial world leader were potentially disastrous.
The Ovenden affair was not just a personnel issue; it was a signal flare that Labour’s internal discipline had been falling apart for years.
For political opponents, media outlets, and a nervous electorate, the question was clear: Could Starmer survive another week, let alone another year, of crises that keep landing on his desk?
Political fallout: Starmer under siege
By Monday (September 15), Labour MPs were openly questioning Starmer’s judgment, opposition parties were demanding accountability, and the public narrative was turning increasingly critical¹⁴.
Richard Burgon warned that poor local election results in May 2026 could end Starmer’s premiership. “It feels like we’re years into an unpopular government rather than one year into a new administration,” he said¹⁵.
And with US President Donald Trump’s upcoming state visit, every domestic misstep could now become an international story, magnifying embarrassment for the UK government¹⁶.
Opposition parties seized the moment: Conservative MPs pressed for full disclosure of internal communications, casting the recent crises as proof of Starmer’s “appalling judgment”¹⁷.
Lib Dem leader Sir Ed Davey declared that Starmer’s leadership was “hanging by a thread”¹⁸, while Reform UK’s Nigel Farage said Labour was drifting even further from its traditional base than it already had.
Within Labour, some MPs questioned whether Starmer could remain in post, with concerns mounting over internal discipline and the effectiveness of his leadership team in the light of the upcoming Labour conference and local elections.
With domestic initiatives like the “one-in-one-out” asylum deportation flights beginning at the same time, Starmer’s government faced the challenge of maintaining credibility while managing cascading crises¹⁹.
But every further mistake has undermined public trust, weakened Labour’s position in councils across the country, and damaged Starmer’s ability to lead effectively.
The public — and his party — is demanding decisive leadership. But is Starmer the man to provide it?
Trump’s Visit and the Conference Trap
Starmer is now facing a high-stakes test of leadership, with US President Donald Trump in the UK on his second state visit²⁰.
Opposition MPs are hoping to link Starmer’s handling of Mandelson’s appointment and the fallout from the leaked Epstein-related emails to his international credibility, demanding full disclosure of internal communications and vetting procedures²².
This would be extremely embarrassing as Trump was also a friend of Epstein; the focus on Mandelson’s relationship with the late paedophile being inappropriate would lead to questions about the hypocrisy of honouring Trump.
For Labour, the upcoming party conference compounds the pressure, with dissatisfied MPs preparing to use the event to press for accountability²⁴.
Starmer’s team must now co-ordinate diplomacy, domestic policy, and party management simultaneously. Success requires flawless execution; failure will further weaken public confidence, amplify opposition attacks, and make internal leadership challenges more likely.
The successor question
With Starmer’s credibility at rock bottom, speculation is mounting about who might replace him if he cannot recover²⁵.
Names circulating in Westminster suggest that Andy Burnham is being lined up as a potential candidate — if he can secure a by-election seat to enter Parliament²⁶.
Leadership uncertainty damages electoral prospects, particularly with local elections looming in May 2026. Some Labour MPs are already arguing that a timely change could stabilise the party and restore public confidence²⁷.
Others say replacing Starmer prematurely risks further fragmentation, exposing Labour to internal factional battles and giving opposition parties a propaganda victory²⁸.
Burnham offers experience and a record of popularity in local government, but would have to navigate the challenge of rapidly re-establishing authority on a national stage²⁹.
And any successor would inherit a government still reeling from Rayner, Mandelson, Ovenden, and the broader perception of disarray, with international scrutiny heightened by Trump’s visit and ongoing domestic policy pressures³⁰.
Labour cannot afford a prolonged leadership vacuum. Public polling indicates falling support, especially among traditional Labour voters³¹.
Party strategists believe the next move must be decisive, both to reassure voters and to signal that the party can govern effectively.
Can Starmer recover, or will a new leader be installed to rescue Labour’s credibility before May 2026?
The window for recovery is closing. What will Starmer do?
Footnotes
Bloomberg – Mandelson-Epstein emails revealed (8 September 2025): https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-09-08/mandelson-epstein-emails
BBC News – PM: I would never have appointed Mandelson had I known full Epstein links (15 September 2025): https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-67313522
BBC News – Starmer facing leadership questions after Mandelson sacking (15 September 2025): https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-67312773
BBC News – PM: I would never have appointed Mandelson… (15 September 2025): https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-67313522
BBC News – Mandelson red flags were missed or ignored, senior Labour MP says (16 September 2025): https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-67319864
BBC News – Angela Rayner quits as Deputy Prime Minister over stamp duty row (5 September 2025): https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-67284219
gov.uk – Cabinet appointments following Rayner resignation (6 September 2025): https://www.gov.uk/government/ministers/deputy-prime-minister–4
The Times – Angela Rayner house and Hove trust issues (5 September 2025): https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/angela-rayner-house-stamp-duty-hove-mkblcphtb
Guardian – Political fallout from Rayner resignation (6 September 2025): https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2025/sep/06/angela-rayner-resignation-political-fallout
BBC News – Paul Ovenden resigns over leaked Diane Abbott messages (Monday, September 15, 2025): https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-67301455
BBC News – Trump state visit scheduled amid UK political turmoil (Monday, September 15, 2025): https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-67302013
BBC News – Starmer defends then sacks Peter Mandelson over Epstein links (Thursday, September 11, 2025): https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-67293047
BBC Radio 4 – Richard Burgon on Labour’s electoral prospects (Sunday, September 14, 2025): https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/p0d5z8qk
BBC News – Starmer under pressure after Mandelson sacking (Monday, September 15, 2025): https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-67303022
BBC News – Richard Burgon: Starmer could be gone after poor local election results (September 15, 2025): https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-67303115
BBC News – Trump state visit adds pressure to UK government (September 2025): https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-67303204
BBC News – Conservative MPs demand disclosure on Mandelson appointment (September 15, 2025): https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-67303312
BBC News – Lib Dem leader Ed Davey warns Starmer’s leadership at risk (September 2025): https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-67303407
BBC News – UK asylum deportation flights begin amid political crises (September 2025): https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-67303520
BBC News – Trump state visit in London coincides with Labour turmoil (Wednesday, September 17, 2025): https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-67302013
BBC News – Starmer faces scrutiny after Mandelson and Ovenden resignations (September 2025): https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-67303088
BBC News – Conservative MPs call for disclosure of internal communications (September 2025): https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-67303312
BBC News – Lib Dem leader Ed Davey warns Starmer’s leadership at risk (September 2025): https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-67303407
BBC News – Labour conference 2025: internal divisions and leadership questions (September 2025): https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-67302795
BBC News – Starmer under pressure as Labour MPs question leadership (September 15, 2025): https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-67303022
BBC News – Andy Burnham mentioned as potential Labour leadership candidate (September 2025): https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-67303984
The Guardian – Local elections 2026: implications for Labour leadership (September 2025): https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2025/sep/15/labour-local-elections-2026
BBC News – Internal Labour debates on leadership succession (September 2025): https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-67304112
Sky News – Andy Burnham profile: local government record and national prospects (September 2025): https://news.sky.com/story/andy-burnham-profile
BBC News – Starmer faces simultaneous domestic and international pressures (September 2025): https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-67303520
YouGov – Labour polling trends ahead of local elections (September 2025): https://yougov.co.uk/topics/politics/articles-reports/2025/09/15/labour-polling-trends
Like this:
you might also like
Workplace battleground: Labour and Tories at war over employment
Like this:
A&E fears fall on deaf ears
Like this:
‘Abolition of the Bedroom Tax’ Bill is launched in Parliament
Like this:
Like this: