Met police want to stop social media sharing of rogue police cracking heads

Police violence: it seems our law guardians are upset at being filmed attacking members of the public, with the images subsequently going on social media. Simple solution: don’t commit violent attacks on members of the public.

Apparently breaking the heads of members of the public isn’t such fun when you can be identified and shamed on the social media.

Of course that’s not what the Metropolitan Police Federation is saying. Its spokespeople call it “trial by social media” and say it should be banned.

They would, wouldn’t they?

They’re justifying their demand by pointing to verdicts of investigations into police conduct that have resulted in no action being taken.

But doesn’t that just raise questions about the way the police are policed?

Doesn’t it give us cause to question what police need to do before they are penalised for the outrageous behaviour they have been caught doing on camera?

This Writer has seen a woman being punched in the face by a policeman, her head snapping back almost into the camera taking the footage.

We all saw the police men practically stripping a female protester at a demonstration in Manchester. Why were they doing that and when will they be punished for it?

We’ve all seen footage of police harassing people from ethnic minorities, for no readily-apparent reason.

The MetFed wants those videos to be banned – and I don’t think it’s because there is no case to be answered.

I think it is because the MetFed doesn’t want to be embarrassed by the behaviour of its own people.

And what about this:

Two good points, don’t you think? For clarity, they are:

1. If nobody had taken footage of George Floyd being throttled under the knee of a US police officer, nothing would have been done about it.

2. It is hypocritical of the MetFed to complain about the sharing of images that shame the police when its own officers have shared images of them behaving inappropriately (to say the least) with the dead bodies of members of the public.

If the police did not behave inappropriately; if they weren’t prone to violence against the public they are meant to protect; and if we didn’t have reason to believe the system was corruptly supporting them, then nobody would be recording these images – they simply would not happen.

So, before these people demand what are frankly fascist measures to stop us from holding them to account – and remember, they can still record us (although I understand footage from cop cameras is likely to be restricted due to failings in policing by the officers involved) – it seems clear they should try cleaning up their act instead.

But I suppose that would take all the fun out of it.

Source: Met Fed calls on chiefs to end trial by media after IOPC verdict | UK Police News – Police Oracle

Have YOU donated to my crowdfunding appeal, raising funds to fight false libel claims by TV celebrities who should know better? These court cases cost a lot of money so every penny will help ensure that wealth doesn’t beat justice.

Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:

Donate Button with Credit Cards

Here are four ways to be sure you’re among the first to know what’s going on.

1) Register with us by clicking on ‘Subscribe’ (in the left margin). You can then receive notifications of every new article that is posted here.

2) Follow VP on Twitter @VoxPolitical

3) Like the Facebook page at

Join the Vox Political Facebook page.

4) You could even make Vox Political your homepage at

And do share with your family and friends – so they don’t miss out!

If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!

Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.

The Livingstone Presumption is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:


6 thoughts on “Met police want to stop social media sharing of rogue police cracking heads

  1. Jon Lisle-Summers

    “Trial by social media”? Erm…. I thought, apparently naïvely, that video or pictures are “evidence” or don’t the police do that kind of work anymore?

  2. Dez

    Their behaviour is out of control and deserves to be captured and used against any of those types of thugs in costumes. Hopefully with them culprits being removed from the front line or police force entirely or transferred to admin and retraining. I personally think the force commanders were instructed to rack up the Covid protest brutality to ensure the tamer protesters did not rise up and join the braver protesters and cause this Globalist Government any grief on the streets and in their own back yards whilst they took over the UK in a covert Covid Coup.

  3. disabledgrandad

    Normally I am pretty pro-police but NOT in this manner. Sorry, your BS is showing you want these videos banned because it exposes how thuggish and vile certain police are!!!

    Then when exposed are they punished and thrown out of the police in disgrace?

    Haha Nope, a bunch of cops in a nice chummy committee finds them always not guilty and straight back out and harassing and violence against the public they go. So NO met police we won’t be hiding your crap behaviour just because it embarrasses you!

    We deserve better police that are there for the UK citizen. Not just another tool of repression and power used, to crush out any decent…

  4. sheridannoelcrewsteamhammer321

    Police use body cams as evidence in court to justify poor behaviour of the public so why can’t the public provide there own evidence of poor police behaviour.

  5. SteveH


    I see that Priti Patel is in trouble again.

    Priti Patel’s detention policies found to breach human rights rules
    Court finds home secretary accountable for failures to ensure that deaths in immigration detention centres are investigated properly
    The judge found that Priti Patel’s decision to deport a potential witness to a death in custody was unlawful.
    Wed 14 Apr 2021 17.17 BST
    Last modified on Wed 14 Apr 2021 22.21 BST
    A landmark court ruling has held the home secretary, Priti Patel, accountable for failures in ensuring that deaths in immigration detention centres are properly investigated.
    Two judges in the immigration court ruled on Wednesday that three of the home secretary’s detention policies breached human rights rules and that she could not frustrate or undermine inquiries into these deaths.

Comments are closed.