Starmer snubs unions over threat to party democracy – & may now face leadership challenge at conference
This Writer was practically salivating with anticipation about what I might read on BBC News after discovering the following on Twitter:
🚨 | NEW: During a key meeting between Trade Union leaders and the Labour leadership today, Keir Starmer was told in no uncertain terms that he needs to stop trying to rig rules in his favour, and instead "refocus the Labour party on the country and concerns of working people".
— Evolve Politics (@evolvepolitics) September 22, 2021
And what did I find?
Labour conference: Keir Starmer sets out what he stands for in essay https://t.co/FsYQdc7dnV
— BBC Politics (@BBCPolitics) September 22, 2021
If this is what he stands for then it could have been done in far fewer than 11,500 words – and that’s down from his original claim that it would be 14,000 (let’s thank providence for small mercies)!
The short version is that Starmer has abandoned all Labour Party values. He proposes a “contribution” society – not in which contributions go from those according to their means, to those according to their needs – but (if I’m reading this right) from those who can be made to work the hardest to the UK as a whole (by which I’m presuming he means rich people like himself).
And he’s suddenly fully in favour of privatisation:
https://twitter.com/liamyoung/status/1440794984785973257
What’s the difference from Toryism?
And there’s a nasty return to the old “strivers v skivers” rhetoric that demonised a generation of people with disabilities and long-term illnesses and sent many of them to early graves because of benefit refusals on the basis of trumped-up excuses.
Some commentators have referred to fascist language that is reminiscent of Vichy France.
Others were more visual in their condemnation:
Keir Starmer’s 11,500 word essay has been released.
I have noted the good bits to save you reading the whole thing. pic.twitter.com/OAeBuAwg0c
— Rachael Swindon (@Rachael_Swindon) September 22, 2021
Personally I think that, if it’s supposed to be an essay, we should give it a mark and a comment:
D-
Needs improvement.
The BBC story unaccountably neglects to mention the meeting with the unions, so let’s see what we can get from elsewhere.
It seems that not even one union supported Starmer’s plan to return to an “electoral college” system of voting in Labour leadership elections, that would steal a huge amount of power from party members by depriving them of their individual votes altogether, and hand a huge amount to MPs – the party’s 200+ elected representatives would have one-third of the vote.
It shouldn’t come as a surprise – Starmer’s offer would not have benefited the unions in any way so they were able to reject it without any qualms:
Even under the electoral college, trade union members have one member one vote in their section. They have minds of their own. Often, they don't vote for the candidate their union recommends (e.g. they voted for Blair). This change won't give union leaderships any more leverage.
— Alex Nunns (@alexnunns) September 22, 2021
Because of that, over about a decade, trade unions, including, importantly, the GMB, worked hard to unshackle themselves from this system so leadership and deputy leadership candidates more responsive to their members' needs had a chance. This rule change undoes all that work.
— Alex Nunns (@alexnunns) September 22, 2021
Starmer's change also reintroduces some ridiculous anomalies, which several of the people who seem to be supporting it used to say were intolerable. Because this has been sprung on the party, none of this has been considered…
— Alex Nunns (@alexnunns) September 22, 2021
Why should a trade union member who votes Tory get to choose the next Labour leader?
There's no answer, because it's just a factional power grab.
— Alex Nunns (@alexnunns) September 22, 2021
Will, horror of horrors, supporters of proscribed groups who have only just been expelled from Labour get a say over the next Labour leader through their trade union?
There's no answer, because it's just a factional power grab.
— Alex Nunns (@alexnunns) September 22, 2021
And of course, handing veto powers to 200 high-earning middle-class MPs will do nothing to make Labour relevant to working-class people.
Now: we had understood that, if he didn’t get enough support from the unions (or indeed any, as has happened), Starmer would scrap the plan and would not take it to the NEC for inclusion in the agenda for the annual conference at the weekend.
It seems that claim was a lie.
So my understanding is Starmer is bringing his leadership stitch up plan to the party's National Executive Committee on Friday, despite it having being rejected by unions, and his team are not even looking for a deal, but as one source says, "doubling down".
— Owen Jones (@OwenJones84) September 22, 2021
I think Starmer is panicking. He reckons this will be his only chance to force through the changes he needs to secure his position as leader.
