Rachel Reeves's claim of a 'moral duty' to cut disability benefits is a hollow lie and a smokescreen for economic violence

Rachel Reeves’s claim of a ‘moral duty’ to cut disability benefits is a hollow lie

Rachel Reeves’s claim of a ‘moral duty’ to cut disability benefits is a hollow lie and a smokescreen for increasing poverty.

He claim is that it is a “moral duty” to get disabled people into work, as though slashing their benefits is some kind of benevolent nudge toward employment rather than a brutal act of economic violence.

She insists that “it can’t be right” to “write off” an entire generation—yet, in practice, her policy does exactly that, stripping support from a quarter of a million disabled people while offering no credible pathway into work.

This rhetoric is as familiar as it is hollow.

Buy Cruel Britannia in print here. Buy the Cruel Britannia ebook here. Or just click on the image!

The idea that people on disability benefits are being left to languish is a convenient narrative for a government looking to justify cost-cutting.

In reality, many of those affected will be people who simply cannot work, no matter how much the government wishes otherwise.

Others will be people trapped in a job market that remains profoundly hostile to disabled workers—one where discrimination, inaccessibility, and lack of employer support are the real barriers, not a lack of will.

Rather than ensuring fair wages, investing in accessible workplaces, or tackling employer bias, Reeves’s approach shifts the blame onto disabled people themselves.

The message is clear: if you’re struggling, it must be because you’re not trying hard enough.

And if you lose the benefits that keep you afloat? Well, that’s just tough love.

Reeves frames her plan as a moral necessity. But morality is not forcing people into work by making them destitute. Morality would mean ensuring that disabled people who can work are supported, and that those who can’t aren’t punished for it.

Anything less is not a “moral duty”—it’s just cruelty wrapped in soundbites.


Vox Political needs your help!
If you want to support this site
(
but don’t want to give your money to advertisers)
you can make a one-off donation here:

Donate Button with Credit Cards

Be among the first to know what’s going on! Here are the ways to manage it:

1) Register with us by clicking on ‘Subscribe’ (bottom right of the home page). You can then receive notifications of every new article that is posted here.

2) Follow VP on Twitter @VoxPolitical

3) Like the Facebook page at https://www.facebook.com/VoxPolitical/

Join the Vox Political Facebook page.

4) You could even make Vox Political your homepage at http://voxpoliticalonline.com

5) Follow Vox Political writer Mike Sivier on BlueSky

6) Join the MeWe page at https://mewe.com/p-front/voxpolitical

7) Feel free to comment!

And do share with your family and friends – so they don’t miss out!

If you have appreciated this article, don’t forget to share it using the buttons at the bottom of this page. Politics is about everybody – so let’s try to get everybody involved!

Buy Vox Political books so we can continue
fighting for the facts.

Cruel Britannia is available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

The Livingstone Presumption is available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

Health Warning: Government! is now available
in either print or eBook format here:

HWG PrintHWG eBook

The first collection, Strong Words and Hard Times,
is still available in either print or eBook format here:

SWAHTprint SWAHTeBook

Leave A Comment