Department, DWP, ERSA, Iain Duncan Smith, IDS, Johnny Void, Kirsty McHugh, Mandatory Work Activity, Mike Sivier, mikesivier, Pensions, sanction, The Void, Vox Political, welfare to work, work, Work Programme, Workfare
The Chief Executive of ERSA, the trade body established to lie on behalf of the welfare to work industry, has said that benefit sanctions are ‘political’ and called for a better evidence base for the current regime, writes Johnny Void in his eponymous blog.
Kirsty McHugh made the comments in an interview with Inside Housing magazine discussing the number of homelessness charities and Housing Associations that have ended their involvement with Iain Duncan Smith’s Work Programme. According to McHugh:
“(Work Programme) Providers want to be able to make a judgement themselves as to whether there is good reason why a client has or hasn’t broken the conditions of their benefit. But right now the system does not allow this.
“For political reasons, this government likes a “stick”, but I think we need a better evidence base.”
This flies in the face of the DWP’s current position, which is that benefit sanctions ‘help’ people gain work, even giving them a ‘welcome jolt’. In reality, as those involced in the Work Programme know only too well, they often destroy people’s chances of finding a job as those sanctioned sink into poverty, destitution and ill health.
For the rest of this article, visit The Void.