Child poverty has risen to its highest level yet and – due to Labour’s attack on benefit recipients – may reach five million in a very short time.
Figures from the government’s own Department for Work and Pensions suggest that by April 2024, there were 4.45 million children living in a household of relative low income after housing costs are deducted – the government’s own standard measure for poverty.
That is an increase of 100,000 children from the previous year – and equates to 31 per cent of children in the UK.
Chancellor Rachel Reeves’s decision to halve incapacity benefits for new claimants and introduce tighter criteria around the Personal Independence Payment for those with long term physical or mental health conditions, means an extra 250,000 people, including 50,000 children, will be pushed into relative poverty by these changes, according to the government’s own impact assessment.
Buy Cruel Britannia in print here. Buy the Cruel Britannia ebook here. Or just click on the image!
The Child Poverty Action Group (CPAG) has already predicted that 4.8 million children will be in poverty by the end of this Parliament in 2029-30. Labour’s attack on society’s poorest people may accelerate that increase beyond five million.
Wow. Five million children in poverty under a government going under the ‘Labour’ banner. I wonder what Tony Blair, who reduced the number of children in poverty (after housing costs – the same measure as above) by half a million during his time as a Labour prime minister, would think of it.
Under Blair, the number of children in relative poverty after housing costs were deducted fell from 4.3 million in 1997 to 3.8 million in 2002, and stayed at that level until Labour was voted out of office in 2010.
But consider this: child poverty has risen sharply since 2021 – the time of the Covid-19 crisis when people like Gary Stevenson say wealth inequality increased sharply.
Isn’t this new statistic evidence that he is right to say that the UK’s wealth needs to be re-balanced away from the super-rich – otherwise prospects for current and succeeding generations can only worsen?
Isn’t that what the figures show?
Gary argues that a wealth tax would make a huge difference. He was on the BBC’s Question Time calling for it, only to be poo-pooed by the likes of Camilla Tominey, who said it had been tried in around 12 countries, all of whom had abandoned it apart from Switzerland.
She was wrong about that. Switzerland has the most successful wealth tax, bringing in the equivalent of £25 billion per year. But wealth taxes are also levied in Norway (£37 billion), Spain (£1.2 billion) and France (although it has been modified into a property wealth tax there).
These taxes have been abandoned in Germany, Sweden, the Netherlands, Denmark, Austria, Ireland and Finland for various reasons – most commonly administrative costs and avoidance.
It occurs to This Writer that part of the problem in those places might have been asking wealthy people to devise a tax on wealth.
Perhaps it would be better to send working- or middle-class people off to Switzerland to find out how to levy a successful wealth tax, and then act on the result without attempting to modify it?
Or would that be too straightforward?
Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
(but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:
Be among the first to know what’s going on! Here are the ways to manage it:
1) Register with us by clicking on ‘Subscribe’ (bottom right of the home page). You can then receive notifications of every new article that is posted here.
2) Follow VP on Twitter @VoxPolitical
3) Like the Facebook page at https://www.facebook.com/VoxPolitical/
Join the Vox Political Facebook page.
4) You could even make Vox Political your homepage at http://voxpoliticalonline.com
5) Follow Vox Political writer Mike Sivier on BlueSky
6) Join the MeWe page at https://mewe.com/p-front/voxpolitical
7) Feel free to comment!
And do share with your family and friends – so they don’t miss out!
If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!
Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.
Cruel Britannia is available
in either print or eBook format here:
The Livingstone Presumption is available
in either print or eBook format here:
Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:
The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:
Is the increase in child poverty an argument for a wealth tax?
Child poverty has risen to its highest level yet and – due to Labour’s attack on benefit recipients – may reach five million in a very short time.
Figures from the government’s own Department for Work and Pensions suggest that by April 2024, there were 4.45 million children living in a household of relative low income after housing costs are deducted – the government’s own standard measure for poverty.
That is an increase of 100,000 children from the previous year – and equates to 31 per cent of children in the UK.
Chancellor Rachel Reeves’s decision to halve incapacity benefits for new claimants and introduce tighter criteria around the Personal Independence Payment for those with long term physical or mental health conditions, means an extra 250,000 people, including 50,000 children, will be pushed into relative poverty by these changes, according to the government’s own impact assessment.
Buy Cruel Britannia in print here. Buy the Cruel Britannia ebook here. Or just click on the image!
The Child Poverty Action Group (CPAG) has already predicted that 4.8 million children will be in poverty by the end of this Parliament in 2029-30. Labour’s attack on society’s poorest people may accelerate that increase beyond five million.
Wow. Five million children in poverty under a government going under the ‘Labour’ banner. I wonder what Tony Blair, who reduced the number of children in poverty (after housing costs – the same measure as above) by half a million during his time as a Labour prime minister, would think of it.
Under Blair, the number of children in relative poverty after housing costs were deducted fell from 4.3 million in 1997 to 3.8 million in 2002, and stayed at that level until Labour was voted out of office in 2010.
But consider this: child poverty has risen sharply since 2021 – the time of the Covid-19 crisis when people like Gary Stevenson say wealth inequality increased sharply.
Isn’t this new statistic evidence that he is right to say that the UK’s wealth needs to be re-balanced away from the super-rich – otherwise prospects for current and succeeding generations can only worsen?
Isn’t that what the figures show?
Gary argues that a wealth tax would make a huge difference. He was on the BBC’s Question Time calling for it, only to be poo-pooed by the likes of Camilla Tominey, who said it had been tried in around 12 countries, all of whom had abandoned it apart from Switzerland.
She was wrong about that. Switzerland has the most successful wealth tax, bringing in the equivalent of £25 billion per year. But wealth taxes are also levied in Norway (£37 billion), Spain (£1.2 billion) and France (although it has been modified into a property wealth tax there).
These taxes have been abandoned in Germany, Sweden, the Netherlands, Denmark, Austria, Ireland and Finland for various reasons – most commonly administrative costs and avoidance.
It occurs to This Writer that part of the problem in those places might have been asking wealthy people to devise a tax on wealth.
Perhaps it would be better to send working- or middle-class people off to Switzerland to find out how to levy a successful wealth tax, and then act on the result without attempting to modify it?
Or would that be too straightforward?
Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
(but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:
Be among the first to know what’s going on! Here are the ways to manage it:
1) Register with us by clicking on ‘Subscribe’ (bottom right of the home page). You can then receive notifications of every new article that is posted here.
2) Follow VP on Twitter @VoxPolitical
3) Like the Facebook page at https://www.facebook.com/VoxPolitical/
Join the Vox Political Facebook page.
4) You could even make Vox Political your homepage at http://voxpoliticalonline.com
5) Follow Vox Political writer Mike Sivier on BlueSky
6) Join the MeWe page at https://mewe.com/p-front/voxpolitical
7) Feel free to comment!
And do share with your family and friends – so they don’t miss out!
If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!
Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.
Cruel Britannia is available
in either print or eBook format here:
The Livingstone Presumption is available
in either print or eBook format here:
Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:
The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:
you might also like
How much can YOU pay? A&E charges would speed NHS privatisation
Michael Gove highlights his own lies; Tony Robinson is right
Osborne wants a ‘year of hard truths’. Here’s one: He’s HIDING the truth