What banter taught me – Mike Stuchbery

Last Updated: November 27, 2014By

At first you might wonder what an article about bullying behaviour in school has to do with national politics. The answer, of course, is everything.

Mike Stuchbery’s article about the response he received from pupils and adults can tell us a great deal about the way people behave in their political lives; it’s about open-mindedness and flexibility running up against an attitude that is hidebound, rigid and – well – bullying.

He writes: On the fifth of November, after a particular fractious day at school, I sat down and wrote a post about how I wished to ‘ban’ the use of the word ‘banter’ as an excuse for bullying.

Seeing the fuss that … erupted across Britain, I was a little apprehensive about turning up to school the next day.

I soldiered on anyway and was surprised to find that the staffroom, full of people that would have otherwise greeted me, was eerily quiet. It was like I wasn’t there at all. I made a crack about how I’d made the papers while someone else who proposed dropping English as a subject hadn’t had any response. I was told, in no uncertain terms, that I could have brought down Ofsted on the school (they’d been there the previous week) and that the kids might think I thought they were poorly behaved – that might be why I was getting the reception I was getting.

The kids, bless ‘em, were a lot louder. Everywhere I went I was greeted with shouts of ‘BANTER!’. I decided to laugh with them, turning around in mock horror when somebody shouted it. The tone changed from a cautious hostility to something a lot warmer. A couple of kids  came up to me and asked why I’d made my comments. I told them that I wasn’t opposed to banter – just using it as an excuse for giving others a hard time. Once we had the conversation, the kids were fine and the majority agreed with me. I repeated the conversation with each of my classes and got much the same response. We had some good dialogue and it helped my classroom practice as a result.

The above is only a series of excerpts from the full piece, but you can see where this is going. Please visit Mr Stuchbery’s blog for the full article, including his own conclusions. Do you think he was treated fairly by his colleagues? Or did the pupils give him a more reasonable – indeed, wiser – hearing?

Follow me on Twitter: @MidWalesMike

Join the Vox Political Facebook page.

Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
(
but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:

Donate Button with Credit Cards

Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
bringing you the best of the blogs!

Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:

SWAHTprint SWAHTeBook

 

2 Comments

  1. Chris Mckenzie November 28, 2014 at 7:35 pm - Reply

    http://anotherangryvoice.blogspot.co.uk/2014/01/new-labour-left-wing-myth.html I thought this might interest you Mike. I’m not trolling, I would appreciate your view of this analysis of Labour.

    • Mike Sivier November 28, 2014 at 8:09 pm - Reply

      I’m very familiar with the Angry Yorkshireman’s articles. He makes very good points. Note that he is referring to the New Labour government of 1997-2010, not the Labour Party of today.
      What does this have to do with Mike Stuchbery’s article?

Leave A Comment