Labour asks good questions on Universal Credit programme – Campaign4Change

Labour has a “Universal Credit Rescue Committee” whose membership includes a former Rolls Royce CIO, Jonathan Mitchell, writes Tony Collins on the Campaign4Change blog.

Mitchell is quoted in Government Computing as saying that it would be irresponsible for a Labour government to continue spending large amounts of money on Universal Credit without getting answers to important questions such as:

  • Is there a comprehensive business case – one that clearly outlines the expected benefits, demonstrating that the Universal Credit project is viable?
  • Is the business case agreed by all stakeholders?
  • Is there clarity about what needs to be achieved?
  • Is there a stable specification explaining exactly how the new processes will work and how they will be automated?
  • Is the project being managed and staffed by people and organisations with appropriate levels of experience, track-record and expertise, all of whom are capable of delivering the benefits of the project and ensuring safe roll-out in a timely manner?
  • Is the project fully under control?
  • Can it absorb the changes demanded by a new incoming Government? If not, can the project be brought under control at an acceptable cost with respect to the business case, through a re-planning exercise?
  • Once such a re-planning exercise is completed, are we convinced that it was successful and that the project will now proceed to a satisfactory completion in a controlled fashion?
  • Are there appropriate “control gates” in place to ensure that all aspects of each phase of the plan are fully completed (and that projected costs to completion preserve the business case) before allowing the project to move safely onto each next stage?

Mitchell said, “Universal Credit is one of those applications that might look straightforward when you first look at it, but this is most definitely not the case. I believe there are significant process and technical challenges to overcome.”

Good questions, most of which the Department for Work and Pensions is unlikely to be able to answer satisfactorily today.

To read the rest of this article, visit Campaign4Change.

Follow me on Twitter: @MidWalesMike

Join the Vox Political Facebook page.

Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
bringing you the best of the blogs!

Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:


Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:

Donate Button with Credit Cards


  1. gavinpollock September 22, 2014 at 8:32 pm - Reply

    They probably are good questions, but a better one would be “Is Universal Credit going to help people in Poverty”?

    • Mike Sivier September 22, 2014 at 10:55 pm - Reply

      I can answer that right now: No.
      Universal Credit is intended to save money for a Tory, or Tory-led government.
      I can’t remember how much they want to save every year (not off the top of my head) – perhaps someone in the know could chip in for gavinpollock’s peace of mind?

  2. Mr.Angry September 23, 2014 at 8:25 am - Reply

    Mike you omitted to say “Save money for a Tory and their ilk” and also what ever they proclaim to have saved has been wasted on an ill thought out project and IDS repeated appeals. I am more than worried Rachel Reeves is still talking about use of contractors for the failed WCA, is she serious?

Leave A Comment