Keith Vaz can only embarrass Labour if he retains Justice Committee membership

Keith Vaz MP [Image: Andy Commins/Daily Mirror].

Keith Vaz MP [Image: Andy Commins/Daily Mirror].

It’s true – if Mr Vaz tries to hold on to any high-profile role within Parliament while he is being investigated by the police, he will be an easy target for Tory snipers and will bring embarrassment down on the Labour Party.

He should withdraw from such roles – including membership of the Justice Committee – for the duration of the inquiry. Obviously, if any matter goes to trial and any guilt is proved, he’ll have long-term questions to answer.

But that doesn’t mean his place on the committee should go empty. Tories who have been demanding the removal of Mr Vaz should also accept the nomination of a Labour Party replacement, to ensure the committee is at full strength at all times.

That probably isn’t what they want, but it is the democratic way.

Pressure is mounting on Keith Vaz to step down from a powerful Commons committee after it emerged he is at the centre of a police investigation over drug allegations .

The police probe was launched after a review into claims the Labour MP discussed cocaine with male escorts at sex parties.

Mr Vaz said he would ‘cooperate with the investigation in any way he can’.

But the Tories said it was ‘not appropriate’ for the disgraced Labour MP to stay on the Justice Committee during the police probe.

Source: MPs tell shamed Keith Vaz to quit powerful Justice Committee amid police drugs probe – Mirror Online

Join the Vox Political Facebook page.

If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!

Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
(
but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:

Donate Button with Credit Cards

Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.


The Livingstone Presumption is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:

SWAHTprint SWAHTeBook

latest video

news via inbox

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

3 Comments

  1. Lamia November 14, 2016 at 1:03 pm - Reply

    “Tories who have been demanding the removal of Mr Vaz should also accept the nomination of a Labour Party replacement, to ensure the committee is at full strength at all times.

    That probably isn’t what they want, but it is the democratic way.”

    This is a non-issue. There is a convention that parties do not block the nominees of other parties, and there is no reason at all to expect the Tories (or any other party) to start doing so now.

    In fact Vaz was voted onto the committee overwhelmingly by Tory MPs. It is possible that there was some mischievous intent in that, because the Vaz story looks likely to damage Labour badly.

    In fact, Vaz’s nomination was one instance where the Tories ought to have done precisely what you finger-wag against them doing in future, i.e. they ought to have blocked his place on the committee. They would have been doing Parliament, including themselves and even their Labour opponents (apart from Vaz) a favour by doing so.

    There are going to be a lot of people in Parliament (and beyond) looking bad as a result of this – precisely at the moment when there are loud voices coming from Parliament asserting its sovereignty over ‘those ghastly people’ who voted Leave.

    Good times.

    • Mike Sivier November 14, 2016 at 1:56 pm - Reply

      My suggestion was that the Tories want Vaz gone, with no replacement.
      Of course there was mischievous intent behind him being voted onto the committee.
      No, it won’t have any effect on Brexit.

  2. Lin Wren November 14, 2016 at 5:23 pm - Reply

    That should be the policy for ANY MP under police investigation

Leave A Comment