When the rich pay for everything – and control everything
How Britain’s shrinking population and widening inequality threaten our democracy – and how pubs might show us the way forward.
Pubs, cafés, cinemas, music venues—these are more than businesses.
They’re signs of life in our communities.
When they suffer, it means more than just lost revenue; it means lost connections, lost confidence, and lost prosperity.
Behind this story lies a deeper crisis: Britain’s tax base is shrinking, and the burden is falling more heavily on fewer shoulders—especially the very wealthy.
If we don’t change course, we may end up with a country where the rich fund the state, and in return, the state serves the rich.
This month, donations through Ko-fi helped keep Vox Political going — and I’ve just posted a quick update there about what’s next.
I’m working on a new investigation, a reissued book collection (free to £20+ donors), and plenty of videos to ruffle a few feathers.
Take a look behind the scenes: https://ko-fi.com/voxpolitical
And if you’ve already chipped in — thank you. You’re making this work possible.
The tax base is shrinking—and ageing
Britain’s population is getting older.
With birth rates falling and net immigration increasingly politicised, there are fewer working-age people supporting the economy.
The Office for Budget Responsibility has already warned: unless something changes, public finances will become unsustainable.
When fewer people are working—and more are drawing pensions or relying on care—tax revenues fall while demand for spending rises.
It’s a double bind.
In the past, immigration helped offset this trend.
Now, that tap is being turned off.
The rich are paying more—but also gaining power
Here’s the paradox: the top one per cent of earners now contribute more than 30 per cent of the UK’s income tax.
On paper, that’s progressive.
But in practice, it makes the state financially dependent on a tiny elite.
When your tax base is narrow, it’s vulnerable.
If the wealthy threaten to move abroad or lobby for tax cuts, governments flinch.
We’ve seen this already—with the reversal of modest wealth tax proposals, the protection of non-dom status (until very recently), and the lack of serious corporate tax reform.
In effect, the wealthiest now say: “We fund this country—so don’t you dare tell us how to spend our money.”
Get my free guide: “10 Political Lies You Were Sold This Decade” — just subscribe to our email list here:
👉 https://voxpoliticalonline.com
Disposable income is disappearing
It’s not just about who pays tax.
It’s about who can afford to participate in the economy at all.
Your local pub is a perfect test case.
When ordinary people don’t have enough disposable income, they stop going out.
That hits pubs, restaurants, cinemas—anywhere people go to feel human.
And it means small businesses fail, workers lose jobs, and local economies contract.
So while the government cheers for high employment, the real economy tells a different story: people working multiple jobs, just to get by.
Working to survive—not to live.
The future looks grim—unless we change it
If nothing changes, we risk creating a feedback loop:
-
The rich pay more → The state becomes reliant on them
-
They lobby for favourable policy → Inequality grows
-
The public grows poorer → The economy stagnates
-
The rich gain even more leverage → Democracy erodes
But this isn’t inevitable.
There’s another path.
Building an economy from the bottom up
Rather than chasing billionaires or fearing capital flight, a bold government would invest in the people who are still here—those who don’t have private jets or offshore accounts, but who still buy a pint, take the bus, or go out for a meal.
Here’s what that might look like:
Policy | Effect | Which Parties Support It? |
---|---|---|
Universal childcare | Frees people to work; reduces household costs | Greens, Lib Dems, SNP |
Rebuilding public transport | Boosts footfall for local businesses | Greens, Labour (somewhat), Lib Dems |
Mass social housing | Reduces rent burden; builds equity | Greens, SNP, Plaid Cymru |
VAT cuts on hospitality | Helps pubs and cafés stay open | Proposed by some local business groups; no major party currently offers this |
Living wage rises | Increases real incomes and spending power | Labour, Greens |
Land value tax / wealth tax | Shifts tax burden from income to accumulated wealth | Greens, SNP, Plaid Cymru; not Labour under Starmer |
Green public works programme | Creates jobs, builds infrastructure | Greens, previously Labour (Corbyn), some unions |
Community wealth building | Keeps profits local; builds resilience | Supported by Greens, some Labour councils (e.g. Preston) |
These are not radical ideas—they’re survival strategies.
And they’d benefit everyone: not just workers and renters, but small businesses, local councils, and yes, even your friend’s struggling pub.
This month, donations through Ko-fi helped keep Vox Political going — and I’ve just posted a quick update there about what’s next.
I’m working on a new investigation, a reissued book collection (free to £20+ donors), and plenty of videos to ruffle a few feathers.
Take a look behind the scenes: https://ko-fi.com/voxpolitical
And if you’ve already chipped in — thank you. You’re making this work possible.
Conclusion: a new measure of national health
Instead of asking whether the FTSE is rising, or whether billionaires are staying in the UK, ask this:
Can the average person afford to go to the pub on a Friday night?
If the answer is no, your economy is broken.
If fewer and fewer people can afford to participate in the public life of their communities, then no amount of top-end tax revenue will save us.
It’s time to stop appeasing wealth and start investing in people—not just because it’s fair, but because it’s the only sustainable path forward.
Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
(but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:
Be among the first to know what’s going on! Here are the ways to manage it:
1) Register with us by clicking on ‘Subscribe’ (bottom right of the home page). You can then receive notifications of every new article that is posted here.
2) Follow VP on Twitter @VoxPolitical
3) Like the Facebook page at https://www.facebook.com/VoxPolitical/
Join the Vox Political Facebook page.
4) You could even make Vox Political your homepage at http://voxpoliticalonline.com
5) Follow Vox Political writer Mike Sivier on BlueSky
6) Join the MeWe page at https://mewe.com/p-front/voxpolitical
7) Feel free to comment!
And do share with your family and friends – so they don’t miss out!
If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!
Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.
Cruel Britannia is available
in either print or eBook format here:
The Livingstone Presumption is available
in either print or eBook format here:
Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:
The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:
Re your view
When fewer people are working—and more are drawing pensions or relying on care—tax revenues fall while demand for spending rises.
Wrong.
Pensioners and people on benefit / receiving care are amongst the majority of tax revenue collected from us all that comes from stealth / indirect taxation that comes from money spent and bills paid. This is 75 per cent of all tax revenue from us 99 per cent.
Pensioners are not a burden on working age people. This is the lie that has killed off women aged in our 50s and 60s since 2011, from the pension age rises.
http://www.over50sparty.org.uk
This is a really valuable addition to the conversation.
You’re absolutely right that most tax paid by ordinary people today comes through indirect and stealth taxes like VAT, fuel duty, council tax, and more — not just income tax. Pensioners, benefit recipients, and low-income households still contribute significantly, just often in less visible (but still painful) ways.
My article wasn’t arguing that pensioners are a burden — far from it. It was critiquing the system that frames them that way, especially when it’s used to justify regressive policies like raising the pension age or cutting support. That narrative has had a devastating impact, particularly on older women, as you point out.
What we really need is a full, honest look at who pays, how much, and why the system keeps squeezing the same people. And that includes asking why the rich — who benefit most — contribute proportionally less than many on fixed or low incomes.
I appreciate your insight. It strengthens the case for change.