You see, Starmer’s hired guns at the Governance and Legal Unit have apparently been busily despatching notices of suspension to constituency party delegates, in order to ‘fix’ the result of conference votes.
https://twitter.com/David__Osland/status/1440736355584073730
Recipients of these letters are being told, it seems, that the reasons for the suspension of their membership will only be revealed after the conference, in what must be a breach of investigatory rules that is also attacking them financially (because they’ll already have paid for transport and accommodation at the Brighton-based conference) and psychologically:
To understand, you’d have to walk in the shoes of activists who’ve dedicated their lives to making the world a better, more equal, more peaceful place; to facing down racism, often at great personal cost & given countless hours to educating the next generation. (2/6)
— Ben Sellers (@MrBenSellers) September 19, 2021
Of course, this has always happened to good people. Socialists & trade unionists have always faced attack – some physical, some mental – but in a world where social media captures everything, that shaming is now both context-free & public at the same time. (4/6)
— Ben Sellers (@MrBenSellers) September 19, 2021
I’ve said it many times before, but the Labour Party as an organisation cannot go on exposing their members (unpaid volunteers for the party, remember) to this reckless, vicious treatment, whilst remaining silent, or worse, complicit. It’s beyond unacceptable. (6/6)
— Ben Sellers (@MrBenSellers) September 19, 2021
As a victim of this treatment, I can confirm the truth of Mr Sellers’s words.
So Starmer has launched an attack against the Labour movement, on several fronts: against the trade unions, by snubbing them and ignoring their wishes; against party members, by pressing on with his plan to disenfranchise them while also subjecting them to the torture of the disciplinary process; and to the wider Labour-supporting electorate by betraying everything the party should represent, in his scummy little screed.
Fortunately it seems he’s not going to have it all his own way.
The unions will oppose his plans – and that’s half the conference vote against him before he has even made his first proposal. More than half, if he has deliberately suspended a significant number of delegates.
The remaining delegates – if they’re worth a farthing – will want to reject his plan in solidarity with their wronged colleagues. Right, delegates?
And even some Labour MPs are preparing to rebel against this insult to democracy. Starmer may think this is bad enough:
Dear @Keir_Starmer. Enough!
No to gerrymandering
• As an MP I refuse to accept my vote is worth the same as 2,160 fee paying Labour Members.
• We must stick to one member one vote. Equality is in Labour’s DNA.
— Jon Trickett MP (@jon_trickett) September 22, 2021
Worse for Starmer – much worse – is this:
John McDonnell has backed calls for a Labour leadership challenge if Keir Starmer goes ahead with his rule changes. Well done John. 👏
— The Left Wing Society 🇵🇸 (@LeftWingSociety) September 22, 2021
Here’s corroboration, for the sceptical:
John McDonnell backs Labour leadership election if Keir Starmer pushes rule changes through – Liverpool Echo https://t.co/LJlwnRbFaN
— Richard Seymour (@leninology) September 22, 2021
Expect fireworks at this conference.
Strange to think that these shenanigans all started because Starmer was worried about losing the vote to confirm his despotic acting general secretary David Evans in the role that has made him despised across the UK.
Whatever happens, Evans is toast.
Have YOU donated to my crowdfunding appeal, raising funds to fight false libel claims by TV celebrities who should know better? These court cases cost a lot of money so every penny will help ensure that wealth doesn’t beat justice.
Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
(but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:
Here are four ways to be sure you’re among the first to know what’s going on.
1) Register with us by clicking on ‘Subscribe’ (in the left margin). You can then receive notifications of every new article that is posted here.
2) Follow VP on Twitter @VoxPolitical
3) Like the Facebook page at https://www.facebook.com/VoxPolitical/
Join the Vox Political Facebook page.
4) You could even make Vox Political your homepage at http://voxpoliticalonline.com
And do share with your family and friends – so they don’t miss out!
If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!
Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.
The Livingstone Presumption is now available
in either print or eBook format here:
Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:
The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:
Here is a link to Keir Starmer’s just published pamphlet
https://labourlist.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/The-Road-Ahead-FINAL_WEB-fri.pdf
Well, if anybody can be bothered to wade through it in search of any more meaning than I’ve already described… there it is.
Stammer the spammer the cuckoo in the nest we had a chance and flunked it now we pay the price
Not sure how any of this squares with your headline claim that Starmer could face a leadership challenge at conference. There will certainly be a – hopefully successful – challenge to his `authority’, but a leadership challenge cannot happen `at conference’. According to the rule book a challenge has to be launched at conference – “valid nominations shall be printed in the
final agenda for Party conference, together with the names of the nominating organisations and Commons members of the PLP supporting the nominations.” Not happening
If there’s a call for a ‘no confidence’ vote or a direct challenge from the floor, it will have to be treated seriously.
I think you’re trying to confuse the issue by referring to party rules that won’t actually apply in the situation I have described.